Capsule Review: Mercury Sable

Steven Lang
by Steven Lang

She beckoned me. She betrayed me. Like a transvestite with a svelte smooth body, exposed by ungodly rough stubble underneath her lip. The 1990 Mercury Sable had a perfect silhouette that was maligned by two hundred parking lot dings and scratches on her lower front bumper. An older lady had given her some brutal blows to that lower psyche of hers over the years and now it was my turn at the wheel… so to speak. Little did I know that this first encounter would be just the beginning of The Crying Game. This particular example of a Mercury Sable was as unique as it was dichotomous. 47,000 original miles in 18 years. But a base model with a fecal brown exterior. The equally repugnant plaid brown interior did the vehicle no favors. But Hell. For $600 I’d just be willing to cover her up in a paper bag and drive her around town for a while.


And there was the surprise. This older Sable was actually more relaxing to drive than the classic Volvo’s, decrepit Jaguars, or even the downsized Cadillacs that make it to the impound lot auctions that I do on occasion. The 1st generation Sable offered outstanding aerodynamics that literally put all it’s contemporaries to shame (save the Audi 5000 and T-Bird). You put a raindrop on this beauty and the only thing that would have stopped it from going all the way to the ground is the evaporation that came from a blown head gasket or a grenaded tranny.

And alas, there was the true bitch that’s within the Sable’s beauty. Ford’s masterpiece of automotive art had been given a three dollar canvas by the bean counters. In fact, I can’t even find an AXOD transmission in North Georgia due to to the fact that they have all either been used or crushed. The 3.8’s I can find all too easily thanks to Ford putting that in everything from Mustangs to minivans for time immemorial. Come to one of my auctions full of abandoned and sized vehicles. Close your eyes. Throw a rock. Chances are you’ll either hit a Ford with a 3.8 or a Dodge Neon.

The Mercury Sable ended up languishing with junk quality parts for well over a decade and to be honest, Ford never really got their act together. Many people today don’t even know that the Mercury Sable exists which is a shame. Because if Ford had only chosen to give their customers a quality product, there would have never been a Montego. A what? Exactly.

Steven Lang
Steven Lang

More by Steven Lang

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Pixel Pixel on Dec 10, 2008

    I just picked up a '94 Taurus wagon with 200K for $205 on ebay. I figured at that price I could get my money back out of the biggest POS by parting it out. Went to pick it up and discovered it had been sitting for 6 months after developing a starting problem in hot weather. Car started right up with a tank of old gas, and drove 1.5hrs home without complaint. I've since put in about a $125 in assorted parts and brought it to "reliable beater" status. I've got a soft spot for the '88-'95 taurii, and really wish Ford had gotten their act together and done a sightly better job of building them, and hadn't a)done the horrible '96 redesign and b)then left the cars to wither on the vine.

  • SexCpotatoes SexCpotatoes on Dec 15, 2008

    I've still got my '94 Taurus, bought two years ago. It's needed a transmission, engine, fuel pump, tires, radiator, master cylinder, windshield washer fluid pump, but with 250,000 mi. on it, that's understandable. Still has the original starter! And my nephews and niece love riding in the "way-back" fold up wagon seat. I've coaxed 38.11 mpg out of it before too. All freeway cruise control driving, and not many new cars can beat that!

  • El Kevarino There are already cheap EV's available. They're called "used cars". You can get a lightly used Kia Niro EV, which is a perfectly functional hatchback with lots of features, 230mi of range, and real buttons for around $20k. It won't solve the charging infrastructure problem, but if you can charge at home or work it can get you from A to B with a very low cost per mile.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh haaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
Next