Faster Four: GM Patents a Better Two-Stage Turbocharger

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

General Motors wants better performance from its boosted engines, so it headed to the patent office with a design for a new two-stage turbocharger — one that eliminates the drawbacks of the existing setup.

According to a document published by GM Inside News, the General filed the patent on May 19. The design (mated to a four-cylinder engine) isolates the low-pressure and high-pressure turbines, calling on one or the other (but not both) at different engine speeds and loads.

In a conventional two-stage setup, both turbines operate simultaneously at low to mid engine speeds, with only the low-pressure turbine working at high engine speeds. The two sides are never fully isolated, which compromises low-end performance.

Like a parent dealing with squabbling kids, GM decided to separate the two. In its design, the high-pressure turbo connects to the exhaust manifold via a high-pressure inlet duct, with the low-pressure unit connected to that channel via a low-pressure inlet duct. Depending on engine speed, an ECU-guided actuator located in the exhaust manifold opens opens the high-pressure inlet duct while closing off connecting channel, or vice versa.

The design aims to lower pumping losses while boosting the efficiency of both turbines. According to the patent, “maximum available enthalpy is given to the LP stage (low pressure turbine) in full power operation and to the HP stage (high pressure turbine) in maximum torque operation.”

Expect to see the turbo lag-reducing technology added to GM’s four-cylinder engines in the future, with the high-output 2.0-liter being a likely starting candidate.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
10 of 57 comments
  • Kvndoom Kvndoom on Jun 26, 2016

    I for one do NOT welcome our new four cylinder overlords. (at least not in "performance" vehicles)

    • See 7 previous
    • TMA1 TMA1 on Jun 27, 2016

      kvndoom, don't forget you had to sign a software license when you bought the car. The electronic governor and ECU don't belong to you. Modify it, and you can expect to hear from some OEM lawyers.

  • Thegamper Thegamper on Jun 27, 2016

    Seems like a similar setup to what Mazda is doing in the new CX-9 2.5T. Not being an engineer, not sure what the distinctions are.

  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
  • Rochester Always loved that wrap-around cockpit interior. The rest of this car, not so much. Between the two, it was always the mid-90's Cougar that caught my attention.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X [h2]1997 FORD THUNDERBIRD 2DR CPE LX for $7,900 with 127,000 kms at a local car lot. On steel rims. lol[/h2]
  • SCE to AUX "Very rare just need my money back out of it"Rare doesn't equal valuable, but luckily you might break even at the $1500 price.
Next