Ace of Base: 2017 Mazda 6 Sport

by Matthew Guy

Published: April 13th, 2017

Before we start this Ace of Base, we need to get one thing clear: no one listens to automotive journalists. We can carp about bad cars and exhort the good ones, but at the end of the day, customers go out and buy whatever they want.I’m saying this with tongue firmly in cheek, of course, but there is a nugget of truth. The Mazda 6 is one of the best driving sedans in the mid-size segment, wrapped up in a good-looking body with plenty of interior space. Naturally, it sells at approximately the pace of glacier progression.The base Mazda 6, effectively labeled by marketing mavens as the Sport model, is awash with standard features like natty 17-inch aluminum alloys, air conditioning, all manner of power options, and connectivity. Most of that is available on the base models of its competitors. What’s not found on most of its opponents is a smidgen of driving dynamism mixed with a manual transmission.Mazda has a great history of foisting tongue-twisting and/or inscrutable acronyms on the automotive public. (SKYACTIV sends Microsoft Word’s spellcheck into a snit befitting a Hollywood diva.) Mazda’s most recent effort to grenade my typing program is G-Vectoring, which at least has a tangible benefit on driving pleasure.G-Vectoring is a gee-whiz movement control baked into most Mazdas that operates in the background during a spirited drive, allowing the car to attack corners with more vigor. By slightly adjusting and fine-tuning power delivery, it shifts around the car’s weight on initial turn-in. This improves steering response when hustling along a back road. Every Mazda 6, regardless of pedal or option choice, is powered by a 2.5-liter inline-four making 185 horsepower. Even on models absent of G-Vectoring, one can feel the sporting spirit of the team that made Zoom-Zoom its mantra.Keyless entry, push button start, and a backup camera are all aboard for the ride. In terms of colour, Mazda has an annoying habit of charging extra for Soul Red Metallic, but at least the sharp Blue Reflex Mica is a $0 option. Anything off the grayscale is good by me. Sporty handling, room for the family, snappy styling, and a stick shift for $21,945? Job done. And yes, I do think those front fenders are a good nod to the RX-8.While I currently deploy an aggro-Charger as our family daily, we had a 2006 Mazda 6 hatchback (manual shift, natch) for several years. The interior of that one was decidedly Playskool compared to the current model, but it sure beat the hell out of the other family sedan options at the time.Starting at $21,945 plus destination, the Mazda 6 Sport is a great sedan at a great price. At the current rate of sales, it’s also one of the industry’s great secrets.Not every base model has aced it. The ones that have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selections.The model above is shown with American options and is priced in Trump Bucks. As always, your dealer may sell for less.

#AceOfBase #Mazda #Mazda6 #Mazda6 #Mid-sizeSedans

Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 133 comments

05lgt on Apr 13, 2017

This is almost exactly the price I saw a 14 MKS w 30k for... The heck with base.

Like Reply
Funky on Apr 13, 2017

I figured I might as well jump in and mention again that I own a 2017 Mazda 6 Touring with a manual transmission. Mine is very quiet (sometimes I don't notice how fast I am driving). Having also owned a BMW 5 series (fifth generation with all wheel drive and six cylinder engine), I can say, based on real experience, I believe the current Mazda 6 offers a more pleasing drive (to my tastes, anyway). The Touring model interior is tasteful. The sound of the engine is nice. So far, in mixed driving (admittedly, maybe a little more highway than in-town), I am getting more than 30 MPG on average. My kids (both over 15 years of age) both commented they like the amount of room they have in the back seats and they like the comfort of the back seats. My experience with the car, so far, is fantastic and I have no complaints. From my point of view, it is a decent vehicle which is fun to drive which also has upscale features including an attention to detail in manufacturing and design.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

28-Cars-Later I thought today's young people weren't even getting licenses to drive, so which is it?
28-Cars-Later Either last year or the year before I was discussing how The Dytopia™'s BEV schemes do not scale simply because the existing grid cannot generate enough power to replace ICE and the gigantic investment necessary in the grid was not forthcoming (Zelensky needed another house in Miami Beach after all you b!gots). So it struck me the only path to sort of do it is natural gas which became abundantly cheap 15 years ago because of fracking. Fast forward to more recently and surprise surprise we're attacking civilian use of natural gas out of nowhere for very little benefit. I couldn't find any good data to break down natural gas consumption between industrial use and civilian use, but spitballing I'd say the two largest chunks would be power generation and heating followed by small slices for other industrial use and home appliances- the latter probably being 5% or less (on my own gas bill its about 3-10% for the non furnace gas use depending on laundry loads). Some argued The Dystopia wanted to take away any energy freedom the proles have outside of electricity which they control on their whims, but I'm thinking that small number is optimal for them to take back because it doesn't force any additional infrastructure cost to gain (i.e. the low hanging fruit). As more power plants are spun up I expect a slow consolidation away from civilian nat gas because ManBearPig or whatever other fairy tale, but its really to power the gilded electronic cage they are constructing out of this once great nation. Seriously, break this down:Self lubricating Diesel engine with conventional OTS components, built for more than a ten year lifespan and 1m or more miles of use which can quickly be refueled at hundreds of locations (or fuel be brought to them). Pure BEV with some large amount of rare earths with a ten (?) year lifespan and perhaps 1m miles use but which has an avg daily downtime of 2 hours (?) to refuel and must be powered by a limited number of natural gas stations at static points (theoretically you could put a diesel fuel depot anywhere must faster and refill it with trucks). Other than ManBearPig fiction, your only savings in emissions is whatever the DEF isn't catching now (which is up to 90% in civilian diesel use per JLR) minus whatever emissions sins the nat gas burning creates. Think about how ridiculous all of this is to save 10-20% of emissions of only heavy trucks (BEV ships aren't ever going to be a thing) and you still have to frack like mad to have the natural gas to do it which would create the diesel in the first place. What is the nonsense?
Kwik_Shift_Pro4X The only vehicle from Chi-nah I'd be interested in would be a LR Defender or MB G-Wagon knock off with Chinese uniqueness.
FreedMike I'd be willing to look at a Chinese built car if Chinese companies were building them domestically.
SCE to AUX Hydrogen is the worst 'green' fuel there is - highly inefficient to produce, troublesome to distribute, and extremely expensive.