Dodge Resurrects the Demon Name, Promises a Wilder Hellcat in New York

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Here’s some sage advice: there’s no known way to use snippets of Metallica’s ‘Fuel’ in an automotive video without prompting audience eye-rolling. Scientists are working around the clock, but hopes remain dim.

The song appears towards the end of a teaser video produced by Fiat Chrysler’s Dodge division, featuring a snarling, caged beast that suddenly shape shifts into a fiery demon once released. There’s no new vehicle in sight — just a Ram Heavy Duty pulling the cage. More videos will follow, we’re told, but it’s the name that’s the focus here.

Demon.

Yes, Dodge has resurrected a nameplate last seen in 1972 and slapped it right after the words “Challenger SRT Hellcat” and “Charger SRT Hellcat.” While FCA hasn’t provided any specifications for these new beasts, we’re told to watch for clues about the vehicle’s true nature in the weeks leading up to the New York Auto Show in April.

Of course, the expectation for these mysterious and sinister models is obvious. That is: to outrun existing Hellcats and top the two models’ already stratospheric 707 horsepower. A handling-focused performance or appearance package simply won’t do.

While FCA throws out new appearance packages like Halloween candy, special edition models don’t normally warrant their own teaser website ( seen here), meaning there’s likely some steak to back up the name’s sizzle. If engineers managed to coax some extra horses from the supercharged 6.2-liter V8, it could help the automaker sustain interest in the aging LX-platform models. The current Challenger and Charger, after all, might stick around longer than anticipated.

FCA calls the Demon the “ultimate performance halo,” which lends credence to the theory that Dodge has conjured up more horsepower. But wait — here’s another clue.

“The Dodge Challenger SRT Demon is conceived, designed and engineered for a subculture of enthusiasts who know that a tenth is a car and a half second is your reputation,” said Tim Kuniskis, head of FCA’s passenger car brands, in a statement.

Track times, eh? Whatever this thing turns out to be, there’s no doubt that making it street legal would do more for PR than a track-only model.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 92 comments
  • Geo Geo on Jan 14, 2017

    Now PC groups, who are offended at names like "Cherokee" and "Redskins", are the new pearl-clutchers. Same mentality of scratching like hens looking for slights to make them feel righteous.

  • Johnster Johnster on Jan 14, 2017

    I think we probably need to start another Death Watch for Chrysler automobiles. It seems like all they are going to produce in the future are trucks, suvs, crossovers and minivans. Their last cars are going out with a bang, though.

  • ToolGuy My latest vehicle acquisition is slightly older than this one, same parent company, but has a full frame, rear-wheel drive and a longitudinally-mounted pushrod V8 gasoline engine. Almost like it was engineered and manufactured by a completely different group of people. Hmmm...
  • EBFlex Smart people
  • Wjtinfwb "Rovelo" tires? Good to see TTAC is not above the shameless commercial endorsement of unknown product like it's bigger print competitors.
  • Wjtinfwb Looks in decent nick for a Junkyard car. Other than the interior being partially gutted for some trim pieces, you could probably drive it out of the junkyard. Maybe a transmission issue and the cars value precluded a $2k or more fix? J cars were pathetic when introduced in '82 and never really got any better. But GM did sort out most of the reliability issues and with a modicum of maintenance these would run a long time if you could stand the boredom. Guess this owner couldn't.
  • GS340Pete I see a lot of these on the road. I can't remember the last time I saw one on my local Chevy dealership's lot. They've never in my memory had a few lined up with balloons. Short sighted to kill it off? Perhaps. But I certainly think the rows of $65k and up trucks is short sighted. That's going to bite soon. Looks like they're piling up already.And what about the Trax? Malibu or Trax? Gotta be honest, I'd pick the Trax.Although it should have 50 more HP IMHO. And why are so many preaching doom about the 'wet belt' engine?RIP, Malibu. Ride the highway in the sky with the Impala (talk about short sighted.)
Next