The Future Looks Swedish? Volvo Inks a Deal to Supply Uber's Driverless Dreams

by Matthew Guy

Published: November 21st, 2017

the future looks swedish volvo inks a deal to supply uber s driverless dreams

Building on a strategic partnership announced in August last year, Volvo has signed a framework agreement with Uber to sell “tens of thousands” of autonomous driving compatible base vehicles between 2019 and 2021.

While reading the report, it was important for this author to keep in mind the challenge in affixing an actual definition to the words autonomous driving. There have been shouty voices in various parts of the internet disputing the terms autonomous, Autopilot, and self-driving. There is merit to these arguments.

Nevertheless, Volvo is working with Uber to create technology that will allow vehicles to move about without a driver providing input 100 percent of the time.

The non-exclusive agreement — and it is important to note the word non-exclusive – furthers the partnership between Volvo and Uber while also writing a new chapter in the convergence of car makers and tech companies. Or, if one doesn’t view it as a full chapter, it’s at least more than a simple footnote.

The base for these vehicles is being developed on Volvo’s modular Scalable Product Architecture, which was developed in-house by the engineering boffins at the Swedish company. It is currently used on Volvo’s top-of-the-line 90 series machines, such as the XC90 and gorgeous (but special-order only) V90. The new XC60 midsize SUV deploys this Scalable Product Architecture as well.

“Our aim is to be the supplier of choice for AD ride-sharing service providers globally,” said Håkan Samuelsson, president and chief executive. “Today’s agreement with Uber is a primary example of that strategic direction.”

Volvo Cars’ engineers have apparently worked with engineers from Uber to develop the XC90 premium SUVs that are planned to be supplied to Uber. The base vehicles incorporate safety, redundancy, and core autonomous (there’s that word again) driving technologies which are required for Uber to add its own self-driving technology.

The relationship is not monogamous. At the same time as providing Uber with AD-compatible cars, Volvo will use the same base vehicle in the development of its own independent autonomous car strategy, which is planned to culminate in the release of its first fully autonomous car (Volvo’s language) in 2021.

[Images: Volvo Cars]

#Autonomous #S90 #Uber #V90 #Volvo #XC90

Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments

Join the conversation

3 comments

Asdf on Nov 21, 2017

The headline makes no sense. "The Future Looks Chinese" would have made more sense, given the fact that Volvo is a Chinese automaker.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Garrett on Nov 21, 2017
  
  Is this just a bit of malicious code that injects itself into TTAC whenever Volvo is mentioned?
  
  Like
- Conundrum on Nov 21, 2017
  
  @Garrett For about a century, the people of Britain and Germany have been buying Fords, mistakenly believing they were actually native vehicles. Having lived there I know the average dolt on the street doesn't know or care that actually Ford is American, so the people could have avoided buying them if they cared about the national identity of the true owners. GM did the same with Vaukhall and Opel till recently. I do not see the difference between this scenario and the Chinese ownership of Volvo. Is it only an OK business tactic if Americans do it, but an unforgiveable sin when someone else does it? Apparently so, say the knuckledraggers of "Murica. What about when that $1 billion Volvo factory opens in SC in 2019?
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.