Hamtramck Going Dark as GM Large Sedan Inventories Balloon

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s going to be a black Christmas at the Detroit-Hamtramck assembly plant this year. Amid rising inventory levels for the Cadillac CT6, Buick LaCrosse, Chevrolet Impala, and Chevrolet Volt, General Motors plans to shut off the lights for the rest of the year.

Blame the American consumer’s rapidly changing automotive tastes.

According to The Detroit Free Press, the shutdown impacts 1,800 workers once production begins winding down on October 20th. GM anticipates a full production stop on November 13th. Of those workers, up to 200 might not return after production restarts following the Christmas break.

In a statement, GM said the shutdown is required to “help maintain more stable production” in a time of “declining overall industry volumes.”

A quick check of the Automotive News Data Center shows ballooning supply of all four vehicles produced at the Hamtramck facility. While LaCrosse supply, measured at 284 days’ worth on October 1st, is little changed from a month earlier, it’s leaps and bounds above the healthy industry norm of 60-70 days. CT6 inventories stand at 106 days’ worth, while Impala supply has grown from 45 to 67 days’ worth. The Volt, which now finds itself outsold by its all-electric Bolt sibling, showed a 107-day supply as of October 1st, up 10 days’ worth from September.

Awash with large sedans at a time when consumers can’t get enough crossovers and SUVs, Hamtramck’s plight mirrors that of other traditional car-producing plants. Models like the LaCrosse and Impala are no longer the sales juggernaut they were just a decade ago.

In 2007, Chevrolet’s Impala pulled in over 300,000 U.S. buyers, but year-to-date sales are already well below 2016’s tally — a year sales dropped below the six-figure mark for the first time. LaCrosse sales dropped 42 percent in September, year-over-year. (That September 2016 sales figure represented a 51-percent drop from 2015.) Cadillac’s CT6, which went on sale in March of last year, saw sales drop 29 percent in September, year-over-year.

As for the technologically innovative Volt, the second-generation model saw sales fall 28 percent in September, year-over-year. Despite last year being the Volt’s best sales year since its introduction, 2017’s monthly sales have fallen below 2016 figures since April.

Of course, Detroit-Hamtramck is no stranger to layoffs, be it temporary or permanent. GM idled the plant for three weeks in January, with a second shift cut in March.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 38 comments
  • Zackman Zackman on Oct 14, 2017

    Man, I wish I were in the market for a new Impala. LT2, in dark red, please.

    • Ajla Ajla on Oct 14, 2017

      You already have the best FWD Impala. Just keep it until one of you isn't running any longer.

  • MWolf MWolf on Oct 15, 2017

    So, gonna paint with a broad brush here. GM has issues selling their big sedans. But so does everyone else. Why? Bear with me here: Boring cars have been the morm. We'll focus on GM. The Impala got boring and bland (inside and out, in all ways) until its refresh. Cadillac forgot how to make Caddillacs, instead opting to chase the Germans. Little did they know that simply improving quality and performance while still respecting their heritage and not using alpha-numeric gibberish would have done wonders. Do you think "Cadillac" when you think "CTS" or "CT6"? Buick? Used to be great. Let's kill everything that people liked about the brand, including models, and appeal neither to old or young buyers. None of these are bad cars. But you wouldn't know that based off of the recent past. Even I, as a GM fan, see Ford and even Toyota as enticing lately. They shot themselves in the foot. People made other choices when sedans got bland. They improved things, but now they don't believe anyone is intetested in them because they created the disinterest. So now the marketing sucks. Can't sell what you don't talk about, right? I couldn't tell you a damn thing about any of these sedans if I wasn't into cars enough to seek the information myself. I can tell you ALL about the Equinox just from marketing.

  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
Next