Bailout Watch 224: "Ford Respectfully Requests… $9b"

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Ford has released its nonclassified report to the Senate Banking Committee today, as CEO Alan Mullaly escapes from Detroit in his Escape hybrid. The Detroit Free Press has posted the entire report in PDF format, and it’s 33 pages of good stuff. The big news: despite insisting that federal funds are a “backstop,” Ford is asking for more money than it did last time Mr. Mullaly went to Washington. Specifically, Ford offers three scenarios, ranging from a short-term recovery (14.5m total US market in 2010 = $5b in support), to normal (12.5m in 2010 = $9b) to short-term worsening (11m units in 2010 = $13b). Ford’s “recommended terms of the loan would be: (i) at government borrowing rates; (ii) a revolving credit line with a ten year duration; and (iii) with additional conditions consistent with the TARP legislation.” When was the last time you “proposed” your own loan terms?

The plan calls for Ford’s senior executives to forgo any salary increases or bonuses in 2009, and beyond “as business conditions warrant” (nothing official to back up Mullaly’s claim to the WSJ that he’d take a $1/year salary to get the loans). Though Ford accepts that loans may be “callable,” it firmly rejects the possibility of any form of ownership change or even grant full seniority to government loans, arguing “A condition of senior status for any government loan could cause lenders or holders of our debt to allege a debt default, which could result in an acceleration of indebtedness and lead to the very result the legislation was designed to prevent, namely, a liquidity crisis.”

On the product front, Mullaly claims half of Ford, Lincoln and Mercury light duty vehicles will meet “Advanced Technology” standards, increasing to 75 percent in 2011 and more than 90 percent by 2014. Unfortunately, this includes “bio-fuels such as ethanol as an important long term solution to our energy needs.” Also, “Should pension investment returns not recover, or continue to deteriorate, government loans could be used to ensure the overall strong funding status of our pension plans.”

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Windswords Windswords on Dec 02, 2008

    “Though Ford accepts that loans may be ‘callable,’ it firmly rejects the possibility of any form of ownership change..." Gotta protect THE FAMILY, eh, Al baby?

  • Windswords Windswords on Dec 02, 2008

    “Though Ford accepts that loans may be ‘callable,’ it firmly rejects the possibility of any form of ownership change ..." Al's gotta protect The Family.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next