A More Basic Base: 2021 Cadillac XT6 Sheds Cylinders, Price

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Cadillac’s XT6, a midsize crossover our reviewers had something to say about, arrived in mid-2019 with one powertrain in tow. Instant rivalry sprung up between the front-drive-biased XT6 and the rear-biased Lincoln Aviator. Our preference lands firmly on the latter CUV.

Regardless of our feelings on the model, Cadillac has decided to broaden the XT6’s net, introducing a new base model for 2021 that sinks the model’s power and price.

Appearing beneath the hood of the 2021 XT6’s entry-level “Luxury” trim is General Motors’s tried and true 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder — an engine you’ll find in all versions of the smaller XT4. Making 237 horsepower and 258 lb-ft of torque, the four-banger moves the XT6’s 4,362 pounds (4,565 with all-wheel drive) through a nine-speed automatic.

With the Chevrolet Traverse having ditched its optional four-cylinder, this base XT6 becomes the girthiest GM vehicle to pack a 2.0L under hood.

Like numbers? We like numbers. Because of the power drop, XT6 owners who turn up their nose at the previously standard 3.6-liter V6 will discover their trailering capacity has shrunk fourfold, from 4,000 pounds to a weak-sister 1,000 pounds. Fuel economy rises a bit, however. As noted by GM Authority, the EPA has just weighed in on the matter, rating both the FWD and AWD 2.0L XT6 at 23 mpg combined. That’s a 3 mpg increase from the 3.6L model.

More numbers, and ones that might be more important to this model: the front-drive ’21 XT6 Luxury carries an after-destination MSRP of $48,990 — a fairly healthy decrease from the ’20 XT6 Premium Luxury FWD’s $53,690.

You’ll be able to tell the base XT6 apart from loftier variants by its standard 18-inch wheels, as well as its seven-passenger-only cabin. No executive-minded six-person configuration in this trim. Luxury trim buyers will still see a standard 8-inch infotainment screen, heated and ventilated front seats, and Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity.

Safety aids come in the form of standard automatic emergency braking, forward collision alert, HD rear-vision camera, Safety Alert Seat, intelligent headlamps, and front and rear park assist. However, because this is GM, one must move up the Cadillac trim ladder to receive blind spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 33 comments
  • JLGOLDEN JLGOLDEN on Aug 21, 2020

    I've sat in these a few times, just to gauge the most basic "ass in the seat" impressions. Nothing feels especially premium to the touch, and there are no "wow" factors with design, materials, or textures. A loaded Hyundai Palisade, on the other hand, feels coddling and rich from the driver's reach. Hell, even the dated Infiniti QX60 has a more inviting interior, satisfying controls/touch points.

  • Tankinbeans Tankinbeans on Aug 21, 2020

    I find that almost handsome, but the inset vents make it look like it has hollow cheeks. That said, I can't imagine spending that much on any car.

  • CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
Next