Ballooning U.S. Cadillac Transaction Prices Hide a Not-so-silver Lining

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

In 2017, the average U.S. Cadillac buyer walked out of the dealership after signing over $54,488 for a new vehicle. That’s almost $6,000 more than the average sticker in the luxury field, placing Cadillac among the upper echelon of premium cars.

However, the brand’s skyrocketing average transaction price — up 25 percent over the past five years — comes as the brand weathers a sales downturn in the U.S. market. That lofty 2017 figure has plenty to do with the models customers aren’t buying.

It’s starkly clear that 2017 was a terrible year for traditional cars, and not just at Cadillac. The public’s rapid, ongoing shift to crossovers and SUVs meant 2017 sales of Cadillac’s lesser offerings — the ATS, CTS, and XTS sedans — declined by the order of 39.1 percent, 35 percent, and 26.6 percent, respectively.

Overall, the brand shed 8 percent of its volume last year. Those sales were 14.3 percent lower than 2013, Cadillac’s best post-recession year.

As fewer buyers took home a relatively low-buck ATS, volume of the high-zoot Escalade and long-wheelbase ESV variant remained strong, declining by just 2.6 and 5.1 percent, respectively, last year. The midsized XT5 crossover also remained strong. As it sheds sedan buyers, the greater presence of SUVs in Cadillac’s mix is boosting the average transaction price. Now, all Cadillac needs to do is field more vehicles buyers actually want.

It’s working on that. As Automotive News reports, Cadillac President Johan de Nysschen is more concerned with the brand’s fiscal health than reaching arbitrary sales targets. On the retail side, his initially controversial Project Pinnacle dealer overhaul is “doing as it has been set up to do,” de Nysschen said recently in Detroit.

On the product front, this year brings a XT4 compact crossover designed to mine gold in a very lucrative segment. A larger crossover is in the works, as are two sedans strategically designed to replace the ATS, CTS, and XTS after 2019. GM’s chief financial officer, Chuck Stevens, expects a doubling of Cadillac’s profits by 2021.

The U.S. market isn’t everything anymore, so Cadillac’s hardly in dire financial straits. Chinese buyers took home more Cadillacs than American customers last year, with the brand’s volume in that country rising 50.8 percent. Outside of the U.S. and China, sales rose 10.1 percent. This makes for a 15.5 percent global sales increase for the 2017 calendar year, something any brand would be happy to see.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 26 comments
  • EX35 EX35 on Jan 30, 2018

    I am deciding between the 535i/d and CTS v-sport (both CPOs) for my next purchase. The CTS is a compelling car.

    • Bd2 Bd2 on Feb 01, 2018

      For handling/driving dynamics, it's a good bit superior to the Bimmer.

  • Ron rufo Ron rufo on Sep 30, 2022

    or, maybe it's the poor quality of Cadillac. I have a lexis 300 with almost 245,000 miles and it runs great and has no issues. I had a cadillac ELR and although it looked great, it spent more time being repaired that being driven.

  • CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
Next