Report: Current Ford Mustang to Exit Production At the End of 2028 UPDATED

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Automakers work hard to stop leaks and make sure their products are kept under wraps until the time is right. They’re not always successful, however, and sometimes the leaks come from outside the company. This time, it’s the UAW’s documents giving out more info than Ford probably wants, as it recently confirmed that Mustang production will end in 2028.


Rumors have floated that production of the current S650 Mustang would end at that time, but the UAW’s labor agreement with Ford all but confirms it. As Muscle Cars & Trucks pointed out, that could mark the end of the V8 engine in the muscle car segment, though Ford has previously said it’d hang on to the setup for as long as possible.


The Mustang is the last holdout in a segment that once saw several popular models. Chevy is discontinuing the Camaro very soon, and Dodge cut the Charger and Challenger after 2023, though at least one could return with the automaker’s new inline-six engine.


As for the Mustang’s future, the car is expected to run on a new EV-first platform shared with the Mustang Mach-E and a new Mach-E coupe variant. It’s unlikely that a gas engine would continue in the car unless the architecture can support both powertrain configurations. 


UPDATE: Ford has reached out to claim the report we sourced from Muscle Cars and Trucks is factually incorrect. Here's the automaker's statement: “The Muscle Cars & Trucks report about Mustang is not accurate. Beyond this, we don’t comment on speculation about future products.” I did try to get clarification on how the report was incorrect, but Ford's spokesperson reminded me of the latter part of that statement. So the company says the sourced report is incorrect, but is unable and/or unwilling to give us more -- it's standard operating procedure across the industry, as long-time readers well know, not to comment on future product.


It's hard to say what this means, though I think it's probably fair to assume the current Mustang will be produced longer than MC&T reported. We'll keep an eye on this story -- TH


[Image: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 57 comments
  • Kcflyer Kcflyer on Dec 07, 2023

    I have always loved mustangs. But no way I'm paying C8 money for one. So kill it, I won't care.

    • Marques Marques on Jan 03, 2024

      This. Did it occur to anyone that part of the reason that some sports cars aren't as popular as they used to be is because that prices are so high that potential customers have been effectively priced out of the market?? I like a Mustang as much as the next person but paying $40-$75K for one is asinine! Mustangs used to be affordable but now they literally cost more than some mortgages!





  • Spectator Spectator on Jan 09, 2024

    I got an email offer today for a 2024 GT at about 5% off MSRP. Really a lot of bang for the buck!

  • JK Savoy Blue is a thing, but Sestriere White? Sestriere is a ski town near Turin, so I guess it meant to conjure up thoughts of snow. Pretty car. I hope Pininfarina has success. The industry in and around Turin has taken a big hit and is a shadow of its former self.
  • Ravenuer My 2023 CRV EX, 6 mo old, 4800 miles: $0.
  • TheEndlessEnigma My '16 FiST: Oil changes, tires, valve cover gasket (at 112k miles), coolant flush, brakes.....and that's itMy '19 Grand Caravan: Oil changes, coolant flush
  • John Clyne I own a 1997 GMC Suburban that I bought second hand. It was never smoked in but had lost the new car smell when I got it four years after it was sold new. I own a 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche & that still has the new car smell. I like the smell. I could never afford a new car until the Avalanche. It might be my last new car? Why do they build cars with fire retardant materials in them. Smoking rates are falling & if someone continues to smoke in this day & age is a fool especially with all the information out there.
  • Theflyersfan Non-performance models, probably the Civic based on the fact the interior feels and looks better in the Honda. Both of them are going to drive like adequate appliances with small engines and CVTs and get decent mileage, so this is based on where my butt will rest and things my hands and fingers will touch.Toyota doesn't have an answer to the Civic Si so the Honda wins by default.CTR vs GR Corolla. One dealer by me is still tacking on $10,000 markups for the CTR and good luck with the GR Corolla and the "allocation" system. There's that one dealer in Missouri that I pasted their ad a while back wanting $125,000 for a mid-level GR. Nope. But cars.com is still showing markups. Both of these cars will have little depreciation for a while, so the markups equal instant loss. It looks like Cincinnati-area dealers are done with CTR markups. So this is a tough choice. I don't like the Corolla interior. It looks and feels inexpensive. I'm glad Honda toned down the exterior but the excessive wing still looks immature for such an expensive car that 20-somethings likely cannot afford. FWD vs AWD. With price being an object, and long-term maintenance a thing, I'd go with the Honda with a side eye at the Golf R as a mature choice. All with stick shifts.
Next