Cadillac CT5-V and CT4-V: Alpha Males With a Weakness?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

“2.7L Turbo” — that’s General Motors’ preferred description of the large-displacement four-cylinder found in Chevrolet’s 2019 Silverado 1500. When wearing a Cadillac crest, however, the motor generates additional grunt and serves as the main motivator for the new CT4-V, a sportier version of Caddy’s new compact.

The CT4-V (seen above) debuted alongside the hotter version of its midsize sibling, the CT5-V, in an event held in Detroit Thursday night. No, the regular CT4 was not there. After getting over the shock of a V-badged Cadillac with a four-banger mill, guests were confused to learn that there may be additional V-badged versions of these two sedans.

As expected, the larger CT5-V carries a version of the twin-turbo 3.0-liter V6 found elsewhere in the Caddy lineup. In this application, the engine generates an estimated 355 horsepower and 400 lb-ft of torque, routed to the rear (or all four) wheels via a 10-speed automatic.

That blown six transfers into traction through 245/40R19 rubber, with the 3,975-pound sedan aided on the handling course by the latest iteration of GM’s Magnetic Ride Control. For this application, the suspension setup adopts V-specific tuning.

It sounds fine, until you recall that the model this vehicle replaces — the beastly CTS-V — carries a supercharged 6.2-liter V8, good for 640 hp and 630 lb-ft.

For the smaller CT4-V, which looks very much like its Escala-inspired stablemate, power comes by way of the aforementioned 2.7-liter turbo four, aided by extra boost, and routed through a 10-speed auto. Rear-drive is standard, with AWD available. Better breathing ramps the 2.7L’s power up to 320 hp and 369 lb-ft — a mild improvement over the Silverado’s 310 hp and 348 lb-ft, but a big climb-down from the ATS-V’s twin-turbo 3.6-liter V6. That engine produced 464 hp and 445 lb-ft.

Looking at the CT4-V’s engine, it’s safe to assume the base CT4 mill will be GM’s trusty turbo 2.0-liter.

But what of the other V-series variants promised in Detroit? As reported by Roadshow, Cadillac’s executive chief engineer, Brandon Vivian, said that broadening the V-series “gives us the ability to have a range of V-Series models,” adding, “there will be different personas.”

Different personas, yes, but what about the names? You’re not alone in thinking it’s weird that a V-series Cadillac model could come in more than one form, with, perhaps, more than one engine. How will Cadillac differentiate the variants via trunklid badging? Stay tuned for the answer to that question. It’s likely the brand will lean on its bizarre metric torque figure badging strategy as one way of separating the different variants.

Certainly, Cadillac has hotter mills than either the 3.0TT and 2.7L Turbo to stuff into these machines, and it wouldn’t be surprising to see the Blackwing 4.2-liter V8 make an appearance in the CT5-V. The CT4-V cries out for something with extra oomph.

Elsewhere on these cars, four-piston Brembo front brakes and limited-slip differentials (electronically controlled on CT5-V) give a nod to performance, while available Super Cruise backs up GM’s claim that its advanced driver-assist system would soon proliferate throughout the brand.

Pricing for either model was not forthcoming Thursday night; expect those figures to drop closer to the models’ early 2020 on-sale date. By then, your V-series questions will likely be answered.

[Images: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 63 comments
  • Nvinen Nvinen on Jun 04, 2019

    "Too powerful"? That's like too sexy, too much chocolate, too much money, too smart. No such thing! I mean, who's forcing you to use all the power available? You could use some of it, smug in the knowledge that there's more if you need it.

  • Cimarron typeR Cimarron typeR on Jun 04, 2019

    I agree with the above posters. These are built for Chinese consumption. The benefit to this is that the sedan will still get some development so if ever Americans fall out of love with SUVs the General will still have a product to sell.

  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
Next