Under Fire From Multiple Foes, Jaguar Land Rover to Cut 4,500 UK Workers

by Steph Willems

Published: January 10th, 2019

under fire from multiple foes jaguar land rover to cut 4 500 uk workers

For now, Tata-owned Jaguar Land Rover isn’t saying whether any of its British plants will close as a result of the automaker’s cost- and job-cutting spree, nor whether we’ll see a shedding of models from its portfolio. Many would argue there’s some Jags in need of cutting.

With global sales falling 4.6 percent in 2018, the automaker claims the next phase of its “Charge and Accelerate” transformation plan will leave 4,500 UK workers out of a job.

JLR’s plan is to free up nearly $3.2 billion in costs and cash flow over the next 18 months, helping it realize long-term profit growth while creating a “leaner, more resilient organisation.” It’ll certainly be leaner on the personnel side — 2018 saw an additional 1,500 UK workers laid off. The latest cuts, some accomplished through a voluntary redundancy program, amount to 10 percent of the automaker’s UK workforce.

Dr. Ralph Speth, JLR CEO, called the cuts a response to “multiple geopolitical and regulatory disruptions as well as technology challenges facing the automotive industry.”

Basically, JLR’s in a bind the world over. The company’s Chinese-market sales took a steep tumble in 2018, falling 21.6 percent. Meanwhile, Europe’s sudden pivot away from diesel-powered vehicles left the company holding a dirty bag. Its Jaguar car range no longer resonates with many North American buyers, and trade uncertainties and the ongoing Brexit saga only adds to the company’s woes. The company’s profits turned to losses in 2018.

While the automaker didn’t mention the fate of specific products in its announcement, it’s generally believed that cuts are coming to Jaguar’s model range, spurred by the public’s move away from sedans. Rumors last year suggested the company might be considering an all-electric Jaguar range. Certainly, JLR took the opportunity today to talk up green investments born of newfound savings.

“These investments include today’s announcement that, from later this year, next-generation Electric Drive Units (EDU) will be produced at the company’s Engine Manufacturing Centre in Wolverhampton,” the company stated. “The Battery Assembly Centre will be one of the largest of its kind in the UK, using new production techniques and technologies to manufacture battery packs for future Jaguar and Land Rover vehicles.”

[Image: Jaguar Land Rover]

#JaguarLandRover #JLR #Jobs #ProductPlanning #Sales

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 16 comments

Art Vandelay on Jan 10, 2019

Is that the Explorer ST? Oh wait.

Like Reply
- Inside Looking Out on Jan 11, 2019
  
  Someone said JLR are rebadged Fords. How true!
  
  Like
Tstag on Jan 11, 2019

Most of JLRs problems are short term: China - likely to be resolved shortly pending US/ China trade agreement Brexit - could be solved by April Diesel - lots of hybrids and electric cars on the way at JLR Longer term issue is what to do with the XE. If Jaguar simply axe it then the XF sales will probably improve. These kind of cars don’t sell well in the US and their home market is saturated with cheap deals on 3 series and C class models. Electrifying Jaguar makes sense. Jaguar should focus on Sportscars, crossovers and the XJ. Land Rover can handle anything else.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.