Volvo Makes It Official: Polestar to Become a Standalone Brand

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Think of it as a green brand known for producing some very blue cars. Polestar, Volvo’s performance wing, will be spun off into an electrified automaker under a new plan from the Swedish car manufacturer.

Expected to do battle with the likes of Tesla and BMW’s i sub-brand, future Polestars — like their gasoline-powered predecessors — will stake out space in the performance arena, only this time in a different niche.

Volvo made the announcement today, confirming an insider-sourced report from two weeks ago. That’s right, future Polestars will ditch the Volvo logo altogether, while remaining part of Volvo Cars.

The automaker first teamed up with Polestar Performance in 1996 to assist its motorsports ventures. Together, the two companies began cranking out Polestar-tuned variants of Volvo vehicles for regular customers, providing a Scandinavian alternative to BMW’s M-badged vehicles and Mercedes-AMG rolling stock. Volvo took full ownership of Polestar in 2015.

Heading up the new brand is Thomas Ingenlath, who will relinquish his role as senior vice president of design at Volvo to don a CEO hat.

“Thomas heading up the Polestar organisation shows our commitment to establishing a truly differentiated stand-alone brand within the Volvo Car Group,” said Håkan Samuelsson, president and chief executive of Volvo Cars, in a statement.

“Polestar will be a credible competitor in the emerging global market for high performance electrified cars. With Polestar, we are able to offer electrified cars to the world’s most demanding, progressive drivers in all market segments.”

Don’t worry, traditional Polestar lovers. The company’s engineering will still find its way into regular Volvos through performance packages offered by the Polestar Engineered brand. Vivid blue S60 and V60s currently make up the entirety of Volvo’s Polestar-badged offerings, offering mondo horsepower from a heavily worked-over 2.0-liter four-cylinder.

The automaker claims Polestar’s connection to Volvo, and the ability to share platforms and components, will allow the new brand to benefit from economies of scale. “These synergies will allow it to design, develop and build world beating electrified high performance cars,” the automaker stated.

Note the repeated use of the word “electrified.” While Polestar doesn’t plan to outline its product intentions until this fall, it would seem that gasoline propulsion might not entirely disappear from its lineup. Volvo has already found success with hybrids, with more on the way. The senior company source at the core of the earlier report claimed future Polestar models would make use of Volvo’s Compact Modular Architecture, which is versatile enough for use with conventional, hybrid and electric powertrains.

[Image: Volvo Cars]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next