Light Entertainment: Answers To the Matching Taillight Challenge

by Corey Lewis

Published: August 1st, 2017

light entertainment answers to the matching taillight challenge

Last week, we showed you four different vehicles, each with strikingly similar taillamps. So began the Taillamp Identification Challenge. (Un)fortunately, Flybrian was around, and came up with the correct answers just 10 minutes after the post went live.

So, the challenge was short lived, and all props go to Flybrian’s keen taillamp eye. It’s almost like he knows cars, or is a car dealer perhaps. Time for the official results.

1. Lincoln MKS

The first-generation MKS, which replaced the Town Car as Lincoln’s full-size sedan, showed up in 2009 with this familiar taillamp design.

A facelift for 2013 changed the rear lenses, making them sweeping and decidedly less upright.

2. Kia Rio 5

The Kia Rio5 (that means hatchback) is our second challenge lamp.

Between 2005 (2006 for North America) and 2009 the Rio5 sported this un-unique look, while a facelift in 2010 smoked the rear lenses and revised some of the detailing. The shape of the lens remained the same in what would be this generation’s final year.

3. Maserati Quattroporte

New for 2004, the Maserati Quattroporte sported modern, aerodynamic styling not found on Quattroporte models of yore.

Could this vehicle be the genesis of the suddenly popular lamp style? You be the judge. One more vehicle awaits.

4. Kia Amanti

The Kia Amanti was also available in 2004.

The Amanti was the top sedan offering from Kia, a premium model that soldiered on through 2009 in North America. Kia had no replacement for the Amanti on our shores until 2014, with the debut of the Cadenza.

There you have it. Four different cars from three different countries of origin, sharing a design element like it’s a bowl of chips.

[Images: Ford Motor Company, Kia Motors, Maserati]

#Design #Kia #KiaAmanti #KiaCadenza #KiaRio5 #Lincoln #LincolnMKS #Maserati #MaseratiQuattroporte #NewsBlog #UsedCars

Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 9 comments

Deanst on Aug 01, 2017

Today I saw a Hyundai cuv with amber turn signals on the bottom of the tail lights - it was oddly disconcerting.

Like Reply
- Marko on Aug 01, 2017
  
  I've seen that setup on some Kia Sportages and the Land Rover Freelander. Yes, I actually saw a running Freelander last month.
  
  Like
Marko on Aug 01, 2017

Note: the Amanti's taillights were actually horizontal (and reminded me of a Fox-Body Cougar) until about 2007.

Like Reply
- JohnTaurus on Aug 02, 2017
  
  Having driven a pre-refresh Amanti (aka Opirus in Korea), I don't hate it. Its comfortable, roomy and quiet. Its wallowy and downright slow if it's (attempting to be) driven hard, but that obviously wasn't what it was built for. It was built to be a Korean Town Car, and a Town Car isn't meant to be mistaken for a Mustang Shelby. Ever. I liked that all four windows were auto up and down. I dislike that *every* one I looked at, or came across on the internet, had peeling armrest trim on every door panel. It was best if it was black interior, then you could hardly tell, but with the light interior, it looked awful. The only thing I like about the refresh is the rear styling. The rest, meh. The center stack/console looks a lot more bland than the first one.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.