QOTD: Could Cadillac Make It on Its Own?

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

About three years ago, a friend of mine who lives in Dallas called me to ask my opinion on cars he should buy.

He was cross-shopping a C-Class and 3-Series before the inevitable question came up:

“What do you know about the Cadillac ATS?” he asked.

“I like them. It’s a good start for Cadillac,” I said.

“But isn’t it just a glorified Cavalier or something?” he replied.

Joe (that’s his real name, screw protecting the innocent) may not know as much about cars as the rest of you, but he’s indicative of a typical car buyer who may not be well versed in verticals, corporate structure or Johan de Nysschen. But he does know enough to know there’s a relationship between Cadillac, Chevrolet and GM

The Cadillac CEO yesterday said the luxury arm of General Motors would have more autonomy in the next few years, including sales reporting and presumably profits that it would like to keep behind the Cadillac family crest.

I didn’t bother going into where the ATS came from, or why it’s around, global sales goals and overall platform. Cadillac hasn’t outrun the Cimarron shadow, according to Joe.

In that respect, a further separation from GM would help the brand succeed in becoming a larger, global luxury carmaker.

But it’s undeniable that Cadillac wouldn’t be where it is today without the Escalade — firmly a GM product, first — and the profit it provides. Furthermore, Cadillac gains much from GM’s economy of scale and global reach. On its own, Cadillac wouldn’t have direct access to the same resources without GM — even if it were to contract build every single car from GM.

It’s clear that GM wouldn’t be as profitable without Cadillac, but is it possible that GM is what’s holding Cadillac back from sales success in Europe and beyond?

As de Nysschen pushes Cadillac further from the GM model, a split could come into view, but for Cadillac — a brand that was weaving on the ropes only a few years ago — would breaking away from the mothership be a good thing?

Would Joe, our new luxury car buyer, be tempted into buying a new Cadillac if he knew the flagship luxury brand for GM was a brand all by itself?


Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 65 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Aug 15, 2015

    I did not know that Chevy still makes Cavalier. Another proof that Merc/BMW owners are clueless about cars and buy car based on badge and gauges/interior with the only difference from Camry owners that Camry owners have less money to spend and do not care about gauges/interior either.

  • Frylock350 Frylock350 on Sep 30, 2015

    I will say this; the Camaro will go a long way in paying for the ATS's development.

  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
Next