Genesis Motors U.S. Dealer Network Will Be Separate From Hyundai by 2020

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Hyundai’s Genesis Motors offshoot intends to finalize its transition into an entirely separate U.S. dealer network within the next three years.

The process of building an undetermined number of distinct Genesis outlets has not yet begun, but it’s clear the brand is well aware of the limitations with which it’s currently operating.

“The reality is, many, many luxury customers tell us they love our products, they’re amazing, but I’m not going into a Hyundai store to buy it,” U.S. Genesis boss Erwin Raphael tells Automotive News.

No kidding.

All of Hyundai’s 835 U.S. dealers are currently permitted to sell the Genesis G70, not a surprising fact given the very same car’s preceding status as the second-generation Hyundai Genesis sedan. Roughly 40 percent of Hyundai’s dealers also opted to sell the G90 flagship. Doing so meant building a separate in-showroom boutique for the luxury brand’s two (soon to be three) sedans.

By the end of 2020, those 352 mini-showrooms, which average around one G90 sale per month — will have reached their best before date, forced to house mere Hyundais such as the Veloster N or Santa Fe Limited Ultimate in order to be of use.

For the time being, “It’s really hard to have the two cultures cohabitating,” Raphael says.

From the get-go, it was clear the Genesis Motors leadership wasn’t keen on the quick launch phase that necessitated cohabitation. Only months after selling the first Genesis cars in America, Raphael said that the number of dealers was “too high.” Hyundai Canada’s decision to keep Genesis G80 and G90 customers away from Hyundai dealers worked, but it also had the side effect of, to be frank, keeping G80 and G90 customers away.

One year after launching, as Genesis prepared to unveil the G70 that would (hopefully) produce more meaningful volume, it became clear that the way forward for the brand’s U.S. dealer network did not in any way involve the current formula. “We do in fact have to expedite our process of separating our brands,” Raphael said in August.

Was it all a big mistake? Hyundai Motor America’s launch of the Genesis brand represented “the easiest, least-painful route in the short term,” according to Andrew DiFeo, Hyundai’s National Dealer Council chairman. But with no pain comes little gain. The method “affected the brand negatively in the long-term,” DiFeo said.

Yet after 352 dealers invested heavily in the future of Genesis, choosing the easy way forward “affected the brand negatively in the long term,” DiFeo says.

Hyundai now sets the stage for a 2018-2020 restructuring of its Genesis network, a process set to be undertaken less than two years after the first copies of the G80 and G90 were sold. Deciding to avoid such a painful process would be a mistake — a fledgling Korean luxury marque can’t be so closely and so permanently linked to Hyundai. Deciding to undergo a radical transformation so early in Genesis’ lifecycle will produce its own difficulties, some of which could create lasting conflict between Hyundai and the dealers responsible for selling its vehicles.

Would it have been so crazy for Genesis Motors to wait for a brand-wide launch designed to coincide with the G70’s arrival and a squadron of committed Genesis-specific dealers? Probably not. Fortunately, Genesis aims to have a six-vehicle fleet by the time its dealer network, v2.0, is ready.

[Images: Hyundai]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Dwford Dwford on Oct 03, 2017

    Plenty of people have bought Hyundai Genesis and Equus at lowly Hyundai stores over the last several years. Now that they have separated the brands, it is only logical to expect separate showrooms.

  • 87 Morgan 87 Morgan on Oct 03, 2017

    Just so I am on the same page as everyone else...Hyundai want its dealer network, who are now selling less cars than Kia, to spend more dough to have a stand alone facility so they can sell 5 cars a month. Which 5 would of course be a huge windfall since, currently the dealer network averages 1 Genesis sale a month. Because sales of luxury cars are primed to take off again. Hyundai needs CUVs and SUVs pronto, not 80k sedans. Sheesh, it is amazing the blatant stupidity on display, or perhaps it is all ego and hubris on the part of the 'home office' to prove they can out Japanese the Japanese who out in turn out germaned zee Germans. Either way, Toyota was doing well when Lexus launched and not shrinking month over month loke Hyundai.

  • CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
Next