UK to Raise Revenues With $90 On-The-Spot Tickets

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

The UK Department for Transport (DfT) is preparing to give police the authority to issue instant fines to motorists accused of making simple, careless mistakes while driving. Under the proposal, police would ticket the alleged crime at £60 (US $90), bypassing expensive court hearings for a majority of cases. The new on-the-spot penalty is designed to increase the number of annual convictions to 30,480, resulting in more than £1.8 million in additional revenue (US $2.7 million).

The extra fines are specifically targeted at drivers with a good record who may have been caught making a simple mistake. Under UK law, “careless driving” represents a non-specific, catch-all category of traffic crime as distinct from specific offenses such as driving while talking on a cell phone, neglecting to wear a seatbelt or speeding. The fixed penalty would apply to anyone “driving in a way that falls below what would be expected of a competent and careful driver.” Although this fine could be challenged in court, doing so risks the imposition of court costs of up to £2000 if the magistrate rejects the not guilty defense.

“Anecdotal evidence suggests that the prosecution rate for careless driving is low, given the heavy burden of paperwork involved, which means that many potential offenders are not prosecuted or even charged, and so there is a potentially significant number of offenses that are going unpunished,” the DfT consultation paper explains. “Given the problem of careless driving, which is likely to be higher than available data suggest and the inadequacies of the current system for securing a conviction, there is a strong case for government intervention to improve driver compliance with expected driving standards.”

“We have assumed that, in the majority of cases that are dealt with by the issue of a fixed penalty notice, the driver is unlikely to have any other endorsements and that the issue of three penalty points will not result in the driver incurring any significant financial costs (e.g. as a result of disqualification),” the consultation states. “Where a driver accepts the fixed penalty, there would be a reduction in costs for the police, CPS and Court Service. A survey of drivers convicted of careless driving reveals that the majority pleaded guilty to the offense.”

The average cost of having a motorist go to court to plead guilty averages £680 (US $1005). Officials are eager to save this money by eliminating court hearings to the extent possible. The public comment period for the proposal expires on February 27, 2009.

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 15 comments
  • Anonymous Anonymous on Dec 27, 2008
    So in other words, a cop can pull me over and ticket me $90 for going 36 in a 35 zone, or not hitting the turn signal as early as he thought I should. No to the first and yes to the second. According to the article, "careless driving" does not include breaking of actual specific regulations, like posted speed limits, illegal turns, etc. Basically, it amounts to the cop saying, I don't like the way your driving. I can't cite a specific regulation that you're breaking, but I want to issue you a ticket anyway. to make this a presumed guilty until proven innocent situation is the height of foolishness, if you believe in a judicial system where presumed innocent actually means something.
  • TaxedAndConfused TaxedAndConfused on Jan 03, 2009

    This will have zero effect as there are so few traffic cops around these days. They have all been replaced by the "effectiveness" of cameras. Some UK police forces no longer have a traffic section any more.

  • EBFlex I come across stories every single day about how bad the CyberPuke is. It truly is amazing how bad Tesla screwed it up.You know that a vehicle that can make the fake lightning seem decent is a horrible vehicle. Ford designed one of the worst "trucks" in history and then Tesla came along and said "hold my IPA".
  • Cprescott I have watched a series of teardown videos by Munro and Associates (sycophants to Tesla) and cannot believe the hoodwinking that was done with this POS. There was no way it was ever going to sell the golf cart with a bed for the price they said. I cannot believe all of the space those motors take up - so huge and expensive. And the battery pack is the size of Rhode Island!
  • Rick T. That's the way the (Milano) cookie crumbles.
  • ChristianWimmer My requirements are simple: I love driving fast (Autobahn) and I want a relatively generous and stable range while using creature comforts. No EV on the market can satisfy this requirement, hence I am not interested in one.
  • Cprescott Jeep has become fool's gold - thinking they can move this brand upmarket and charge outrageous prices without regard to keeping track of market conditions.
Next