Price War: Mid-Year Changes Coming as Two Rival Crossovers Battle for Sales

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

America’s insatiable crossover thirst has made the Nissan Rogue — a relative newcomer to the segment — a sales juggernaut and a top rival to the likes of the Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V.

As summer approaches, two of those vehicles are undergoing a sales strategy shift to better position the models against each other. No, one of the models isn’t the new-for 2017 CR-V. Nissan and Toyota, however, hope to draw in more customers by tweaking prices and content on the Rogue and RAV4, though the two automakers are going about it in very different ways.

According to car shopping website CarsDirect, Nissan has outfitted all versions of the Rogue with standard automatic emergency braking, rear cross-traffic alert, and blind spot warning. The changes will appear on vehicles marked as 2017.5 models.

Before the change, buyers would need to move from a base S to a SV before the latter two safety aids became standard kit. Finding a Rogue with AEB meant sourcing a high-end SL with Premium Package. Of course, the upgraded content comes at a price. For the upgraded models, a base S will add $620 to the after-delivery price, reaching $25,380. Other Rogues will see $400 tacked onto the MSRP.

That sets up an odd tug of war on the Nissan lot, as the 2017 model already carries $2,000 in incentives. Deals could be had if Nissan decides to further sweeten the pot to clear out older models.

Over at Toyota, RAV4 prices are dropping, not rising. The automaker has shaved $500 from the base LE, for an after-delivery price of $25,370 — ten bucks less than the base Rogue. However, larger savings are found as you move up the trim ladder.

The mid-year update sees the price of a XLE drop by $1,350, while the SE receives a $1,195 price cut. A Limited model will cost $925 less, but nothing changes at the Platinum level. While Nissan is raising prices and adding standard content, Toyota has taken the exact opposite approach, temping buyers with lower prices but jettisoning some content. Missing from mid-year LE and XLE models are roof rails, which now become optional.

The XLE also loses its upgraded stereo system and guide lines on its backup camera. Newly missing from the SE is a power liftgate, Smart Key and blind sport monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, while the Limited drops its front and rear sonar.

To make up for the loss of standard features, Toyota plans to offer customers discounted “Extra Value Package” that bundle many of the goodies together for a lower price. If a reasonably loaded RAV4 is a buyer’s goal, it’s likely they can achieve it without moving up the trim ladder, saving money in the process.

[Image: © 2017 Chris Tonn; Toyota Motor Corporation]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • Redapple Redapple on May 11, 2017

    I like CUV s. I will not buy another car. EVER. Except V-8 Mustang GT dream car some day.

  • Mchan1 Mchan1 on May 11, 2017

    Prefer sedans than a CUV but not in the market for a newer vehicle now. Eventually, may upgrade due to age as it's beginning to get harder to get into/out of cars. IF I was, I'd consider: 1. Toyota Rav4 Hybrid only, though the cheapish interior and smaller room for a 6ft person with wide shoulders may not be a good match. 2. Honda CRV but would prefer a hybrid which may be released in the future. Turned off by Honda's policy of lousy equipment and have to pay up to get features. Any wonder my family/relatives left Honda years ago! 3. Nissan Rogue looks decent and is relatively roomy but ONLY in the current 2016-2017 models as the older ones did Not have much room for tall people with wide shoulders. Also, the performance and interior quality wasn't that great then but noticed that Nissan included more standard equipment and improved interior quality and room. - I'd go for the hybrid version. Next vehicle won't be for a couple of years but there should be more hybrid models in the future, esp. if its in AWD since I'm in the Northeast. Hopefully, their costs will come down eventually! EV vehicles... forget it unless it makes a range of 75-100 miles in 1 day and prices drop!!

  • CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
Next