Cadillac Packing Its Bags, Heading Back to Detroit

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It tried to make it in the big city but, after a few years on its own in New York, the Cadillac brand is headed home to mom and pop.

Cadillac President Steve Carlisle, who took over from Johan de Nysschen in April, confirmed the return in a Wall Street Journal interview. The brand’s abandonment of its high-class SoHo office space ends a strange and tumultuous period in Cadillac history.

Carlisle says the move aims to place executives in close proximity to General Motors’ design and engineering hub in Warren, Michigan. There’s a product offensive underway, the first vehicle of which is the just-launched AT4 compact crossover. Two sedans and another crossover will follow in short order.

“We have a huge number of launches ahead of us,” Carlisle said. “We’ve got to think about how we take inefficiencies out of the communication process between the Cadillac team and the GM partners.”

We’d be curious to hear what Carlisle and other Cadillac brass say off the record. The decision to move Cadillac’s HQ away from GM and into the tony center of America’s largest, wealthiest, and most culturally diverse city shocked many, including native Detroiters and Cadillac purists, but there rationale provided wasn’t threadbare. Cadillac had a modern, upscale image to cultivate, and a stigma to shed. It also wanted to distance itself from GM brass.

de Nysschen, known for his hard-headed approach, hoped that distancing the brand from the automaker would help its product in two ways: GM wouldn’t interfere so much, and Cadillac employees would could gain insight into the luxury market (and buyers) by leaving the Midwest behind. Talent would join customers in gravitating towards to the brand.

Product was slow to come, which isn’t New York’s fault. In the meantime, Cadillac sales slipped, dragged down by the increasingly slow-selling ATS and CTS models, despite the XT5 being a hit. During this foray into the city, observers questioned the utility (and optics) of Cadillac House, situated on the ground floor of the brand’s Soho offices. To many, the Cadillac brand oozes America, all of America, which is something that can’t be captured by displaying a car model in a rotating gallery and café. The brand stood to gain, but also to lose.

The Book by Cadillac subscription service, formed during the NYC jaunt, remains a work in progress, and its former head — “Dare Greatly” marketing guru Melody Lee — resigned in early August.

Despite the brand’s impending return to Detroit, Cadillac House will remain open, Carlisle said, providing influential New Yorkers with exposure to the brand’s vehicles and heritage. We’re likely to see a different backdrop in marketing materials, however.

As for Cadillac’s HQ, the suburban life awaits. Carlisle said the brand has secured space near the Warren development hub.

[Images: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 84 comments
  • Buickman Buickman on Sep 28, 2018

    products are fine, it is the marketing, absolutely horrible marketing that has drove all GM brands down and is keeping them down. at GM the results don't change, only the excuses.

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Oct 04, 2018

    I'm not sure I have a real opinion on whether it made sense for Cadillac to have its HQ in NYC. I can grasp the notion of wanting to have the vibe of a particular place as an inspiration and for setting one's perceptual lenses. And I can certainly understand wanting to have your local management set apart from the corporate office to reduce groupthink. But "improving communication with GM partners"? It's 2018, everyone has Skype, Webex, and bluetooth. Many if not most of these partners are on the other side of the planet, not the other side of of the complex or even the other side of town. Shifting one timezone won't make it appreciably easier to collaborate. Why don't they just admit they were spending a lot of money on an office that wasn't giving their mojo a boost and they wanted to redirect that elsewhere?

  • CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
Next