Junkyard Find: 1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 Mystery Machine

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The Chrysler Corporation sold vans based on the B-Series platform from the 1971 through 2003 model years, giving them Dodge, Plymouth and Fargo badging along the way. Today's Junkyard Find is a first-generation B-van, found in a Colorado boneyard.

The Mystery Machine from the "Scooby-Doo" animated series has inspired countless van owners to slather on various blue/green/yellow/whatever paint schemes over the decades, and that's what happened to this Tradesman.

I was three years old when the "Scooby Doo, Where Are You!" series launched, but I managed to avoid it for my entire Generation X childhood (though I was heavily influenced by Simon Bar Sinister's brain-reprogramming Phoney Booths in "Underdog" at that time).

Working as a wise and respected judge for the 24 Hours of Lemons Supreme Court since 2008, I've seen plenty of Mystery Machine-themed race cars, including some genuine vans.

You can get away with a Mystery Machine race wagon, too, as long as the team's costumes measure up.

A Sentra Mystery Machine? Why not?

Subaru Mystery Machine? Sure!

You get the idea. And yet with all the Mystery Machines I've seen on race tracks and at car shows, today's '77 Tradesman is the first Mystery Machine I've documented in a junkyard.

Maybe they just don't get thrown away, unlike Kidnapper Vans (this one got discarded in a Northern California yard back in 2007 or so).

This Tradesman got a mild camper conversion at some point.

It has wood paneling, mismatched junkyard-obtained captain's chairs and break-in-proof rear windows.

For the 1971 through 1980 model years, the passenger versions of these vans were given Sportsman badging, while the cargo versions were Tradesmen. The Tradesmen were preferred for customizing, because the windowless side sheet metal provided more space for airbrush murals and bubble windows shaped like hearts or pot leaves.

For 1981, the passenger B-Series vans became Ram Wagons and the cargo versions became Ram Vans.

Production continued through 2003, though major revisions took place in 1998 and body components from those vans won't swap with the 1971-1997 vans (underneath the skin, the chassis remained more or less unchanged).

Ford and GM stuck with their B-Series competitors for similar spans. Ford's E-Series (best known as the Econoline) stayed about the same from the 1975 through 1991 model years, then lived on a version of the original chassis through 2014. General Motors built the G-Series Sportvan/ Rally/ Chevy Van/ Vandura in essentially the same form from 1971 through 1996.

The build tag says it was built at St. Louis Assembly, and that its first engine was a 318-cubic-inch V8 with one-barrel carburetor.

This is a Chrysler LA small-block for sure, and that's a Carter BBD one-barrel carburetor, so it could be the original engine.

Instead of the base three-speed column-shift manual, this van has the optional three-speed automatic. Such luxury! Chrysler went to four-on-the-floor rigs for their three-pedal B-vans a few years later, with the shifter mounted where the driver had to reach back for it.

It's rusty in the usual spots, and there's not much demand for Malaise Era Mystery Machines with 150-horsepower smog V8s. Next stop: The Crusher!

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

1977 Dodge Tradesman 200 in Colorado junkyard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 19 comments
  • THX1136 THX1136 on Apr 22, 2024

    A band I played in during the early 70's had an older 60's Econoline (side door and the stylized front headlights). Starting out we could get everything in it along with all 4 of us - cramped, but it worked. When we added VOTT cabs for PA we had to get a larger vehicle. Our bass player purchased a new Chevy van in '73 which allowed us to still fit most of the gear in although the drums rode separate. Even then the stuff was nearly stacked to the ceiling.

  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Apr 22, 2024

    In the mid-'70s I drove a first year model. It got the job done, and it was durable and reliable. That was the time when Chrysler stopped making the durable, reliable Dart/Valiant, and replaced it with the Aspen/Volare. The trucks took longer,

    • Jeff Jeff on Apr 23, 2024

      That was truly a dark period in Chrysler when the Dart/Valiant went away. Chrysler quality which wasn't the greatest took a bigger nose dive by the mid to late 70s. Chrysler bankruptcy and the Government loan guarantee of 1.5 billion in 1980.


  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
Next