Yes, There's a Rotary Engine Coming to a Mazda Vehicle Next Year, but It's Not the Main Event

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If you’re prone to daydreaming about slinky roadsters and curvaceous coupes powered by a high-revving rotary engine, this news might disappoint.

Mazda, one of a dwindling handful of automakers not in possession of an electric (or even hybrid) vehicle, plans to change that status next year with the introduction of a small battery-powered car. Coming along for the ride — at least in one variant — is a rotary gas engine designed to go unnoticed by the driver.

Speaking to Dutch outlet ZERauto.nl, Martijn ten Brink, vice president of sales for Mazda Motor Europe, said the electric vehicle and its range-extended sibling will appear in 2019. This jibes with what global powertrain head Mitsuo Hitomi said late last year.

Mazda loves gasoline engines, and internal combustion technology remains the major focus of its long-term planning. The mainly sparkless Skyactiv-X four-cylinder gas engine is proof of this. Still, Mazda can’t shy from technological advancements in the electric car field forever, and the upcoming EV should arrive at the same time as the new crop of fuel-efficient compacts.

Sharing a new Small Car Platform with the next-generation Mazda 2, 3, and CX-3, the unnamed EV will debut with dimensions similar to the 3, possible as a “crossover-like model,” ten Brink said.

For drivers worried about running dry while miles from a plug, Mazda will offer the option of a “a range extender in the form of a wankel engine,” the executive added. As there’s only so much battery space beneath a vehicle designed for all types of propulsion, range and battery size should be mid-pack. Having a rotary on board — one designed solely as a generator — not only eliminates fear of being stranded without a power source in the middle of nowhere, it also broadens the model’s appeal.

Not that sales are a huge consideration. Mazda’s treating the upcoming global model as something of an experiment. “Whether we sell 5,000 or 10,000 of them, we are going to learn a lot from them,” Martijn ten Brink said.

Mounted flat, the rotary generator will reportedly be no larger than a showbox, with related hardware expanding the powerplant’s footprint to that of two shoeboxes. The smooth-running engine, positioned low in the vehicle, should go unnoticed when in operation. (Hardly the spiritual driving experience of past rotaries, but at least it keeps the engine type alive.)

If all this talk of electric vehicles and crossovers has you feeling listless, fear not. There’s still a fire burning at Mazda HQ for a true rotary-powered sports car. Unfortunately, no shortage of uncertainty surrounds this future mystery model, which clearly isn’t at the top of the automaker’s to-do list.

[Image: Mazda]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Mar 06, 2018

    The rotary has to burn a little oil injected with the gas, to lubricate the apex and side seals. How are they going to account for that? A separate oil reservoir, like a DEF tank?

  • HotPotato HotPotato on Mar 06, 2018

    Recently I drove the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and thought it was brilliant but flawed: brilliant as an electric vehicle, and flawed once the noisy, underpowered, fuel-swilling 4-cylinder generator came on. "If it's going to get the same dismal highway MPG as a non-hybrid CUV once the battery's flat anyway," I thought, "then it would be better if they used a butter-smooth Wankel for the generator." Yes, Wankels are hilariously inefficient, but they're vibration free and compact, the better to leave room for the gas tank. Mazda has done this trick before with a Japan-market extended-range electric Mazda 2; if they can do the same in a USEFUL size CUV (CX-5 or larger, Mazda, none of this CX-3 bullpucky) then they will make a real impact. But the world does NOT need another tiny EV.

  • EBFlex Amazing they finally made a good decision in NY. Golf clap
  • EBFlex Not at all. The solution to congestion is to make more lanes for vehicles. No bike lanes, no trains, none of it. Another solution is to make your public transit a place people actually want to be and not a septic tank of violent criminals and drug users.
  • Firehawk I had two of these with lean and misfire codes. He changed the plugs you say??? has he inspected them? One of the two times it was a brand new plug that cracked. The other lean condition was some random threaded hole on the bottom of the throttle body that needed to be closed up, whatever was in there came out and was letting a lot of unmetered air into the intake. I love the Mark VIIIs my 97 and 98 would still be here today if it weren't for other drivers and their proclivity for hitting things. 97 was rear ended and totaled the 98 was t-boned while parked. Moved on to bigger Lincolns. Got an MKT and Aviator now.
  • Seth1065 Hell No, why should I as a driver have to pay for the subway repairs? I already pay over $250 a month in tolls to get into NYC, ( all of it not just Midtown) ( do not tell me to move closer I am less than 20 miles from midtown) the roads are crap as it is now , the trains are not much better and I have no faith in the port Authority ( referred around metro NY as the 51 state) to spend the money properly. They want no drivers in midtown , they already allowed over a 1000 parking spots to be taken up by restaurants out door dining. Most folks can not afford to live in midtown ( and the ones who can may not want to live in a city) but the city wants its workers back in their office buildings. People need to drive into the city for various reasons and they work there, want to eat at a restaurant trucks need to deliver food there, they will pay and pass teh bill on to the restaurant who will pass it on to the consumer. I did laugh yesterday when I read NYC has already spent a half billion dollars on the trackers. BTW I am pretty sure port authority personnel do not pay for their expats so who should they car. Show me a plan where everyone pays for this , train riders, subway riders, car drivers and I may agree but until then I will just not go to the city as often. I do think this will pass around Nov. 8 after election day. and a train to midtown from LGA , yeah that will happen , cost ten billion and 90 years. they can not even finish the 2 ave subway and that's been going on about 75 years at least.
  • Bkojote Hi, actual city planner here. Congestion pricing In NYC? Yes. Hell yes. Absolutely hell yes. Like empirically we've already got proof the answer is yes, there's not even a discussion about this anymore, the Robert Moses experiment is 50+ years old. We might as well be arguing if the earth is flat. Now build the freaking rail link from LGA airport I don't want to be inhaling car freshener fumes from my crappy Uber.
Next