A Window To The Soul

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

While waiting for video of the Kia Soul to show up in the ol’ inbox, I decided to give the one press release I do have a read. And to be honest, I’m kind of regretting the decision. I fully understand that one should never be surprised by what might happen when asking a company to describe its own product. Still… well, let me show you what I’m talking about. The first thing you learn is that the Soul is a “brand defining” addition to the Kia lineup. Fair enough. Kia’s brand needs definition only slightly more than my rapidly aging, 26 year old blogger physique does. But instead of heading for the branding gym with its most promising product to date, Kia (like myself) is whipping its image into shape by texting and playing Wii. For example, did you know that Kia’s formula for its hip whip name reads “Soul = Style + ValU + SafeT”? No? Well the brand definition continues apace with the puzzling non-sequitor “L8st head-trnr will impre$ w/ personality & gr8 options ☺.” I kid you not. At this point I’m expecting Soul owners to receive a steady stream of text messages from their “attractive and customizable vehicle” suggesting they skip fourth-period history in favor of Cartoon Network and bong rips.



OMG WTF, right? I mean where do people who respond to (let alone understand) text-latin get the $14k-$18k Kia says they’ll need to buy a new Soul (pre-customization)? Then again, Kia is aiming this thing at “young and young-at-heart buyers.” Kia has clearly been keeping an eye on the Scion situation, which has proven fairly conclusively that the when marketers exploit a generation gap, the old farts (who have money) buy the products making a hollow mockery of the millions spent on appearing “edgy.” So rather than making an all-out play for the “street tuners” and hard-core keepers of the real, Kia’s Soul campaign walks a remarkably age-neutral line (ridiculous Gen-Text drivel aside).

And in a way, branding isn’t nearly as necessary to the Soul as you might think. After all, if it is everything Kia says it is, the Soul is a downright value proposition. 120 hp, 30+ mpg on the highway, tons of interior space and a 10 year warranty starting at $14k sounds pretty darn good in this economy. Maybe instead of paying some Madison Ave genius to lovingly craft a text message from the Soul, Kia could have just included a Rondo or Rio5 in each of the Soul’s press shots. Talk about brand definition. Kia seems poised to jump from the same old jellybean mediocritymobiles to a fielding a distinctive contender in the heart of a hot segment. In a single generation. OMG. WTF.

(Full disclosure: Kia sent us a press release. I read it and only nearly vomited. The official site is better.)

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 15 comments
  • CaliCarGuy CaliCarGuy on Dec 18, 2008

    @ TaxedAndConfused lol no. i just text alot so thats how y type lol

  • Fallout11 Fallout11 on Dec 19, 2008

    I'm a stogy old fart, and it looks good to me. Forget the new 2nd gen Scion xB, this is the original xB's replacement.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next