E85 Boondoggle Of The Day: Indiana Tapped Out

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

The Indianapolis Business Journal reports that Indiana’s E85 subsidiy slush fund has run out of cash just three months into that state’s fiscal year. High demand for E85 in the summer months when regular gas cost over $4/gal caused the state subsidy of 18 cents/gal to rapidly run through its earmarked funds. Now, with gas under $2/gal, E85 demand is tanking just as the subsidy ran out, leaving ethanol boosters in a tough spot. “In June or July, we could sell E85 blindfolded,” says Jim Gentry, fuel purchasing manager for Greenfield-based GasAmerica, one of the first firms to sell E85 in the Indianapolis area. “Back in the summer, we didn’t need the 18-cent [state tax] credit.” Now? “We blew through that money,” admits Kellie Walsh, executive director of the Central Indiana Clean Cities Alliance. “I am anxious to see whether gasoline prices dropping has our flex-fuel customers continuing with E85 or if they’re going back over.” One E85 retailer says his firm hasn’t given up on E85 yet. “That being said, that’s not to say it’s the smartest business decision at this point in time,” says Ed McClure, CEO of Marionbased McClure Oil Corp. Except that Indiana still offers a $20k grant to install E85 pumps even though such conversions can be done for as little as $15k.

Of course, Indiana’s E85 pimps are lobbying the state government to re-authorize the subsidy. Fuel vendors are the only retailers forced to prepay their sales taxes, and early next year gas retailers will pay state sales tax based on stratospheric summer gasoline prices. The tax calculation is made every six months, forcing fuel retailers to essentially front the state the money for six months until they get it back during the next calculation. But the Indiana Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Store Association argues many stations won’t last that long and is seeking help from the Legislature or governor. After all, things can be so rough when an unsustainable, government-inflated price bubble pops. After all, if you subsidize ethanol when it doesn’t need it, what do you do when it does?

In other ethanol bubble-popping news, the USDA is dropping its estimates for ethanol’s corn consumption in 2009 according to Green Car Congress. In November, the USDA’s World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates projected that 4b bushels of corn would be refined into ethanol. Now it’s estimating that only 3,700m bushels will be used, “as prospects for blending above federally mandated levels decline.” Unfortunately, that’s still 30.8 percent of all projected 2009 corn production, and a 22.3 percent increase over the past year’s use. Oh, and federal mandates will continue to ramp up each year, unfettered as they are to any organic changes in demand for the corn juice. So fear not, ethanol teat-suckers and E85BOTD lovers. This crazy train ain’t going off the rails anytime soon.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • FromBrazil FromBrazil on Dec 29, 2008

    Ethanol subsidies yikes! Down here we're paying anyhting betwee 3,5 and 4,5 dollars per gallon of gas (with 25% of ethanol thrown in for good measure!!) On a road trip I recently got about 15 km/l on gas (if it were pure gas that would be almost 20km/l, off the top of my head that almost or slightly more than 50 mpg). The shocker is this gas price has been going on for more than 3years!! Irrelavant of whether gas is 140 or 40 bucks a barrel. And a reason for that is to keep ethanol competitive (as our good friends in Indiana have found out, it is only competitive if gas is above 90 bucks a barrel). So I have the best of all worlds *sigh* I get to pay really high for gas so my country can be held up as the shiny example of transportation energy independence * cough * Cough * cough *. All the while I hace to visit the station more than necessary (due to poorer consumption of our gas with alcohol), but I do get clean air!! Really? Nobody talks about how burning ethanol increases NOX, you know the thing that causes acid rain. Though it produces less CO2 (a good thing in and of itself), doesn't spew particulate matter like diesels (my main gripe against diesels, not to mention noise etc.), nobody mentions the NOX thing. That can't be good!!!

  • BMW325I BMW325I on Dec 29, 2008

    Na govt you can have your ethanol and taxes. When hydrogen cars become more popular I will just buy a used one and build a mini electrolysis station to run on solar power and an outlet.

  • Jeff Not bad just oil changes and tire rotations. Most of the recalls on my Maverick have been fixed with programming. Did have to buy 1 new tire for my Maverick got a nail in the sidewall.
  • Carson D Some of my friends used to drive Tacomas. They bought them new about fifteen years ago, and they kept them for at least a decade. While it is true that they replaced their Tacomas with full-sized pickups that cost a fair amount of money, I don't think they'd have been Tacoma buyers in 2008 if a well-equipped 4x4 Tacoma cost the equivalent of $65K today. Call it a theory.
  • Eliyahu A fine sedan made even nicer with the turbo. Honda could take a lesson in seat comfort.
  • MaintenanceCosts Seems like a good way to combine the worst attributes of a roadster and a body-on-frame truck. But an LS always sounds nice.
  • MRF 95 T-Bird I recently saw, in Florida no less an SSR parked in someone’s driveway next to a Cadillac XLR. All that was needed to complete the Lutz era retractable roof trifecta was a Pontiac G6 retractable. I’ve had a soft spot for these an other retro styled vehicles of the era but did Lutz really have to drop the Camaro and Firebird for the SSR halo vehicle?
Next