Extremely 'Funky' Genesis GV60 Revealed

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Having distinguished itself from the rest of the Hyundai Motor Group, Genesis has been furnishing desirable luxury vehicles that are a little easier on your pocketbook than what’s on offer from Germany. But it’s still inextricably linked to its corporate family, which recently introduced the Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Kia EV6 to make sure everyone knows they’re not snubbing electrification. Not wanting to be left out, Genesis has revealed something riding on the E-GMP platform as well.

Unfortunately, it’s kind of hideous.

While the Ioniq 5 is an extremely handsome vehicle and the EV6 is more than passable for a mainstream electric, the upcoming Genesis GV60 looks as though someone at the company tried to execute the brand’s design language in the most chintzy way imaginable. We’ve been hearing other outlets describe it as “funky.” But that only works if they’re using the term in the same manner one might reference the smell of feet.

Hyundai’s designs have been very good lately — Jo Borras even wrote an article exploring why this week. I would argue that success extends to Genesis, which has managed to adopt thematic elements across its lineup that adhere to the fundamentals of good car design while also being fairly unique in the industry. But very little of this applies to the GV60.

Marketed as a crossover, the model is effectively an all-electric hatchback aping what it can from the GV70 minus the upscale swagger. For starters, Genesis opted to present the vehicle in yellow rather than the dark and neutral hues Genesis typically uses to show off its wares. Yellow is a fine color for a vehicle but it doesn’t exude class and seems at odds with the Genesis brand. The same goes for the plastic cladding found around the wheel arches and the creaseless, bubble molding that defines the vehicle’s exterior.

It just doesn’t look like a premium item that’s been painstakingly crafted with a sense of purpose. But the bad news ends with the exterior, as the GV60’s cabin is probably a cut above its E-GMP brethren. Whereas the Ioniq 5 offers a clean, minimalist cockpit and the EV6 takes a more future-chic approach (bottom of the page for comparison), GV60 is delivering a gentle middle ground with some upscale flair.

That’s not to suggest it’s better. The Genesis’ interior does lack some of the distinct personality offered by the electrics coming from Hyundai and Kia. But the resulting space bridges the gap between traditional and modern in a way that’s going to be more pleasing to some.

It’s just difficult to say whether or not that has resulted in a better automobile overall until it’s been driven, however. Genesis has kept a lid on the mechanical specifications. But it should be the same as the Ioniq 5 and EV6 with some unique packaging options. That means various motor and battery configurations with the bottom end being a single, rear-wheel unit cranking 167 horsepower. While the top-end GV60 could use the same dual-motor setup that has the EV6 pushing 576 hp, something about the Genesis’ design makes us think the company will prioritize efficiency as it waits to see how Kia’s performance EV fares.

It’s definitely not the South Korean electric at the top of my list. Though Hyundai Motor Group is probably wise to launch a bunch of compliance-friendly electrics with varied personalities. If one model fails to resonate with consumers and gives the Tesla Model Y serious competition, the company has two alternatives flanking it. There’s a good chance that there’s something you like about one of them, theoretically multiplying the chance of a sale by three.

Pricing is an absolute mystery at the moment but we would expect the GV60 to start somewhere above $45,000 when it arrives in the United States in 2022. Mechanical details should be provided between now and then.

[Images: Hyundai Motor Group]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Flipper35 Flipper35 on Aug 20, 2021

    Looks like a shortened Porsche Panamera to me which is good as it looks better than the Porsche.

  • Bd2 Bd2 on Aug 28, 2021

    Never liked the design, but introducing it via a CGI in that awful neon yellow makes it even worse than it is (looks better in black in real life photos). The GV60 is Genesis' subcompact model, so it's smaller than the EV6 and Ioniq 5.

  • CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
Next