UAW Reaches Tentative Deal With All Detroit Automakers, Striking Ends

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The United Auto Workers have reached a tentative agreement with all three Detroit automakers. Ford was the first to strike a deal, followed by Stellantis. But General Motors wasn’t far behind and managed to settle things with the union early Monday morning. Based on comments from select UAW members in the know, the final issue reportedly revolved around EV battery plants.


The issue came up relatively early in the union’s “stand-up strike” that began on September 15th. By early October, there were concerns that employees working at the automotive sector’s new battery facilities (many of which are jointly operated with foreign suppliers) likewise needed to be covered by labor agreements.


The deal with Stellantis was announced on Saturday and is said to mimic the terms the union already had negotiated with Ford. While we’ve covered the topic, specifics on the deal are still forthcoming and likely won’t be fully known to the public until after it’s been ratified by voting union members. The UAW effectively turned up the pressure on all automakers in recent weeks, targeting their most lucrative facilities for expanding labor strikes.


GM’s last facility to see a walkout was the incredibly important Spring Hill Manufacturing located in Tennessee. The site is responsible for several Cadillac and GMC-branded crossover vehicles. But its most important role is putting together powertrains and body panels for some of the automakers’ highest-volume models. Workers were told to abandon their posts on Saturday, not long after striking wrapped for Stellantis.


It was apparently too much for the company to endure and news broke early on Monday that General Motors (now standing alone against the UAW) had likewise reached a tentative contract agreement with the union. The last hurdle was rumored to be the inclusion of Ultium Cells LLC (a joint venture between GM and South Korea’s LG Energy Solution) in the UAW’s master contract. This would effectively set the stage to make unionization easier at subsequent battery plants.


As with the Stellantis agreement, we’re expecting the union contract with General Motors to be based closely on the deal made with Ford. That includes a 25-percent wage increase over the duration of a contract that won’t expire until 2028, the reinstatement of cost-of-living adjustments that were dumped in 2009, improved profit-sharing with workers, faster employee progression to the top wage tier, and eventual abolishment of tier wage scales over the next four years.


There will also be an immediate pay bump for all unionized employees. For GM, that equates to an 11 percent increase in wages within the first year. That should put the average employee just north of $35 per hour by 2024 and set the stage for that number to reach $45 per hour by 2028.


The union also won improved job guarantees. However, these will vary between automakers. GM seems to be offering ways of transitioning employees over to EV facilities as it gradually abandons combustion vehicles. Though there’s a lot of room to speculate how that will work at this stage.


There will also be investment guarantees that will be made known as more details are shared ahead of the ratification votes. Thus far, we’re only aware of Ford’s plan — which includes $2.1 billion for Ohio Assembly (with some of that going toward electric vans); $1.2 billion for Louisville Assembly (with some slated for new EVs and hybrid models of existing cars); $1 billion in Kansas City Assembly; and $900 million set aside to maintain localized F-Series production.


A UAW national council vote is anticipated for later this week regarding GM, with voting likely to take place beforehand on the other tentative agreements. If approved, the terms will be handed off to local union leaders who will present it to general members that will ultimately decide whether or not the deals are ratified. Ratification bonuses are included in all three deals, encouraging union members to take the deal and net themselves a few thousand dollars instantly.


While striking will undoubtedly resume if any of the above deals fall through, it seems as though union actions are probably over for 2023. UAW President Shawn Fain has been bragging about how the current contract proposals have broken union records and represent a restoration of ground lost over the last few decades. Granted, there is a contingency of union members who seem confident sweeter deals could be negotiated. But they look to be in the minority. Regardless, it’s undoubtedly wiser for all members to wait until they’ve seen the proposals in full before taking any formal stance.


Considering automakers were claiming to be losing hundreds of millions of dollars in lost revenue per week due to strike conditions before the UAW began targeting their most important factories, it’s unlikely they’re interested in seeing any more factory downtime either. That same is true for auto parts suppliers, which have had to endure layoffs and some production stops of their own while things were sorted out with the UAW.


Expect formal announcements to be made by the union and each of the three automakers involved over the coming days.


[Image: UAW]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 117 comments
  • Crown Crown on Nov 02, 2023

    EBFlex, can you not read yourself and discern what each poster is saying. I shouldn't have to run a name roster for you. Do your own work.

  • Crown Crown on Nov 02, 2023

    Daniel J, It is the CEO's job to show those stockholders what they can do to maximize profits: Look we cut our employee compensation; Look we substituted this cheap fifty cent part for that high quality part was costing us $3.

  • ChristianWimmer 2018 Mercedes A250 AMG Line (W177) - no issues or unscheduled dealer visits. Regular maintenance at the dealer once a year costs between 400,- Euros (standard service) to 1200,- Euros (major service, new spark plugs, brake pads + TÜV). Had one recall where they had to fix an A/C hose which might become loose. Great car and fun to drive and very economical but also fast. Recently gave it an “Italian tune up” on the Autobahn.
  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
Next