2018 New York Auto Show Recap - Optimism in the City

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Outside of my hometown of Chicago, New York City remains one of my favorite metropolises. I don’t know why – Manhattan is overstuffed with cars and people, garbage is put out on the sidewalks, hotel rooms are no oasis from street noise, and most goods and services are way too expensive.

Perhaps New York has a unique sort of charm that compensates for all its flaws, some sort of charisma that continues to exist despite the continuing transformation of Manhattan into a living Disney city for the wealthy.

I mean, in what other city would I be brazenly approached by a young man trying to sell me cocaine as I walked back to my hotel after some late-night pizza (partake, I did not. Drugs aren’t my thing. Pizza was good, though) while almost within sight of the most famous urban intersection in the world – one that was undoubtedly crowded to the gills even at that hour? In what other city would I have a surreal on-street argument with a fellow pedestrian over an innocent, touristy picture I took of a street sign? There’s this “only in New York” feeling, a sense that certain things happen to you that just wouldn’t elsewhere.

It’s the kind of place where you can swear bloody murder because the F train didn’t show, but find value in the 40-minute walk across lower Manhattan you undertake instead, all because you don’t feel like doing the logical thing and hailing a cab. SoHo, Little Italy, and Chinatown all look much better from on foot.

I took that walk to go see the new AT4 trim level of the 2019 GMC Sierra, one that likely won’t be seen much on NYC streets. That was two days, give or take, before the first press day of the 2018 New York Auto Show. Three days almost to the minute after I saw that new truck, I looked out the window of my plane as it took off from LaGuardia, hoping for one last glimpse at the skyline and a few more seconds of reflection on the show – but gray skies clouded my vision and my eyes involuntarily shut as the post-show fatigue hit.

When I awoke over Lake Michigan, I started mulling over a show that was busy but not insanely so. There was a little something for everyone, from mainstream sedans to compact crossovers to concepts to a rear-drive Lincoln SUV. Sure, some things were missing, as Bark notes, but unlike this year’s Detroit show, which was truck-centric, New York sort of touched all bases. Fitting, since the Mets were wrapping their first game of the season as my cab dropped me off at the airport, within sight of Citi Field.

I walked away from the show with a strange sense of optimism – I found myself liking the products on the floor, at least at first glance, more than I typically do.

Let’s start with Nissan. The current-gen Altima has been the forgotten one in the midsize sedan class almost since it launched. I’ve always found it perfectly pleasant to drive, but also extremely easy to forget. It’s not fun to drive like a Mazda 6, nor is it a jack of all trades like the Camry. The last time I drove one, I remembered it more for the fuel economy and trunk space (ample room for four adults’ luggage) than for any other reason. Large, comfortable, fuel efficient, and bland as hell – that was my take.

Nissan learned its lesson. Not only in the styling department – the new Altima borrows so much from the larger Maxima that I kept calling it by the other’s name – but in other ways, too. For one, the brand is bringing the variable-compression turbo tech from the Infiniti QX50 into the Altima. For another, the Altima is now the first Nissan sedan to ever offer AWD in the U.S. ProPilot Assist, which allows for limited autonomous driving, is also available. All of this shows me Nissan is making an effort to get buyers that aren’t fleet managers to pay attention to the Altima again.

Next up on my list is Volkswagen. The Atlas Cross Sport Concept made me roll my eyes – yay, a five-seat Atlas! You can sort of achieve the same thing by buying a Tiguan and folding down the useless third row. The Tanoak truck concept, though – funny name aside, I do want. I’m a sucker for car-like midsize pickups like the Ridgeline, probably because I live in a city and the big cowboy Cadillacs don’t work for me. I really hope it gets built.

Moving on, I dig the new Toyota RAV4 and its more-rugged styling. But let’s face it, it could look like the automotive equivalent of a platypus and Toyota would move as many as it can build.

I also have cautious optimism for the Acura RDX, but recent brand history is going to be a bit hard to overcome.

Now to the disappointments. I have little to say about the Subaru Forester because I didn’t get much time near it, but I am bummed there’s one less manual transmission option out there, and sad to see the XT trim go.

I find the Aviator perfectly fine but I worry about using a smartphone as a key – the TTAC staff is even more verklempt about the possibly of not having a fob.

Then there’s the Cadillac XT4. I wrote the post on it, and as I went through the specs my initial take was that it was just par for the course for the class. I thought it looked OK in photos. But seeing it up close – well, I don’t feel as good about it. The front-end styling is attractive enough, but Matt Posky and I took note of the plastic cladding, with Matt being especially repulsed. The whole package felt underdone, like a steak taken off the grill too soon.

That’s unacceptable for a $35K vehicle that moves into the $40K range with popular options and will compete in the luxury class. It’s almost as if Cadillac thought that slapping its name on a compact crossover will be enough. And maybe, given the popularity of crossovers, that’s the correct thinking, at least from a sales perspective. But it feels like a disservice to a proud brand that still offers up good product and just dropped a honkin’ V8 into the CT6 V-Sport.

Maybe the XT4 will drive well enough to assuage my concerns. We shall see. Right now, though, I am not optimistic.

Not optimistic regarding the XT4, sure, but overall feeling better about the slate of unveils at an auto show than I’ve felt in a while. And I didn’t even mention all of them – I only had so much time and wasn’t able to spend much of it at Kia or Hyundai. I’ve also glossed over the Mazda Kai Concept which, despite what Mazda PR won’t say, is almost certainly the next 3 (I dig it), the next Corolla (thumbs up), and the Honda Insight (intriguing), as well as the Genesis concept I never got near.

New York’s auto show has always struck me as contradictory – an auto show in a place where I’d rather do anything but drive? New York may not be the most natural city for an auto show, but so what? Somewhere between the $16 sandwiches (not a typo) and $8 beers, the city that never stops lightening your wallet still manages to serve as a good host.

Now, about that VW kastenwagen…

[Images © 2018 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • DEVILLE88 DEVILLE88 on Apr 03, 2018

    I like the cady, the other 2 dont care for. I wouldnt waste my time or money to go to the auto show as it's got to be the most underwhelming pile of cars ever. The bright spot? The Cadillac Escala hope they bulid it. this is really what Cady needs. if they dont produce it as is..............they truly are stupid!!

  • Slavuta Slavuta on Apr 03, 2018

    "Perhaps New York has a unique sort of charm ..." what charm? If you said Boston or Munich...

  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
  • Ajla Remember when Cadillac introduced an entirely new V8 and proceeded to install it in only 800 cars before cancelling everything?
  • Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
Next