Australian Cruze Expensive, Unnecessary

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

The Australian federal government has hopped on the auto bailout bandwagon, “investing” $149m in production of a Holden-badged GM compact car. The South Australia state government will kick in $30m as well, as the Delta-platformed Cruze-alike will be produced near Adelaide. Styling and engineering will be carried out in Melbourne. And what do the Australian people get for their representatives’ fiscal abandon? According to Adelaide Now, the project will “support” 600 GM jobs and 600 supplier jobs, but it seems that these will likely not be new hires. Money for the project comes from Australia’s “Green Car Innovation Fund,” and its use is being justified by the possibility of ethanol, LPG and CNG powertrains at some indeterminate point in the future. “We recognise the needs and desires of motorists are evolving with growing concern around environmental factors and shifting consumer sentiment,” says Holden Chairman Mark Reuss. “Such evolution calls for an innovative approach… (and) the new vehicle will cater for growing demand for smaller cars focussed on economy.” when all is said and done though, the environmental issues are simply a greenwash for Australia to prop up weakening production and subsidize a “domestic” Corolla competitor. Sound familiar? The irony is that the GM doesn’t especially need a bespoke version of its global Cruze for Australia, although it will be required to match the government’s $149m outlay.

With the government picking up half the development cost it’s worth doing, but besides competing in Australia’s brutal small-car market there’s no real upside to the project. The alt-fuel talk is window dressing, there’s no chance of an export niche version, and GM is already ramping up to produce the Cruze in Europe, The US and Korea. There’s no good business reason to not import Cruzes from Korea… except for government “job-supporting” and green posturing. Sounds worth it.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Cthill Cthill on Dec 22, 2008
    If there’s a recognized demand for such a car, wouldn’t the car manufacturers already be making it? Oh wait, they are; just not GM/Holden. Well, at least it’s not my money being wasted this time. There is a recognised demand for small cars and all major makers are already in the market. Toyota Corolla, Holden (Opel) Astra, Ford Focus etc. None of which are now built in Australia. The question is whether it is worth spending tax payers money to have the cars manufactured in Australia.
  • Gover Gover on Dec 23, 2008

    Great the australian governments paying for half of the cars development. Where's GM getting the other half of the money from? The US taxpayer.

  • Zerofoo 5-valve 1.8T - and OK engine if you aren't in a hurry. These turbocharged engines had lots of lag - and the automatic transmission didn't help.Count on putting a timing belt on this immediately. The timing belt service interval, officially, was 100,000 miles and many didn't make it to that.
  • Daniel J 19 inch wheels on an Elantra? Jeebus. I have 19s on my Mazda 6 and honestly wish they were 18s. I mean, I just picked up 4 tires at over 1000 bucks. The point of an Elantra is for it to be cheap. Put some 17s on it.
  • ToolGuy 9 miles a day for 20 years. You didn't drive it, why should I? 😉
  • Brian Uchida Laguna Seca, corkscrew, (drying track off in rental car prior to Superbike test session), at speed - turn 9 big Willow Springs racing a motorcycle,- at greater speed (but riding shotgun) - The Carrousel at Sears Point in a 1981 PA9 Osella 2 litre FIA racer with Eddie Lawson at the wheel! (apologies for not being brief!)
  • Mister It wasn't helped any by the horrible fuel economy for what it was... something like 22mpg city, iirc.
Next