QOTD: What Car Do You Recommend Most Often?

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Recommending vehicles, and having those recommendations go unheeded, is a key component of your role as an automotive enthusiast.

Whether you’re known as a go-to source for vehicle recommendations because of your encyclopedic automotive knowledge, because you’re a keen driver who once raced a Spec Miata, because you’ve brilliantly chosen five consecutive impeccably reliable midsize sedans, or because (like many TTAC contributors) you spend a week with new vehicles as they enter the market, you are relied upon by friends, family, and co-workers.

When asked, what new vehicle ends up topping your Most Recommended list? Forget Consumer Reports’ recommendations and Car And Driver’s 10 Best. If a friend asks you what new car they should buy, what car is it most likely to be?

Camry? F-150? Outback? Elantra Sport? Don’t say Golf SportWagen TDI.

Yesterday, not for the first time in the recent past, a new car buyer’s wishlist presented me with an obvious answer: Kia Soul.

Kia Soul. Kia Soul. Kia Soul. Over and over again, it seems as though the typical car buyer couldn’t do much better than a Kia Soul.

Combine the mid-grade 2017 Kia Soul’s $20,695 MSRP with the $1,000 UVO Package, the 27-mpg Soul presents an undeniably attractive value quotient. You don’t need to pay a premium for all-wheel drive — Kia doesn’t even offer it. Loads of rear seat space and impressive cargo volume make the Soul a viable midsize sedan alternative. Though by no means overpowered, the Soul isn’t a slow poke. The second-generation rides and handles well, too. Naturally, as a Kia, there’s a load of equipment. And back on the Consumer Reports front, Kia is now among the most reliable car brands.

I’m not recommending the Soul to everyone. If you want an affordable luxury car, the Audi A4 is tough to beat. The Mazda CX-5 and Honda CR-V are outstanding small crossovers. Families with a wide variety of needs are well served by a Honda Odyssey. Full-size pickup trucks from Ford, General Motors, and Ram will all surprise and delight in different ways. The short-lived Ford Mustang V6 is a shockingly effective sports car alternative. And the Volkswagen Golf GTI is perhaps the best all-around vehicle for performance car lovers.

Besides, my Soul recommendation comes with three caveats. Maybe the Soul was cool in 2009, but now that Americans have snapped up more than 900,000 of them, the high sense of style is lost in ubiquity. Second, Kia has yet to install positive steering feel in the Soul. And finally, manual transmission availability is limited.

Yet time and time again, the expectations of car buyers who contact me are best met not by a Mazda MX-5 Miata or Ford F-250 or Jeep Wrangler, but rather by a Kia Soul.

What new car do you recommend most often?

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 161 comments
  • Dal20402 Dal20402 on May 16, 2017

    I end up recommending a lot of different cars, but there are a few that I recommend more often. A to B buyers who just want low TCO and reliability: Prius or Prius V depending on space needs. Outdoorsy folks who do mud and snow a lot (very common around here): Forester or Outback depending on budget. "I want a CUV": CR-V. "I want a luxury CUV": Audi Q5 for lessees or Acura RDX for owners. "I want a three-row CUV": Pilot or MDX depending on budget. I find the cars I'm commonly asked about but recommend against more interesting: Corolla (Prius is always a better answer), X3, Range Rover Evoque, Jeep Wrangler (for ordinary drivers), Jeep Cherokee. I also still recommend against VAG products for long-term owners, but if the reliability record of recent Audits stays excellent for a couple more years I may rethink that.

  • Dal20402 Dal20402 on May 16, 2017

    I end up recommending a lot of different cars, but there are a few that I recommend more often. A to B buyers who just want low TCO and reliability: Prius or Prius V depending on space needs. Outdoorsy folks who do mud and snow a lot (very common around here): Forester or Outback depending on budget. "I want a CUV": CR-V. "I want a luxury CUV": Audi Q5 for lessees or Acura RDX for owners. "I want a three-row CUV": Pilot or MDX depending on budget. I find the cars I'm commonly asked about but recommend against more interesting: Corolla (Prius is always a better answer), X3, Range Rover Evoque, Jeep Wrangler (for ordinary drivers), Tahoburbaladenali, Jeep Cherokee. I also still recommend against VAG products for long-term owners, but if the reliability record of recent Audis stays excellent for a couple more years I may rethink that.

  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
Next