Brussels To Berlin: Drop Your VW-Gesetz, Right Now

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt
brussels to berlin drop your vw gesetz right now

Brussels just ratcheted up the thumbscrews they placed on Berlin: “Either drop that VW-Gesetz now, or we’ll see you in Europe’s High Court. You’ve go two months.” Automobilwoche (sub) has the story in German. In case you don’t know: The VW-Gesetz (VW-law) was written to give the state of Lower Saxony veto power. Lower Saxony holds 20.1 percent of Volkswagen. According to German law, a minority shareholder must have 25 percent to exercise veto power. Lower Saxony didn’t want to spend the extra money for the extra shares. A law was passed instead. For a long time, this law was seen as a weapon to ward off foreign raiders and other riff-raff: Who wants to take over a company they can’t boss around? Now, the law bothers two parties:

One, Brussels, because they don’t seem to understand why Volkswagen needs more protection than any other company. Two, Porsche, because they can own as many shares as they want, they still can’t subsume Volkswagen in Porsche’s books as long as Lower Saxony gives thumbs down. Which explains the fact that Porsche isn’t in a hurry to buy more shares than necessary as long as the VW-law is in effect. The European High Court will most likely look quite unkindly on the obstructionist German government: The court already had ruled that the law is illegal. Germany changed it a bit. But left the part in that gives a 20 percent shareholder veto power. The court is miffed. It may hand down fines up to €100K for each day the German government continues flipping its finger at the court.

The ultimatum sprouted from Brussels only hours after a German court declared the retreaded VW-law legal. That court is in Hannover, which happens to be the capital of Lower Saxony. “No expert expected the Hanover court to rule against Volkswagen, Lower Saxony, the federal government and parliament,” Bloomberg quotes Walter Bayer, a corporate law professor at the University of Jena, Germany. “We think this decision will be corrected on appeal. At the least, the European Court of Justice will most likely say this violates EU principles.”

Join the conversation
  • SCE to AUX I charge at home 99% of the time, on a Level 2 charger I installed myself in 2012 for my Leaf. My house is 1967, 150-Amp service, gas dryer and furnace; everything else is electric with no problems. I switched from gas HW to electric HW last year, when my 18-year-old tank finally failed.I charge at a for-pay station maybe a couple times a year.I don't travel more than an hour each way in my Ioniq 1 EV, so I don't deal much with public chargers. Despite a big electric rate increase this year, my car remains ridiculously cheap to operate.
  • ToolGuy 38:25 to 45:40 -- Let's all wait around for the stupid ugly helicopter. 😉The wheels and tires are cool, as in a) carbon fiber is a structural element not decoration and b) they have some sidewall.Also like the automatic fuel adjustment (gasoline vs. ethanol).(Anyone know why it's more powerful on E85? Huh? Huh?)
  • Ja-GTI So, seems like you have to own a house before you can own a BEV.
  • Kwik_Shift Good thing for fossil fuels to keep the EVs going.
  • Carlson Fan Meh, never cared for this car because I was never a big fan of the Gen 1 Camaro. The Gen 1 Firebird looked better inside and out and you could get it with the 400.The Gen 2 for my eyes was peak Camaro as far as styling w/those sexy split bumpers! They should have modeled the 6th Gen after that.