The Possibility of a Hotter Honda HR-V Emerges

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Suffice it to say no one was talking about Honda’s HR-V subcompact crossover until this news broke. It sells well, quite well, but the little ute — like most subcompact crossovers — may as well be invisible.

What are people suddenly talking about? The emergence of an HR-V Sport on the other side of the Atlantic, boasting a turbocharged 1.5-liter VTEC four-cylinder that’s good for 180 horsepower — just like the one found in the Civic Sport.

That mill generates 177 lb-ft of torque, which, while not as potent as the version found in the Si, is a considerable step up from the UK-market HR-V’s naturally aspirated 1.5-liter base engine, which generates 126 hp and 114 lb-ft of torque. North American HR-Vs benefit from a 1.8 base mill capable of getting the little ute out of its own way. Still, the 1.8L remains the only engine available, providing owners with just 127 lb-ft to go with its 141 ponies, even in the U.S.-market Sport trim.

Besides the new engine, the Brits gain a black mesh grille to replace the horrible, Acura-esque chrome blade that took over the HR-V’s face following a recent refresh, 18-inch wheels, and a tuned suspension to cut down on body roll in corners. The HR-V rolls a lot, if I recall correctly. It’s worth noting that the UK model, due out early next year, comes only in front-wheel drive guise and carries either a six-speed manual or a CVT.

So, that’s great for the long-suffering motorists of the UK, but what about us? We have the car and the engine; what about a pair-up? Thus far, Honda’s staying tight-lipped on the availability of the engine coming to the North American HR-V, though there’s no reason for it not to. “Sport” should mean something.

The HR-V’s competition is heating up considerably. Just this year, we’ve seen the introduction of the Ford EcoSport, Hyundai Kona, and Nissan Kicks in the smallest CUV space. U.S. volume is lower in 2018, too, with sales down by 6.7 percent through the end of October.

It might not be a vehicle you care about, but others might — and light trucks are where Honda’s growth lies. Giving the consumer reason not to choose the Kona turbo (175 hp, 195 lb-ft) would surely work to Honda’s advantage.

[Image: Honda]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Carrera Carrera on Nov 30, 2018

    The HRV isn't a bad mini SUV. I test drove a manual LX. It was very slow though and very loud at highway speeds. The 1,5T engine would do wonders, at least to the acceleration.

  • Eliyahu Eliyahu on Dec 01, 2018

    While we're at it, how about the 2.0 turbo in the CR-V?

  • Wjtinfwb Looks in decent nick for a Junkyard car. Other than the interior being partially gutted for some trim pieces, you could probably drive it out of the junkyard. Maybe a transmission issue and the cars value precluded a $2k or more fix? J cars were pathetic when introduced in '82 and never really got any better. But GM did sort out most of the reliability issues and with a modicum of maintenance these would run a long time if you could stand the boredom. Guess this owner couldn't.
  • GS340Pete I see a lot of these on the road. I can't remember the last time I saw one on my local Chevy dealership's lot. They've never in my memory had a few lined up with balloons. Short sighted to kill it off? Perhaps. But I certainly think the rows of $65k and up trucks is short sighted. That's going to bite soon. Looks like they're piling up already.And what about the Trax? Malibu or Trax? Gotta be honest, I'd pick the Trax.Although it should have 50 more HP IMHO. And why are so many preaching doom about the 'wet belt' engine?RIP, Malibu. Ride the highway in the sky with the Impala (talk about short sighted.)
  • ToolGuy GM didn't care about these and you shouldn't either. 😉
  • FreedMike Yet another GM Deadly Sin: trot out something in what was a very competitive and important market segment that hadn't been restyled in 11 model years, and was based on a platform that was over 20 years old, and expect people would be dumb enough to buy it over a Corolla or Civic (or a Focus, for that matter).
  • TheMrFreeze Makes you wonder if he's seeing something with Stellantis he doesn't like and wanted out as a result. As somebody with three FCA vehicles in their driveway, Stellantis is sounding more and more like DaimlerChrysler 2024 🤬
Next