Baltimore Bridge Collapse Has Major Implications for Automotive Sector

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

A cargo container ship exiting the Port of Baltimore collided with the Francis Scott Key Bridge early Tuesday morning. You’ve undoubtedly seen the footage by now, as well as the rampant speculation about what happened. As of now, nobody seems to know the full details of the incident but the ramifications should be relatively easy to predict. As a major shipping corridor for the United States, losing access means supply chain bottlenecks.


It simultaneously makes for a good excuse whenever the transport of goods is delayed or companies begin pitching higher rates for oceanic freight — something we saw take place in the wake of the pandemic.


The Port of Baltimore is responsible for moving all kinds of goods. But it’s most famous for passenger vehicles, semi trucks, and construction equipment. In fact, it’s typically the U.S. port that sees the largest number of cars and light trucks annually — at roughly 800,000 passenger vehicles per year.


However, losing the Francis Scott Key Bridge will effectively make the port useless until the area can be cleared of debris. Before collapsing, the bridge stood at the mouth of the port and required ships to pass beneath it to reach the docks. Until the necessary clean up has been concluded, no container ships will be able to use the port.


From Reuters:


Baltimore port's private and public terminals handled 847,158 autos and light trucks in 2023, the most of any U.S. port. The port also handles farm and construction machinery, sugar, gypsum and coal, according to a Maryland government website.
The port handles imports and exports for major automakers including Nissan, Toyota, General Motors, Volvo, Jaguar Land Rover and the Volkswagen Group — including luxury models for Audi, Lamborghini and Bentley.
Volkswagen on Tuesday said its port operations in Baltimore were unaffected by a local bridge collapse due to the location of its facilities.
"We do not anticipate any impact on vessel operations but there may be trucking delays as traffic will be rerouted in the area," the carmaker said in an e-mailed statement.


Meanwhile, logistics providers have been inundated with worried customers. The next few weeks will see numerous diversions to shipping routes and it’s likely to be several months before the port is even usable.


“Our first priority is engaging clients to make plans for containers that were originally routed to Baltimore that will be discharged at other ports on the Eastern Seaboard,” stated Paul Brashier, vice president of drayage and intermodal for ITS Logistics.


“These diverted volumes will impact the ports of New York/New Jersey, Norfolk and the Southeast and we have to prepare trucking and transload capacity to get that freight to its intended network.”


The container ship Dali that collided with the bridge was on its way out of the Port of Baltimore, en route to Colombo, Sri Lanka when it collided with one of the large pillars. The ship’s manifest stipulated that it was staffed by a 22-man crew from India. While there has been some speculation about a possible terror plot, strict terrorism seems unlikely due to the fact that the incident took place during the hours that the bridge would have been the least populated. Industrial or economic terrorism on behalf of another nation seems more likely. But there’s been no evidence to support either claim. At present, it appears to have been a terrible accident.


An investigation is underway but the only things they’ve been able to glean is what the public has already heard. Maryland Governor Wes Moore has said that the ship lost power shortly before the incident. There were also rumors of fire, however those appear to be unfounded.


Six individuals have been reported missing, though we don’t yet know who they are. Two individuals were pulled from the water. However, investigators using sonar have found that there are several vehicles located beneath the water. The Maryland Secretary of Transportation said some of those are assumed to have belonged to work crews that were present at the time of the crash.


The Singapore-flagged Dali had previously collided with a dock at Port of Antwerp in 2016. That incident was attributed to mistakes made by the master and pilot on board. Synergy Marine Group, which owns and manages the ship, confirmed the vessel hit a pillar of the bridge at about 1:30 on Tuesday morning, with every member of the crew accounted for.


President Joe Biden has reportedly said he plans to travel to Baltimore “as quickly as I can.” Statements were also made that he plans for the federal government to pick up the entire cost of rebuilding the Francis Scott Key Bridge.


“We’re going to rebuild that port together,” Biden from the White House, before departing for North Carolina to discuss the administration’s healthcare agenda as part of his reelection campaign.


If you live in the Midwest or Northeastern United States, there’s a good chance you’ll be impacted by the bridge going down. As previously mentioned, automobiles will be the primary cargo that’s to be affected. But coal, gasoline, construction materials, and a myriad of other items will likewise be impacted by the incident. Ships are already being rerouted to alternative ports. But it’ll be weeks before a comprehensive workaround is sorted out and any solution is likely to require the use of additional rail cars and trucking freight.


[Image: Alexander Briggs/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 163 comments
  • Zipper69 Zipper69 on Mar 31, 2024

    I thought only the bobbleheads on Fox would be asinine enough to actually claim that DEI had ANYTHING TO DO WITH THIS.

    Seems I was wrong, as a jughead repeats the claim and tops himself by connecting the all Indian crew with racial diversity.

    Newsflash: all Indian crews ARE CHEAPER.

    Please wear your white hood when posting further racist trash.

  • Bpscarguy Bpscarguy on Apr 04, 2024

    As someone born, raised and currently living in Baltimore.... here is a news flash for the dummy in chief - Baltimore is just up the road from DC! You can be there in about 40 minutes driving, probably 10 minutes in Marine 1. So, pretty lame that he says he is going to make it there "As quickly as he can". Whatever. More useless every day...

  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
  • Ajla Remember when Cadillac introduced an entirely new V8 and proceeded to install it in only 800 cars before cancelling everything?
  • Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
  • Lynn Joiner Lynn JoinerJust put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
Next