By on October 10, 2008

After four generations of on and off-road (more or less deliberate) adventures, Ford’s Explorer is trading in his body-on-frame for a lighter, greener, on-road-friendly unibody. Carfood is scarce these days, everybody has to go on a diet and count those octanes like calories. Ford has already shown their intent into this direction with the Explorer America Concept at the last NAIAS. All the opulence is gone, no more chrome, no more huge-ego. Big cars will need to be discrete. For moderately priced family cars, huge engines are no longer something to extol. If you really need one, than you’d better keep quiet about it. Aluminum, naturally perceived as being light (or the “genuine aluminum-plated plastic”) will kick in for decoration. Simple robust lines will make the fifth Explorer look rugged, even if it will not be as tough as it used to be. My other changes to the concept were the usual: bigger windows, real mirrors and door handles, proper air intakes and cost-friendly materials and finishes. Expect the real thing for 2010 or later.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!


14 Comments on “TTAC Photochop: Ford Explorer...”

  • avatar
    John Horner

    Will there even be a next-gen Explorer? If I were Ford I wouldn’t bother tooling it up. Keep making however few of the existing design the market wants, but there isn’t going to be any growth in that segment for a long time.

  • avatar
    Matthew Danda

    Can you say, “Cannibalize”? Its biggest competitors will be the Ford Edge and Ford Escape. Sheesh.

  • avatar

    Don’t worry. If it’s really that ugly it won’t cannibalize anything, including the competition.

  • avatar

    I’ll be upfront and say that a Ford Explorer, any Ford Explorer is at the very top of my “Cars I will never, ever think of buying” list. That said, this new one looks, (did I just say this?), fantastic!

  • avatar
    Samuel L. Bronkowitz

    My gawd, it almost looks like the offspring of a Nitro

    At this point I think the whole idea of a sport-ute is so toxic to some buyers that even a really good vehicle would have a very hard time selling

  • avatar

    I like it. I agree that it has a Nitro vibe going on. Looks like the unholy offspring of an Escape and Nitro with a smidge of Flex thrown in. Gawd I hope it has fender vents; big honkin’, gill-like ones that make it look like it could breath underwater if need be. More Cowbell Fender Vents!!!

  • avatar

    Er, aren’t the Flex and the Taurus X and all their other crossovers already such hairsplits of the same concept that even dealers have trouble distinguishing them? Do they NEED a fourth/fifth/whatever?

  • avatar

    Huh. I thought it looked much more like a Pilot than a Nitro. Regardless, I agree that cannibalization is going to be a big issue.

  • avatar

    Andrei, no one at Ford has your talent. Add a couple terrible decisions, and you may have it.

  • avatar

    Funny, I usually dislike the photochops.. and I pretty much never like any SUV’s looks, but this looks damn good.

  • avatar

    argentla : Er, aren’t the Flex and the Taurus X and all their other crossovers already such hairsplits of the same concept that even dealers have trouble distinguishing them? Do they NEED a fourth/fifth/whatever?

    This will obviously replace both the current Explorer and the Taurus X.

  • avatar

    Looks like a Flex derivative only better, except for that ugly grill in the front. For some reason I keep seeing a giant teddy bears nose when I look at it.

    Everyone else is right, Ford as too many of these in the same price range and market. Especially when the market is shrinking for these SUV looking things. They just don’t want to accept that profits are going to be smaller because people wont be buying the profit monsters like they used to.

  • avatar

    One very good question was posted above: Exactly where will this new Explorer fit in Ford’s lineup? Yes, yes, the Taurus X (a fantastic vehicle in its own right) is slowly being displaced by the Flex and the Edge takes up the rung between the Flex and the Escape. Above that, there’s the Expedition (which might or might not gain a diesel). Sooooo……

  • avatar

    I see little reason why anyone living in a city needs to be driving locally in an SUV, including an Explorer. However, I just bought (!!) at deep discount a limited edition Explorer. I love it. I live off a gravel road and there is no such thing ss a freeway anywhere near me. Yesterday, I was able to go up back roads to the north fork of a creek that I like to fish. The Explorer took to it perfectly. I loved the storage room for all of my equipment and supplies. The Explorer does well what it was designed to do — off-road, back-road, gravel and rural driving. And with gas prices at rock bottom on the local Indian reservations, all is good. I cannot imagine driving a sedan in this area or one of those flimsy, compacts.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • dantes_inferno: FCA motto: Dodge testing. RAM into production.
  • Schurkey: A few years back, I treated myself to a Challenger 5.7 Hemi rental car for several days when vacationing on...
  • SCE to AUX: I was shocked to see an SSR in the wild the other day. The Hummer EV will do better, but I wouldn’t...
  • SCE to AUX: Yeah, I’ll bet the engineers didn’t think of that. Have you seen the armor plate under the...
  • CaddyDaddy: Ya, but when Dalton got to Missouri and the Roadhouse, the Riv was the one to go with for the Dirty Work.

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Matthew Guy
  • Timothy Cain
  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Chris Tonn
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber