Geneva 2017: Volvo's Next-generation XC60 is Dressed to Impress

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

When the Volvo XC60 first entered the premium compact CUV market, the world was still fully in the grip of a financial crisis, Twitter was relatively new, and America was transitioning from its 43rd to 44th president.

Despite enjoying remarkably stable sales from its solid entry in the wildly competitive segment, Volvo clearly felt it was time for a change. And what better strategy exists besides emulating the model’s critically acclaimed bigger brother, the XC90?

The answer: none. Fully made over, the second-generation 2018 Volvo XC60 revealed today at the Geneva Motor Show borrows some of the XC90’s best hardware and design cues, resulting in a strikingly handsome and grown-up crossover.

With utility vehicles sales on fire and the XC60 representing about 30 percent of Volvo’s worldwide volume, there’s no shortage of pressure to get this model right.

Gone is the sinking-by-the-bow, oversized-wagon appearance of its predecessor, replaced by a poised and upright structure that oozes reserved class. Thor’s Hammer headlights flank a corporate grille that eschews the XC90’s chrome-heavy look. Almost everything else, however, is ripped right out of the larger model’s playbook.

That’s not to say the XC60 doesn’t diverge in several ways. The hood features a more pronounced slope, and its upper flanks do not have the smooth, uninterrupted flow of the XC90. A pronounced crease over the rear fenders, coupled with a deep character line and a more steeply raked windshield, signals an athleticism that its stablemate prefers to keep hidden. Most importantly, the model isn’t likely be mistaken for anything other than a Volvo.

“We have a strong heritage in designing stylish and dynamic SUVs that offer the latest in technology. The new XC60 will be no exception,” said CEO Håkan Samuelsson in a statement. “It’s the perfect car for an active lifestyle, and it represents the next step in our transformation plan.”

Now underpinned by the company’s Scalable Product Architecture (SPA), the model adopts every tool in Volvo’s safety kit. Steer Assist is now on tap, which works with the vehicle’s Oncoming Lane Mitigation function to steer the XC60 out of the way of oncoming vehicles. The same feature also joins forces with Volvo’s blind spot monitors to keep a wide berth from careless lane changers.

Motivating the new XC60 are three powertrains, all mated to all-wheel drive and an eight-speed automatic. Volvo’s turbocharged T5 2.0-liter four-cylinder makes 254 horsepower, while the T6 — which keeps the displacement and adds a supercharger — is good for 320 hp and 295 lb-ft of torque. Topping the XC60 range is the automaker’s T8 plug-in hybrid powertrain, offering 407 combined horsepower and a 0-62 mile per hour sprint time of 5.3 seconds.

2018 Volvo XC60s should start rolling out of Sweden in mid-April.

[Images: Volvo Cars]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 44 comments
  • SuperCarEnthusiast SuperCarEnthusiast on Mar 08, 2017

    "2018 Volvo XC60s should start rolling out of Sweden in mid-April." Does anyone know when it will be in the showrooms? Some say Spring; other say Fall?

  • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Apr 19, 2017

    We'll just make umpteen models, no worries about overlap or mission. Everything is awesome!

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next