Seeking Global Domination, Nissan Hunts New Markets for the Leaf

by Steph Willems

Published: February 17th, 2018

seeking global domination nissan hunts new markets for the leaf

After becoming something close to a joke over the past couple of years, the once-groundbreaking Nissan Leaf enters 2018 with a new skin, larger battery, and enhanced range. Next year brings an optional battery upgrade, finally giving the five-door EV a range capable of challenging Tesla and General Motors.

Now that it has a competitive vehicle positioned as a value pick in a growing segment, Nissan wants everyone to get a chance to buy one, no matter where they live. It may have shied away from sales targets in the U.S., but Nissan’s not dialing back its global ambitions.

As reported by Wards Auto, Nissan has decided to launch the Leaf in seven new markets this year. The announcement, made at Nissan Futures, a Singapore meeting of industry executives, government officials, and media from the Asia and Oceania region, heralds the Leaf’s status as a truly global product. Buyers in Australia, Hong Kong, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, and Thailand will soon have access to the car.

Japanese customers got first dibs on the new model, which went on sale last October. 2018 Leafs began rolling onto dealer lots in North America last month, and European sees its first second-gen models this month.

While that’s already plenty of exposure, Nissan seems ready to launch the Leaf in any market where the Leaf might prove popular. Market analyst Frost & Sullivan presented research at Nissan Futures showing an average of 37 percent of would-be buyers in Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam and the Philippines would consider an electric vehicle for their next car. With the right incentives, Nissan’s Leaf could become their top choice, Frost & Sullivan believes.

The 2018 Leaf’s 40 kWh battery pack gives it a U.S. range of 151 miles. With an entry price of $29,990 before a $885 delivery charge and a $7,500 tax credit, the Leaf undercuts the Bolt and Model 3 by over $5,000, though a longer range model — promised to have over 200 miles of range — will surely narrow that price gap.

[Image: Nissan]

#2018NissanLeaf #ElectricVehicles #EmergingMarkets #EVs #Markets #Nissan #NissanLeaf #Overseas

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

6 of 16 comments

Brandloyalty on Feb 17, 2018

There are lots of Leaf's running around where I live. A lot of them would have been bought used, with no subsidy. This talk of EV Luddites is a corruption of the meaning of "Luddite", and evokes images of nut cases shouting at windmills.

Like Reply
- See 3 previous
- Asdf on Feb 18, 2018
  
  The used EVs would have been subsidized when new, which would have affected their sales price as used, so the issue of subsidies is still relevant. The term Luddite is actually strangely fitting in this context, because it's used about people opposed to technological change, and the EV Luddites are ferociously opposed to the radical technological changes that are needed to make EVs a viable proposition, and they deride and ridicule those who have the audacity to point out this obvious fact, whereas normal, sane people would merely nod in agreement.
  
  Like
- Nick_515 on Feb 18, 2018
  
  @Asdf it doesn't fit at all Asdf. Your use of the term is a sad caricature of the historical context in which it was born. Luddites are not 'ferociously opposed' to radical technological changes. They were people who mistook machines, as opposed to the social reorganization of production, as the cause of increasing pauperization of the working class. Instead of confronting said reorganization, they thought they could stop its detrimental effects by attacking machines. They couldn't.
  
  Like
- Brandloyalty on Feb 18, 2018
  
  @Nick_515 I've mentioned before asdf's misuse of the luddite label. His continued misuse is just virtue signalling anyway. Asdf, could you elaborate on "the EV Luddites are ferociously opposed to the radical technological changes that are needed to make EVs a viable proposition,". Because the way I read it that comment makes no sense. As for the price of used Leaf's, if this link works it will show the asking prices for them near where I live. The prices don't seem to have been diminished much by the original $5000 rebate. https://vancouver.craigslist.ca/search/sss?query=nissan%20leaf&sort=rel
  
  Like
- Maymar on Feb 18, 2018
  
  @brandloyalty I strongly doubt any EV advocate would be opposed to 400+ mile ranges and 5 minute charging times, but our refusal to froth with outrage that they aren't available now apparently means we hate the idea, I guess.
  
  Like
Healthy skeptic on Feb 18, 2018

I never thought I'd say this, but this car makes the first gen version look quite attractive. Actually, the first gen version had a kind of funky charm to it. Every time I see this car, I want to "close" the hood.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.