Cadillac's Throwing Shade at Lincoln (and Money at Lincoln Owners)

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Despite the addition of a corporate split grill a few years ago, there’s no denying Lincoln’s outgoing Navigator is one old piece of kit. As such, the glitzy premiere of the new-for- 2018 Navigator heralded greater full-size Lincoln SUV sales not just from new buyers, but returning ones.

Having seen what Dearborn was up to, it seems some inhabitants of the Renaissance Center decided to try and spoil Lincoln’s fun. If you’re the owner of a 1999 or newer Lincoln vehicle who’s thinking of maybe getting into a new Navigator, Cadillac would like you to know there’s 5,000 smackeroos waiting for you on the hood of your nearest Escalade.

A memo detailing the month-long, nationwide discount was just uncovered by Bloomberg, with GM confirming its authenticity.

With the revamped Escalade currently rolling into dealerships, Cadillac’s venerable Escalade is no longer the new kid on the lot. As tarted-up versions of lesser models, the Escalade and Navigator’s high MSRP represents big profits for both companies. It seems Cadillac wants to lure a few would-be Navigator buyers away.

The $5,000 discount on the purchase or lease of a 2018 Escalade can be combined with other GM offers. (Cadillac’s website now shows the offer, targeted at “customers with a Lincoln in the household.”) A base 2018 Navigator carries an MSRP of $73,250, including destination. Ford Motor Company has also applied a $1,000 lease incentive. The Escalade, on the other hand, starts at $75,290 after delivery.

With standard wheelbase, rear-drive Escalades now cheaper than a comparable Navigator (at least to Lincoln owners), what’s left for consideration is styling and content. Both models carry a jointly developed 10-speed automatic. The Cadillac, dressed in a sharp, slab-sided body that’s aging well, carries the revered 6.2-liter V8 under its hood, making 420 horsepower and 460 lb-ft of torque. Its Lincoln rival, wearing a newly angular and imposing Ford Expedition-derived body, receives a massaged version of Ford’s 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6, tuned for 450 hp and 510 lb-ft.

Will the gambit work? GM must feel it’s worth it, and a representative couldn’t resist the chance to kick some sand in Lincoln’s face.

Speaking to Bloomberg, GM spokesman Jim Cain remarked, “I don’t know that this will hurt their launch. But it is a way for Lincoln customers step up into something more meaningfully luxurious.”

Ouch. The Navigator’s decline in status, which Cain alludes to, is something Lincoln hopes to address with its new model. In any given year since the recession, Lincoln has sold roughly one-quarter to one-third of the Navigators it unloaded at the beginning of the century. Meanwhile, Cadillac regularly sells more than twice as many Escalades in a year. In October, the outgoing Navigator sold 656 units to the Escalade’s 2,079.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 24 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Nov 07, 2017

    Rising oil prices are very good for Russia, very good I tell you. Sanctions go away. Russian gangsters can buy Navigators and Escalades again.

  • DenverMike DenverMike on Nov 07, 2017

    If they weren't so scared they'd hand out $5,000 even if they bought another Navigator, as long as they test drove the Escalade in the 30 days prior. So this is very telling. In '03 I was totally oblivious to the truck market so the 1st time I saw the new generation F-150 was in the total carpet bombing by Silverado, Dodge Ram and Tundra commercials, all letting me know exactly how/where theirs are better, more capable, etc, etc. So this screamed of how I needed to go check out the all-new F-150 directly. And I bought one. GM would do themselves a huge favor by just laying low.

    • See 2 previous
    • EBFlex EBFlex on Nov 08, 2017

      @DenverMike The Escalade isn't an old dog. It was brand new just a couple years ago

  • CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
Next