Chrysler Death Watch?

chrysler death watch

On April 3, 2005, this website began the General Motors Death Watch. Few industry or media types credited the possibility that the world’s largest automaker could be on the ropes. By this August, when the Ford Death Watch series began, it was clear to all and sundry that GM is in a fight for its life. And, of course, that Ford was in the same position. That left Chrysler as the sole domestic automaker whose fortunes weren’t in deep decline. And then, two weeks ago, Chrysler announced that it will lose $1.52b in the third financial quarter. Does that mean its time for a Chrysler Death Watch? First, a little history…

After staring down the barrel of bankruptcy in 1979/1980, Chrysler tapped into Uncle Sam’s wallet to make a remarkable recovery. The automaker tossed its moribund product line and milked their new K-car like a prize cow. At the same time, they sought out niches other companies had ignored. The Voyager minivan was a smash hit, and the company’s convertibles revived a dead genre. The ‘93 Ram pickup was another major score. In ’98, Daimler-Benz completed its [s]takeover[/s] “merger of equals." With a transfusion of German money, management and engineering, Chrysler’s future looked brighter than ever. The ensuing 300, Magnum and Charger found plenty of willing buyers. Once again “Hemi” was on the lips of power-hungry pistonheads both young and old.

But past lessons– both good and bad– were forgotten. Despite the badge engineered departure of their Plymouth and Desoto brands, Chrysler is once again diluting its appeal by selling cheap imitations of its own products. After building reasonably distinctive, commercially successful vehicles from the same platform (300, Charger, Magnum), Chrysler is trying to pass off a tarted-up Durango as an Aspen (a name that brings it no honor) and a hideous Caliber clone as a Jeep. The former will find no friends and the latter degrades a venerable brand. The money spent on both “new” models could have paid for a much-needed refresh of the august PT Cruiser, or other aging products.

When gas prices skyrocketed, sales of Chrysler’s gas guzzlers tanked like everyone else’s. But instead of curtailing production of the slower-selling models, Chrysler continued pushing them off the assembly line. According to PR flack Jason Vines, the automaker’s dealer network is currently sitting on 600k unsold units. At the start of this month, DCX dealers are holding 36,500 unsold Chrysler 300s. At the current rate of sales, that’s an 84-day supply, when 60 days is considered a healthy “pad.” The inventory situation is so bad in general that dealers are refusing delivery of ‘07’s, further choking Chrysler’s chicken.

It is, in fact, a scandal. Peter DeLorenzo over at Autoextremist.com recently quoted a Chrysler “insider” who reported that “upper management has been building cars without dealer orders for close to two years in order to keep the factories open and the truth of their financial situation hidden… DCX 'sells' the unassigned units to their business centers and books the profit from these sales when necessary to prop-up quarterly profits.” On Monday, Automotive News reported that the company paid dealers as much as $750 per unit to take extra stock after its supply of unsold inventory reached 92 days.

Group CEO Tom LaSorda now says that the company will cut both internal costs and production. To that end, Chrysler recently asked the United Auto Workers to match the health care “concessions” given to GM. The union’s refusal doesn’t bode well– which could change once Chrysler starts shuttering factories and offering buyouts a la The Big Two. One wonders how Chrysler’s plan to import Chinese-made economy cars will affect that equation. Meanwhile, Chrysler has matched the Big Two’s zero percent financing to anyone who can make it through the dealer’s door, and added incentives on slow-selling pickups and SUVs, including some 2007 models.

DCX Chairman Dieter Zetsche has been curiously silent through the recent PR storm. The last time we heard from dear Dieter, he accused the UAW of being “irrational” in their resistance to healthcare concessions. Market analysts have been a bit more vocal, though. Jochen Gehrke of Deutsche Bank AG states DCX should sell Chrysler Group, which he says will “unlock” the value of Daimler’s stock.

