Tesla Notches a Win in Early Lawsuit for Deadly Autopilot Crash

by Chris Teague

Published: November 1st, 2023

tesla notches a win in early lawsuit for deadly autopilot crash

Tesla has seemed to be in constant legal peril over the last couple of years, as several high-profile crashes involving its semi-autonomous driving functions have led to investigations and lawsuits. Even so, the automaker was victorious in one of its first trials, which ended earlier this week.

The trial, which ended on October 31, was for allegations that its Autopilot driver assist tech caused a fatal crash. Despite its name and the misleading title of Tesla’s other assistance system, Full Self-Driving, none of the automaker’s technologies make its vehicles self-driving. The names came under scrutiny in the trial, with the prosecution asking a Tesla engineer if he felt the automaker created them to give the impression that vehicles were truly autonomous. He gave a “no” answer, but the U.S. Department of Justice has an open criminal probe focused on the topic, so we’ll probably hear more about that soon.

This lawsuit ended with the jury deciding that the driver was ultimately liable and that the Tesla did not have a manufacturing defect, but the issues they were asked to sort through were confusing and convoluted. Though some suits focus on how Autopilot is designed and its potential for abuse, the jury in this latest case only had to evaluate whether a defect impacted the vehicle’s steering system.

Tesla was pleased with the result, saying that its vehicles make the roads safer. The decision also illustrates an interesting view by the jury that the driver is ultimately responsible, even when the vehicle is doing most of the work. The question of liability is significant and is one of the biggest threats to autonomous vehicles. No automaker is going to jump at the opportunity to be sued for millions if someone abuses an autonomous vehicle, so it will be interesting to see how the rest of Tesla’s cases play out.

[Image: TierneyMJ via Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#TeslaAutopilot #teslalawsuit #TeslaFsd

Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 12 comments

ToolGuy on Nov 01, 2023

Automotive jury trials are weird.
(I know this because I got rejected as a prospective juror for one. LOL.)

Like Reply
Crown on Nov 01, 2023

It wasn't a "defect", it was false advertisement- "Full Self Driving"

2 Reply

Recent Comments

Theflyersfan Non-performance models, probably the Civic based on the fact the interior feels and looks better in the Honda. Both of them are going to drive like adequate appliances with small engines and CVTs and get decent mileage, so this is based on where my butt will rest and things my hands and fingers will touch.Toyota doesn't have an answer to the Civic Si so the Honda wins by default.CTR vs GR Corolla. One dealer by me is still tacking on $10,000 markups for the CTR and good luck with the GR Corolla and the "allocation" system. There's that one dealer in Missouri that I pasted their ad a while back wanting $125,000 for a mid-level GR. Nope. But cars.com is still showing markups. Both of these cars will have little depreciation for a while, so the markups equal instant loss. It looks like Cincinnati-area dealers are done with CTR markups. So this is a tough choice. I don't like the Corolla interior. It looks and feels inexpensive. I'm glad Honda toned down the exterior but the excessive wing still looks immature for such an expensive car that 20-somethings likely cannot afford. FWD vs AWD. With price being an object, and long-term maintenance a thing, I'd go with the Honda with a side eye at the Golf R as a mature choice. All with stick shifts.
ChristianWimmer Great first car for someone’s teenage daughter.
SCE to AUX Imagine the challenge of trying to sell the Ariya or the tired Leaf.
Offbeat Oddity I would have to test them out, but the Corolla might actually have a slight edge. I'd prefer the 2.0 in both cars, but to get one in a Civic with a decent amount of equipment, I'd be stuck with the Sport where the fuel economy suffers vs. the Corolla. If the Civic EX had a 2.0, it would be a much tougher decision.
User get rid of the four cylinders, technology is so advanced that a four litre V8 is possible.. and plausible.. cadillac had a serious problem detuning v8s in the past, now theyre over-revving the fours and it sounds horrible.. get rid of the bosses and put the engineers in the front seat..