Jeep's Probably Too Important to Spin Off, but Other Brands Could Get the Heave-ho: Report

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

So, a Chinese automobile manufacturer, Great Wall Motors, would totally love it if Fiat Chrysler Automobiles flung the Jeep brand its way. Who wouldn’t? In the mid-1980s, Jeep was the ruby in AMC’s crown, and its new (and highly profitable) Cherokee line had Chrysler Corporation chairman Lee Iacocca salivating at the thought of where he could take the brand if given the chance.

Three decades later and Jeep is FCA’s biggest asset, not just due to current volume, but future volume in untapped markets. CEO Sergio Marchionne wants people the world over to drop what they’re doing and buy a Jeep. Having global Jeep models that are popular in numerous regions would act as a hedge against trouble in, say, North America, where its Chrysler, Dodge and Fiat brands aren’t exactly setting sales charts on fire.

Too big to spin off? Perhaps, but other brands in the FCA fold aren’t nearly as indispensable. With no corporate sugar daddy waiting in the wings with a checkbook, the automaker is reportedly considering spinning off a couple of brands, a new report claims.

According to sources who spoke to Bloomberg, Alfa Romeo and Maserati could be next to leave the family home and strike out on their own.

By jettisoning the two Italian luxury brands and its components division, FCA would better position itself as a volume-focused company, thus making itself more attractive to automakers that might come calling for a merger. Assuming all of the castoffs find buyers, FCA could net $14.2 billion from the sale.

Discussions among executives are ongoing, the sources claim, with a decision expected by early 2018.

Unlike Ferrari, which FCA officially gave up ownership of at the dawn of 2016, Maserati and Alfa Romeo likely wouldn’t end up as standalone, publicly traded entities. Neither brand has the same cachet as Ferrari. Still, if other automakers take up the challenge, FCA would unburden itself from pricey development costs. Maserati’s long-term plan calls for some form of electrification in each new model going forward, and Alfa finds itself struggling to meet the high sales expectations laid out by Marchionne in the not-too-distant past.

As for Jeep, the rugged brand’s $27 billion value tops that of its parent company.

“I don’t see how FCA could sell it,” industry analyst and consultant Maryann Keller told Bloomberg. “Whatever they got for it would hardly replace what they lost.”

The sources behind the spinoff scoop claim Marchionne wants to retain Jeep as the company’s breadwinner. The automaker predicts a 30-percent increase in global Jeep sales next year — a projection based on increased production in markets like Europe and Southeast Asia, as well as the growing traction of the global second-generation Compass SUV. The sky’s the limit for sales beyond that date, it seems.

With sales faltering at Chrysler and Dodge, and Fiat seemingly a lost cause in North America, the truck-only Ram brand probably wouldn’t be enough to keep FCA afloat. Compared to other companies, it certainly wouldn’t be much of a mass-market automaker.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 46 comments
  • Garrett Garrett on Aug 24, 2017

    Sell Alfa Romeo to Jaguar-Land Rover. Maserati goes to a German car company - doesn't matter which one. Both brands end up with better vehicles.

  • BigOldChryslers BigOldChryslers on Aug 25, 2017

    Sergio should cut a deal to sell 20% ownership in FCA, with a put option in the contract which can force the other party to buy the remainder of FCA at some time in the future. Then run FCA into the ground so badly that the other party will pay to get out of the contract.

  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next