Even with the $1.5b hit, DCX is in relatively good financial shape. But just like their cross-town rivals, no company can survive that kind of fiscal hemorrhage forever. In fact, it’s now clear that the business basics dragging down GM and Ford– a lack of investment in established products, the introduction of lackluster vehicles, the union strait jacket, burdensome health care and pension costs, dishonest or oblivious management, top heavy bureaucracy, a bloated dealer network– are also hobbling Chrysler. Perhaps it's time to combine all three automakers into a Detroit Death Watch.

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 66 comments
  • Jerry weber Jerry weber on Oct 02, 2006

    Some of the bloggers get it others don't Lieberman saying that 6-8% of a cars cost for medical insurance is insignificant doesn't gel with Dieter Zetches pronouncement that he would like to earn 5% at Chrysler and 6-8% at Mercedes. That says it all. Funky D, you and I can't believe the same story right out of Iacocca's book, the infamous job bank; building for storage and future sales is alive and well. Chrysler knew or should have that the last dodge full sized pickup was over the top in styling and facing resistance in the marketplace. Did they trim production until a new model comes out? Of course not. Their minivan advantage is down to seats that fold into the floor, honda and toyota are rated above chrysler in this segment in every other measurement. Jeep, was allowed to be eclipsed by hummer. In this segement, over the top syling seems to be a winner and jeep is conservative and smallish vis a vis the competition. As for a death watch, it will be different here, chrysler will be dumped by mercedes and then we will have to see what the remnants look like and who own them. (A brand new death watch perhaps?)

  • Glenn Glenn on Oct 02, 2006

    People (and companies) which refuse to learn from past mistakes are doomed to repeat them. Also interesting is how Jeep is the ruination of every company which has ever built them / bought the company, yet the self-same companies regarded the Jeep brand as an icon worth buying. Willys Jeep of Toledo was the original company, and the Jeep business saved the company (the very well engineered Willys Aero compact automobile line was a good seller in 1952-1953 until the Ford-GM sales war of 1954 which nearly ruined all the other car companies including Chrysler). Kaiser Motors, which had succeeded in a seller's market but was just a money pit for the Kaiser group after that, decided to remain in the auto business despite huge losses, and wanted to sell their overly massive plant (to GM) so bought up Willys Jeep and moved Kaiser car production to Toledo in 1954, ceased production (and killed the Willys Aero just before compact sales finally took off in 1956) by 1955. Kaiser stumbled along with Jeep until it finally offloaded it to American Motors in 1970 (Kaiser finally departing the auto industry for good), the rest of the industry essentially saying it was a foolish purchase for AMC. By 1980, Jeep was carrying AMC almost entirely and Renault bought into AMC (and Jeep) to help and to offer AMC fresh front wheel drive subcompact lines already designed, plus assisted a bit with Jeep engineering. The best vehicle Jeep ever made, the Grand Cherokee, came out (but with a terrible GM V6 option, soon replaced by AMC's exellent inline six). By 1987, Renault had seen enough of the money-pit and had sent enough money to refloat the Titanic for no good results, (i.e. return profits) and sold out to Chrysler. So, after Chrysler bought AMC and Jeep, it went through a down-cycle and nearly went belly-up, was threatened with a take-over and instead got bought by Daimler-Benz (in a "merger of equals" - not). Not long after this, DCX as an entitiy was in trouble and would not and could not afford to help bail Mitsubishi (which, ironically, have built licened-production JEEPS for 5 decades). So, is Jeep a curse or what?

  • EAM3 Learned to drive in my parents' 1981 Maxima. Lovely car that seemed to do everything right. I can still hear the "Please turn off the lights" voice in my head since everyone wanted a demo of the newfangled talking car. A friend of the family had a manual transmission one and that thing was fun!
  • FreedMike That wagon is yummy.
  • Syke Thanks, somehow I missed that.
  • 285exp I am quite sure that it is a complete coincidence that they have announced a $7k price increase the same week that the current administration has passed legislation extending the $7k tax credit that was set to expire. Yep, not at all related.
  • Syke Is it possible to switch the pure EV drive on and off? Given the wonderful throttle response of an EV, I could see the desirability of this for a serious off-roader. Run straight ICE to get to your off-roading site, switch over the EV drive during the off-road section, then back to ICE for the road trip back home.
Next