2017 Honda Civic Hatchback: Pricing, Power Announced for Compact Cavern on Wheels

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Starting next Monday, North American shoppers will be able to stroll into Honda dealers across the nation and take delivery of a Civic Hatchback. Mercifully, it looks a lot better than the pug-nosed, bent-nail-shifter Si oddity of the early 2000s.

Joining the sedan and coupe models to round out Honda’s 10th-generation US Civic lineup, the 2017 Civic Hatch will be available in a myriad of trims, continuing Honda’s curious recent obsession of offering their products with more lines than the surface of a record producer’s mirror.

All models are equipped with a 1.5-liter DOHC direct-injected and turbocharged four-cylinder engine, but LX, EX, and EX-L Navi trims will see 174 stock horsepower while the Sport and high-zoot Sport Touring models are deemed worthy of an extra six horses. A six-speed manual transmission is standard on the LX and Sport models, while the other trims are serviced by Honda’s CVT. The CVT is an $800 option on the LX and Sport.

This means that Honda sees fit to offer the higher horsepower option with a manual, and for this we applaud them. The CVT limits torque to 162 lb-ft in all trims, while manual transmission equipped LX and Sport models are rated at 167 lb-ft and 177 lb-ft respectively. Reading the press release closely, Honda says the higher output models are “designed to benefit from premium unleaded fuel”, so be aware that the extra horses will probably only awaken when fed Sunoco’s finest.

‘Murican MSRP start three c-notes under $20,000 for a stick shift LX and nets buyers the standard fare of cruise control, power accessories, and a steering wheel that adjusts for reach and rake. The higher powered Sport trim is priced at $21,300, plus $800 if you want the CVT, which you don’t. The CVT-only EX will sticker at $22,800, bringing heated seats and a few more trinkets to the party. The Navi suffix and its attendant leather seats add $2,500.

Customers seeking heated rear seats and a 540-watt 12-speaker premium audio system will have to wait for the Sport Touring trim, available later this year. The sensing technologies found on other Civic bodystyles will appear towards the end of 2016 as well.

Interior measurements are interesting, as Honda claims a 97.2 cubic feet of interior volume. That’s more than the HR-V and only 4.3 cubes less than a CR-V. With the rear seats up, a claimed 25.7 cu. ft. is apparently on tap. Compare that to 37.2 cu. ft. in the CR-V and 23.2 in the HR-V. Honda says the Civic Hatch enjoys the largest available cargo carrying capacity in its competitive set. We’ll wait until we try one in person to see how much actual usable space exists. If you’re wondering, the Mazda 3 5-Door is rated by the EPA as having 20.2 cu. ft. of cargo space.

Honda anticipates the pedestrian CVT-equipped LX and EX models to receive the magical 40 mile per gallon rating for highway measures. Both manual transmission models will be close to that mark as well. Strangely, Honda says its slushbox Sport and Sport Touring models will achieve closer to mid-30s on the highway, presumably the result of drag from a MASSIVE WING not shown in the press photos. Maybe — this is a Civic hatch, after all. Some VTEC must kick in, yo.

The 2017 Civic Hatchback was developed jointly by Honda R&D teams in Europe and Japan and will be manufactured for the North American market at Honda’s plant in Swindon, UK.

[Images: Honda North America]


Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 78 comments
  • Dividebytube Dividebytube on Sep 26, 2016

    Not thrilled by the exterior - but a manual transmission, usable haul space, and a small, Honda reliable (?) turbocharged engine. It's like a Mini minus the premium pricing (and sometimes wonky engineering).

  • RedRocket RedRocket on Sep 28, 2016

    It is even more ugly than the conventional Son-of-Crosstour sedan and coupe, which is to say, plenty ugly, beyond even Mazda 3 hatch levels of mis-proportion thanks to the anime-themed front and rear ends. Somebody find an out-of-work GM or Ford stylist to let Honda hire, because the ones they have now are obviously staying out way too late at night in the party section of Tokyo.

  • CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
Next