The Price Is Right: GM Axes Cost of Numerous SUVs

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Generally when we write about sticker prices for the upcoming model year, it’s to document a price hike – sometimes minor, sometimes major. Rarely does a manufacturer cut prices, especially in a hot segment.

However, it appears that’s exactly what The General is doing across three of its brands. A few machines take a haircut and give up some standard equipment, while others will simply have a Monroney bearing a smaller number next year.

According to CarsDirect, who dug into GM’s 2019 order guides, mid-level trims of various crossovers and SUVs are being repositioned a bit. For example, the 2019 Equinox 3LT, a trim which sits roughly in the middle of that model’s byzantine range, will now command $30,495 of the finest American dollars. That is $1,200 cheaper than last year.

However, the Driver Confidence Package – a feature that includes blind-spot and lane-departure warning systems, parking sensors, and a few other items – that was standard equipment has vanished. In its place, customers can pony up $1,545 for a Confidence & Convenience Package, an option that includes the aforementioned items plus dual-zone climate control, remote start, and heated seats.

The names of these option packages make me chuckle. It is this author’s opinion that any machine costing north of $30,000 should already include a great amount of convenience. As for the confidence, well, you’re on your own there.

Also, safety nannies like forward collision warnings were standard on all-wheel drive Equinox machines (Equinoxes? Equini?) whether customers wanted them or not. Now, they’re optional. This change shaves just under $2,000 off the price.

Its big brother, the Traverse LT (with leather) bins its standard 20-inch wheels and Bose sound system, cutting the price to $39,995. This will allow GM to advertise the thing as “starting under $40,000. Adding them back in jacks the sticker to $43,090. Last year’s truck included that equipment and was priced at $42,695.

Over on the Buick side of the showroom, the Encore’s top-rung Premium trim is AWOL, bringing the price of the most costly Encore down to $31,795 from $33,095. I will now pause to collect myself after realizing one can spec an Encore to that level of financial imprudence. Optional gear previously reserved for the Premium is now available on the Essence.

The Enclave drops its sticker price by a not-insignificant $2,300, down to $42,995. This is surely a play to add value and boost its market share, as the machine’s equipment levels remain the same.

Mid-level SLT trims at GMC are dropping by $500 on the Terrain and Acadia. On Terrain, that reduces the walk from a base model to just $2,800. If more people step up to the SLT from SLE, this may turn into a situation where a price cut actually encouraged people to spend more. By dropping the SLT’s price, it is possible that a few extra shoppers will pop for the snazzier trim. GMC also seems to be bundling adaptive cruise with their driver assistance tech package, adding value to that option and making it a better buy.

One thing left unmentioned (and that savvy shoppers should watch out for) is an increase in destination fees. Tacking on an extra two or three hundred dollars to that line of the sticker is a common way to increase transaction prices.

[Images: General Motors]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Thejohnnycanuck Thejohnnycanuck on Jun 22, 2018

    "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance then baffle them with bullshit." Not sure who first came up with that but I'll bet you dollars to lug nuts it was a GM employee.

  • Jpolicke Jpolicke on Jun 23, 2018

    Bad move by GM. Instead of building value the way Nissan did with the Kicks'including the safety features even in the base models, GM pulls them out and then gouges you to put them back in. This should help GM fall to the back when safety ratings rank carmakers on equipment when theirs is "Available" and the competition's is "Standard". Throwing out a lowball sticker price on a base model isn't going to fool many people. For me the "base price" is the price for the least expensive model that has my must-have features. If I have to go up 3 trim levels to get heated seats, which I demand, then that's the base price of your vehicle to me.

  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
Next