Rare Rides Icons: The Cadillac Eldorado, Distinctly Luxurious (Part XIX)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

We’re back with more Cadillac Eldorado today, in our final entry on the third generation models. We spent our last installment reviewing the special and sometimes troublesome engineering that was standard on the Brougham. Since then, I discovered this April 1957 edition of The Cadillac Serviceman, GM’s in-house magazine publication for its dealer service centers. Twelve clearly scanned pages of technical and service detail await you! After reading, return here and learn about the changes made to the Eldorado line in 1958.


Annual changes to vehicles kept customers coming back, marketing happy with new things to advertise, and made it clear to the general public if you could afford a new car (or not). In 1958 the hot new ticket was quad headlamps. Now legal in all states, all Cadillacs adopted them immediately. Everyone wanted to be seen in a new quad headlamp car, and with few exceptions domestic cars used the same four sealed beam lamps up front.


The Eldorado’s upper fenders had to be widened in 1958 to accommodate an extra set of lamps, and chrome bezels extended further toward the rear than in 1957. A sign of the times, the awnings over the headlamps retreated and disappeared as that trend faded from popularity. Though the hood was the same basic shape as before, notable changes occurred with regard to decor: The finned hood ornaments previously on the fenders migrated to the center of the hood, right where they lived in 1956.

At the prow, the Cadillac logo was wider than before to take up more surface area, along with a mildly enlarged V decoration underneath. The hood shut line was newly horizontal, and no longer gave way to inset Dagmars. Instead, those pointy decorations moved toward the outward edge of the grille. Their shape was slightly less pointed at the tip than in 1957. 


Leading inward toward the center of the grille there was a new chrome strake on either side, set into a new egg crate grille. The grille had circular bullet type protrusions from the intersections of the grille vanes, and was a more subtle take on Buick’s Fashion-Aire Dynastar grille. That grille was a ‘58-only design, as Buick introduced the disastrous Limited lineup. Worth noting, GM was reeling at the time stylistically and its upmarket and luxury ‘58s were an attempt to catch up to Virgil Exner’s very successful Forward Look Chrysler and Imperial models of 1957.

At the lower portion of the bumper 1958 Eldorados returned to a square parking lamp, though the use of chrome heavy-handedness increased that year. The big bumper extended further back toward the wheel than the prior year, as the Eldorado grew in length from 222.1 inches in 1957 to 223.4 inches in 1958. The wrap-around chrome vent detail of 1957 was replaced by a U-shaped design instead, which no longer wrapped around the front corner. 


Above it was an additional piece of chrome trim placed over a character line that was previously unadorned. There was no longer Seville or Biarritz script above that body detailing. Instead, the Cadillac crest returned just ahead of the door, in gold. But designers weren’t nearly finished adding trim in 1958!

Aft of the door, 10 vertical chrome spears appeared. They served no particular purpose, but added a bit of visual heft to an already heavy side profile. But the real weighty-looking additions were left for the ‘58 Eldorado’s backside.


The quad gunsight ports used for reversing lamps and the integrated exhaust were gone. Instead exhausts exited underneath the bumper, and a new eggcrate and bullet-inspired chrome assembly took their place. These large ovoid shapes were the reversing lamps, and the lens was huge. 

The bumper shape no longer extended from the wheel arch chrome to wrap under the Eldorado, but instead terminated with a horizontal platform on either side. Further inward next to the license plate, there were a set of 10 additional chrome strakes, matching the design of those on the rear fender. That’s 30 total strake details if you lost count. 

Finally, the traditional V and Eldorado block lettering was relocated to the left side of the trunk for 1958. The V itself was made narrower, almost to look like a bird. Block lettering was more stylized and larger than the prior year. 


As one might expect, the low-volume Eldorado Brougham did not receive a handy front and rear clip update like other Cadillac models. Instead, some updates were made to its interior. 1958 Eldorado Broughams had leather appointments at the top of their door panels in place of metal the prior year. There was also a new turbine-type wheel cover, in place of the spoked wheel Brougham shared with other Eldorado models in 1957.

There was also some special model advertising in 1958 to celebrate General Motors’ 50th production year. Dubbed the “Golden Anniversary” models, the line began with the newly minted Chevrolet Bel-Air Impala and Pontiac Bonneville Catalina, and moved up to the Oldsmobile Starfire 98, the slow-selling Buick Limited Riviera, and finally the Eldorado Seville. Notable here, the Seville eclipsed the Biarritz as the top-line standard Eldorado offering. 


Recall the original idea of Eldorado was as a halo convertible. No longer, customers preferred the hardtop coupe! The “Golden Five” was just a marketing tactic, however. There’s no evidence to suggest any special limited editions were issued as part of this 50th anniversary. 

Leaner times and an economic recession in 1958 would ensure the third-gen Eldorado was a rare one. Compared to 6,050 Eldorado sales in 1956, 1957 saw 1,800 Biarritz and 2,100 Sevilles rolled from showrooms, along with 4 special-order Sedan Sevilles. Just 400 Eldorado Broughams were sold. 


For its second outing in 1958 with more awkward styling, recession-addled Americans purchased just 815 Biarritz convertibles, and 855 examples of the Seville. Buyers of the Eldorado Brougham were wealthy enough to be immune to a recession, and the sedan managed 304 sales that year. 

And wealth was certainly required, as the 1957 Eldorado Brougham was $13,074 ($147,000 adj.), far and away the most expensive production car in the US at the time. It was in a different league to the likes of the Seville or Biarritz at $7,285 ($81,910 adj.). Brougham was seen more in line with the Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud or the elegant Facel Vega.


The following year in 1959 it was time for a do-over of Cadillac styling, where GM could take aim at Virgil Exner’s work more directly. Rocket inspired looks, even more chrome, and the biggest fins ever? Check. See you next time.


[Images: GM, seller, seller]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 22 comments
  • Ras815 Ras815 on Mar 30, 2024

    Loved reading that Serviceman brochure.


    I cracked up at all of the warnings about NOT OPENING THE DOORS while the Brougham is off the ground ("this would activate the air suspension system"). Must have been a nightmare for mechanics...

  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Apr 01, 2024

    Much prefer the front end/face on look with the quad headlights. Although it does appear very similar to the grille of a full sized Chevrolet of the same year. From the rear window back the looks in my opinion are better suited to a smaller vehicle. And I am still not a fan of the vestigial tail fins used in 1957 and 1958. With fins either go big or go home. Extra large tail fins and massive amounts of chrome make a definite 'I have arrived' statement. So am really looking forward to all the columns that Corey will dedicate to the '59 model year.

    • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Apr 02, 2024

      I certainly prefer the back end of the Pontiac to that of the Cadillac. And probably the rear side view.

      And it finally struck me, the rear view of the silver Cadillac in this column (the 2nd last photo) reminds me of the rear view treatment of the corresponding generation of Corvette. Does anyone else see that resemblance?




  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
Next