General Motors Death Watch 183: Credit Where Credit's Due. Or Not.

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Earlier today, GM CEO Rick Wagoner told the world that the automaker has “adequate liquidity” until the end of the year. So I guess no one believed him the first time. Ipso facto. Wagoner’s reassurance came on the same day GM’s stock price sank to a forty-year low. The same day Goldman Sachs recommended that investors run for the hills. No surprise, then, that Wagoner felt compelled to go beyond his previous “we’re good” guarantee. "We have a lot of options to fund beyond that," Wagoner soothed. Unless they don’t. In which case, it’s fork sticking time.

The idea that GM’s cash burn will force them to go back to the well to keep the flames at bay is gaining momentum. The Bank of America and Goldman both hold this opinion, and peg the amount required at around $10b. And then, today, GM's cost of borrowing increased. Again. Fitch Ratings downgraded the ailing American automaker to B-, six steps below investment grade. That’s not good with a capital S, for hello New York? SELL!

Remember: GM is already paying $3b a year in interest ($250m per month). Also keep mind that Fitch Ratings is not a populist stock picker like Jim Cramer. The agency has access to information that the average investor will never see— including projections. If Fitch jerks your chain, you’re definitely barking up the wrong tree. Even worse: Fitch gave GM a negative rating, leaving the door open for further downgrades.

How low can GM go? The company’s fortunes and rep can sink to the point where Wagoner’s “other funding options” disappear. If GM's bankers think the automaker is headed for a massive default, the money men are under no obligation to let GM play with other people's money. (In fact, just the opposite.) New lenders? What makes you think the people who can write billion dollar loans are more clueless than the average TTAC reader? I mean, now.

In terms of raising money, credit ratings are more important that GM's horrific stock price/market capitalization. But the sinking share price reflects the general take on General Motors: there's no boffo sequel to virtually extinct high-profit light trucks.

Pawning GM foreign ops to fund GM NA would be even greater lunacy than the current set-up, where cash generated outside the U.S. disappears down the corporate rat hole. There's nothing to stop GM declaring NA kaput and hiving-off the rest of the world, in the same way Delphi’s done. There's everything to lose by NOT doing so. Literally.

If GM can’t raise additional money, and even if they can, the artist formerly known as the world's largest automaker needs to file for Chapter 11 sooner rather than later. The more cash General Motors has going into bankruptcy, the better the chances are that they can make it out. Not intact– that would defeat the entire purpose of the exercise. But out.

At the moment, there’s only one real glimmer of hope on the horizon: Chrysler files first.

When ChryCo goes, it will NOT be coming back. Their C11 will leave a Honda-sized hole in the American market. Presumably, Chrysler-favoring domestic loyalists will then head for GM and Ford stores. But they may not. They may apportion themselves to other automakers as they do now— which is to say they’d continue leaving Detroit metal for transplant products in ever greater numbers. Alternatively, the U.S. new vehicle market may contract so radically that Chrysler going away wouldn’t make that much difference to anyone.

Meanwhile and in any case, Wagoner is sounding increasingly Nixonian. I don’t know if Rick is kibitzing with a portrait of Roger Smith at the top of RenCen, but statements like “GM has moved quite proactively to address the dramatic consumer shift away from light trucks,” and taken "some very tough measures” sounds both revisionist and, well, nuts. Given GM’s double digit sales declines and sub-20 percent market share, Wagoner’s “we knew this was going to happen” assertion can only strike a handful of people as even remotely credible.

I still think that GM will be felled by something out of left field; some unexpected big ticket item that will do the straw camel’s back thing. A key supplier hitting the wall that GM can’t afford to bail out. A court ruling of some sort. GMAC’s collapse.

But perhaps not. Perhaps GM’s Board of Directors will allow GM’s management to keep flying until the corporation runs out of gas, and falls out of the sky. Which is a shame. Chapter 11 was designed to offer dying companies a chance at a gentler landing and a fresh start. But I suspect that the people running GM couldn’t give a shit about GM.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 64 comments
  • Matt51 Matt51 on Jul 01, 2008

    Subtract exports from imports and are you positive or negative? Do you know what percentage of GDP we can tolerate before the dollar declines, according to most economists? Most say 3%. We are now over 7%. US has exports, but nowhere near enough to pay for our imports. The Bear Stearns bailout cost US taxpayers $35 Billion. No vote in Congress, just the fed bailing out a bank. Write off $35B of Detroits debt, and they too would be healthy. McCain says no bailout, Obama has not said yet. Reagan led the bailout of Harley, Sen Lugar of Indiana led the bailout of Chrysler. So this is not a party issue, the question is will one of the candidates, to carry some key states, offer a bailout of the auto companies.

  • FromBrazil FromBrazil on Jul 02, 2008

    It seems to me that one of the things that happened was that the US (consciously or not), some day around the end of the 70s beginning of the 80s, decided it was not going to do heavy industry anymore. Everyone was gonna work in banks and insurance and Wall Street, design (but not manufacture) clothes and shoes, and all of this would be enough to buy the dirty products from the poor sods in the 3rd world who were now responsible for supplying the world with capital goods and the products of heavy industry. No more dirty drilling, dirty mining, dirty refining! No more dity tanning and no more sweatshops!! So all your heavy industry was taken to Mexico, Brazil and Asia, your steel companies and mining companies were bought by foreigners. In the meantime the price of commodities just kept on rising and now your stuck in a situation in which everyone works for like Prudential, and is tryiong to sell the same products to everybody else. The reality is, like everything else, life moved on. The aove mentioned dirty industries are not so dirty anymore. They still require a lot of work and physical strength, but technology doesn't stop. A modern car factory in Brazil is much cleaner and organized than anything in North Amrica. A modern steel plant down here is much cleaner and less polluting than anythin up there. The car industry is just following the same logic. To reverse this, I think, is almost impossible. Unfortunately the greenies and scial reformers and whatnot have got a hold of Obama's ears. He won't be drilling in Alaska! Nor authorizing some extra refining capacity. So you'll continue treading the same ownward path. At that's a big,no huge shame, as I love America and its former can-do-anything spirit.

  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
Next