Junkyard Find: 1978 Chevrolet LUV

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Small Japanese pickups became increasingly popular in North America as the 1970s went on, with plenty of Hiluxes and 520s/ 620s rolling out of Toyota and Datsun showrooms. Detroit wanted some of that minitruck money, and so each of the Big Three turned to a Japanese partner to make it happen. Today's Junkyard Find is the GM player in that game, found in a self-service boneyard near Reno, Nevada.

The Chevy LUV (which stands for Light Utility Vehicle) was really an Isuzu Faster, built in Kanagawa Prefecture. The first LUVs arrived on our shores in 1972.

Ford began importing Mazda Proceeds with Courier badges at around the same time. Eventually, North Americans could also buy these trucks with Mazda badges (and even with Wankel engines).

Chrysler was a little slower to join in, importing Mitsubishi Forte pickups with Plymouth Arrow and Dodge D-50/ Ram 50 badging starting in 1979. Ram 50s could be bought new here all the way through 1994, more than a decade after Mitsubishi began selling the same trucks with Mighty Max badging.

This truck has a battered camper shell that seems to be nearly as old as it is.

Made by Parker Industries in Arizona.

A junkyard shopper bought the engine, which would have been a 1.8-liter SOHC straight-four rated at 80 horsepower. The Chevrolet Chevette got smaller-displacement versions of this engine (or a 1.8-liter Isuzu diesel).

Starting in 1979, LUV shoppers could get four-wheel-drive. This one is a rear-wheel-drive truck with a good old four-on-the-floor manual. A three-speed automatic was available.

The LUV's days were numbered from the moment GM began planning the Chevrolet S-10. The S-10 first hit showrooms as a 1982 model, and that ended up being the LUV's final year of sales.

Isuzu was selling its vehicles in North America under its own name by that time, so new Fasters remained available here (first as the P'up and later as just the Isuzu Truck).

It appears that someone tried to sell this LUV for a hundred dollars, but found no takers. It's thoroughly battered but not rusty.

How many packs of Pyramids was it worth at the end?

When equipped with the optional automatic transmission, you can tow a 172-ton freight train loaded with LUVs.

GM really pushed that automatic. I've found exactly one junkyard LUV with two pedals.

[Images: The author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Jan 24, 2023

    Spookiness--Many more people would own a Maverick as well. Ford underestimated the demand for a compact pickup and by the time Ford gets production of the Maverick up to where most people can buy and test drive them without paying above MSRP or ordering one other manufacturers will have entered the market with their own compact pickup. Toyota has plans to introduce a hybrid compact pickup using the Rav4 platform and even Ram has plans for a compact pickup in the next year. Even though Maverick is outselling the Santa Cruz people who have waited for a Maverick are buying the Santa Cruz. Both the Santa Cruz and the Maverick are good and the more manufacturers that make their own compact pickup is better for all. More choice is always better.



  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Jan 24, 2023

    A restomod project for those who think all pickups are too big.

  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next