Porsche Taycan Update Halves Level 2 Charging Times

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Porsche released a fairly impressive update for the Taycan EV this month, one that effectively halves the sport sedan’s charging time whilst using a Level 2 charger. 


Now that a meaningful number of people have purchased all-electric vehicles, we’re learning that diminished range and long charging times are the biggest obstacles EVs have to overcome. Based on numerous studies, including a very recent one conducted by J.D. Power, early adopters seem to enjoy that battery-driven vehicles can offer a more placid driving experience. At-home charging is also something that’s getting a lot of praise. But it’s being undermined by the lackluster charging infrastructure outside the home. 


In fact, the issue has become a serious problem in terms of U.S. adoption – with the J.D. Power study suggesting that consumer interest in EVs hasn’t improved over the last twelve months. While the outlet noted that other issues were certainly at play, namely elevated EV pricing and a sense among some that alternative energy vehicles are being foisted upon the public through government intervention, it cited charging/range as being the biggest hurdle for EVs. 


This is especially true for the Taycan, which has a maximum range of just 215 miles under the most idyllic of circumstances. While the vehicle’s initial draw was that it was the first dedicated electric vehicle offered by Porsche, its meager range has become a common criticism. Porsche has sought to counter this by reminding everyone that the Taycan is quite the performance machine (something made possible by its all-electric powertrain) and trying to draw focus on how quickly it can charge. 


This update seeks to literally drive that point home. 


Porsche’s Taycan has an onboard battery charger situated behind the frunk and there’s a new unit designed to replace the port that can just about halve Level 2 charging times when combined with Porsche’s latest AC home charger unit.


While the standard charger takes up to 9.5 hours to fully charge a Taycan equipped with the Performance Battery, the updated unit is alleged to bring that time down to just 4.8 hours. Vehicles equipped with the larger Performance Battery Plus can expect to see a full state of charge (using a Level 2 port) in 5.3 hours – down from 10.5 hours,


New owners can specify the new charging system in the build process by selecting the KB4 option in the configurator. But Porsche says the unit can also be retrofitted to older models (price TBD). It likewise suggested that it could become more efficient in the future thanks to the Wi-Fi connectivity embedded in Porsche’s proprietary wall charger. Of course, that’s ultimately going to be determined based on the limitations of the hardware. Though automakers will always promise you the moon when it comes to forward-looking statements. 


If you want the whole shebang, expect to shell out a healthy amount of dough to have your vehicle retrofitted for the new charger. But those buying a brand-new Taycan only need to drop another $1,850 (plus taxes) and an additional $1,500 for the wall-mounted charger. However, Porsche noted that the latter item needs to be “hard wired directly to a 100-amp circuit by a professional electrician for best performance,” meaning you’ll have to pay a little more if your home’s not already set up for higher loads.


[Image: Porsche]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Dec 22, 2022

    If this feature is enabled by subscription then it makes a lot of sense for Porsche.

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Dec 23, 2022

    Charging more quickly on the road = more better.

    Charging more quickly at home = I don't care so much.* **

    *Given a vehicle with sufficient range

    **100 amps sustained at home doesn't thrill me (my electric range circuit breaker is 50 amps and as you know the heating element is intermittent in actual use)

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next