2017 NYIAS: Genesis GV80 Hydrogen Fuel Cell Concept

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Genesis Motors doesn’t exactly have the most diverse lineup in the industry. Hyundai may have only cut it loose as a standalone brand a couple of years ago, but its current showroom offerings amount to a full-sized luxury sedan and its little (midsized) brother. Genesis is working on fleshing itself out, though. The brand has plans to bring six new models to market before 2021 — including two all-important sport utility vehicles.

Providing us with a “subtle glimpses into the bold future,” Genesis has brought its GV80 Concept SUV to the New York International Auto Show. But if this is supposed to be a taste of what’s to come from Hyundai Motor Group’s premium luxury brand, there is reason to worry about its future. It isn’t because the concept is a plug-in hydrogen fuel cell electric — although a case could be made — but because the path its styling has taken is more than a little perplexing.

“There is a unique energy and diverse global culture to New York that is fitting for Genesis, and we are excited to unveil the GV80 Concept here,” said Genesis head Manfred Fitzgerald in an official statement. “This concept is an important milestone for the brand to share our vision of the future, introducing a further expansion of our product portfolio.”

Yesterday I saw a man wearing a rhinestone-encrusted Yankee’s cap going on a rant over the Vietnamese sandwich he had recently purchased, so I think know the specific type of New York energy and diverse global culture Fitzgerald is referencing.

“The GV80 Concept is a SUV that alludes to the confidence and evolution of the Genesis brand — its design is timeless, with an understated yet dynamic overall surface complexity,” said the brand’s head of design, Luc Donckerwolke. “These are all characteristics that embody Genesis products and delicately reflect distinctive elements, which you’ll continue to see in future models from our brand.”

I sincerely hope not, as the most distinctive elements are also the most offensive. If Genesis can point to elements of the GV80’s design and still sincerely consider them timeless, then there is something fundamentally wrong with its design team. Nothing about the bizarre criss-cross pillar graphics, 23-inch mesh alloy wheels, chain-link chrome grille, and twin-slit headlamps inspire a sense of perennial grace when combined on vehicle. If anything, the GV80 Concept’s styling looks like the end result of automotive Mad Libs than a singular vision.

It does, however, have a pleasant silhouette and Genesis claims the mesh wheels are a necessary measure to save unsprung weight — meaning they’ll never ever make it to a production model. It’s also hard to imagine those headlights passing regulations or the folded bodywork being cost effective.

The whole vehicle exists under a “Athletic Elegance” design thesis that attempts to merge on and off-road performance with high-end luxury, but the execution just feels so wrong — like an energy drink for old people when coffee should suffice. The GV80 is far too ‘xtreme to posit a sense of class and does not feel like a serious attempt to develop something that might make it into production. Even the official press materials provided were half-baked.

Mechanical details were nonexistent, the exterior rendering lacks any realism or polish, and the interior image shows the car parked facing the East River with the speedometer reading 103 miles per hour. That’s not a minor mistake. That’s either a complete lack of effort or a vindictive graphic designer who is trying to tell us something about the brand’s future.

[Images: Genesis Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Kyree Kyree on Apr 12, 2017

    Genesis really needs to do a good job of differentiating its cars from those of Hyundai. As it stands, I could easily see the production version of this looking like a slightly sleeker version of the Hyundai Tucson (currently Hyundai's smallest and cheapest crossover). That's not good.

  • Bd2 Bd2 on Apr 16, 2017

    Only good thing is the interior; the rest of the design is just "bleh."

  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
Next