<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wagoner to Obama: D2.8&#8217;s &#8220;relatively weak balance sheets&#8221; require federal assistance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:38:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cretinx</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-551461</link>
		<dc:creator>cretinx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-551461</guid>
		<description>In the words of Assy McGee

&quot;F**k that noise&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->In the words of Assy McGee</p>
<p>&#8220;F**k that noise&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pch101</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-549812</link>
		<dc:creator>Pch101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-549812</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The point of all of this? Proper preparation, ambition, and long term planning will enable anyone to be in a better position to not only survive, but thrive during an economic downturn.&lt;/em&gt;

Using this logic, everyone would be a software engineer (until those jobs are ultimately outsourced to developing countries at a fraction of the price), and we&#039;d all be walking barefoot because everyone would be smart enough to avoid working in an auto plant or a shoe factory.

It&#039;s to our benefit that some people are willing to do manual labor for large companies.  Without such people doing nasty, repetitive work, the rest of us would suffer for it.  You can&#039;t just download your food.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>The point of all of this? Proper preparation, ambition, and long term planning will enable anyone to be in a better position to not only survive, but thrive during an economic downturn.</em></p>
<p>Using this logic, everyone would be a software engineer (until those jobs are ultimately outsourced to developing countries at a fraction of the price), and we&#8217;d all be walking barefoot because everyone would be smart enough to avoid working in an auto plant or a shoe factory.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s to our benefit that some people are willing to do manual labor for large companies.  Without such people doing nasty, repetitive work, the rest of us would suffer for it.  You can&#8217;t just download your food.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morea</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-549242</link>
		<dc:creator>Morea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-549242</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s simple really: Michigan is a battle ground state in the fall election.  Need I say more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->It&#8217;s simple really: Michigan is a battle ground state in the fall election.  Need I say more?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vento97</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-549222</link>
		<dc:creator>vento97</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-549222</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;
Andy D:

Dear S I’m starting to think handouts are not so bad. People losing jobs may force them to work harder or not.

That is all well and good, until YOU lose your job.
&lt;/i&gt;


Coming from a blue-collar upbringing myself (many moons ago), my parents emphasized education, education and education.  So while the ambition of my peers only extended as far as getting that union job that will make them &quot;set for life&quot; (yeah, right), I had bigger goals in mind.  I didn&#039;t come from money, but I made it happen via the following route:

1) Air Force - took advantage of educational/technical training - which led to:
 
2) Undergrad degree in Computer Science.  Was hired by a good company upon graduation, then took advantage of the company&#039;s educational reimbursement program which led to:

3) Masters Degree in Software Engineering.

I now work for a small, agile, company, and get paid very well.   And I am currently taking advantage of their educational and training opportunities to keep my skills up-to-date.

The point of all of this?  Proper preparation, ambition, and long term planning will enable anyone to be in a better position to not only survive, but thrive during an economic downturn.

Handouts only serve to blunt ambition, and allow the Big 2.8 companies to maintain the status quo for a few more years.  These companies need to go bankrupt so they will finally be forced to change their current, inefficient ways and come out of this leaner, meaner, and stronger in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i><br />
Andy D:</p>
<p>Dear S I’m starting to think handouts are not so bad. People losing jobs may force them to work harder or not.</p>
<p>That is all well and good, until YOU lose your job.<br />
</i></p>
<p>Coming from a blue-collar upbringing myself (many moons ago), my parents emphasized education, education and education.  So while the ambition of my peers only extended as far as getting that union job that will make them &#8220;set for life&#8221; (yeah, right), I had bigger goals in mind.  I didn&#8217;t come from money, but I made it happen via the following route:</p>
<p>1) Air Force &#8211; took advantage of educational/technical training &#8211; which led to:</p>
<p>2) Undergrad degree in Computer Science.  Was hired by a good company upon graduation, then took advantage of the company&#8217;s educational reimbursement program which led to:</p>
<p>3) Masters Degree in Software Engineering.</p>
<p>I now work for a small, agile, company, and get paid very well.   And I am currently taking advantage of their educational and training opportunities to keep my skills up-to-date.</p>
<p>The point of all of this?  Proper preparation, ambition, and long term planning will enable anyone to be in a better position to not only survive, but thrive during an economic downturn.</p>
<p>Handouts only serve to blunt ambition, and allow the Big 2.8 companies to maintain the status quo for a few more years.  These companies need to go bankrupt so they will finally be forced to change their current, inefficient ways and come out of this leaner, meaner, and stronger in the long run.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy D</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-549151</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-549151</guid>
		<description>Dear S  I’m starting to think handouts are not so bad. People losing jobs may force them to work harder or not. I wanna improve my living conditions, have an easier life, live in a healthier economy and have fairer access to wealth. I think I need to know were money is going and why, if for no other reasons then to understand were the money is. I mean even if GM is giving $10b a year, its what they pay in taxes anyhow. How money affects my living opportunities is more important to me.

That  is  all  well and good, until  YOU  lose your job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Dear S  I’m starting to think handouts are not so bad. People losing jobs may force them to work harder or not. I wanna improve my living conditions, have an easier life, live in a healthier economy and have fairer access to wealth. I think I need to know were money is going and why, if for no other reasons then to understand were the money is. I mean even if GM is giving $10b a year, its what they pay in taxes anyhow. How money affects my living opportunities is more important to me.</p>
<p>That  is  all  well and good, until  YOU  lose your job.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DearS</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-549002</link>
		<dc:creator>DearS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 05:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-549002</guid>
		<description>Number one issue is job losses and impact on the economy from GM going down. I want to ask Obama if he has figured (hypothesized) that out. What are the consequences of the options being considered. Oh well, its not my responsibility, I&#039;m glad I got the clarity to see so many things for what they are, also I do feel frustrated and angry.


Imagine Toyota and Honda having a more challenging time because GM does not need to run a business as efficiently to compete. Not fair, Toyota and Honda can probably manage though.  

Now job losses, how bad is that? How bad is giving handouts? Is it better or worse than Job losses? Say GM does not get handouts, bunch of people lose their jobs. What happens to the economy in that situation? Will that negatively impact me? How much do handouts impact me? 

I&#039;m starting to think handouts are not so bad. People losing jobs may force them to work harder or not.  I wanna improve my living conditions, have an easier life, live in a healthier economy and have fairer access to wealth. I think I need to know were money is going and why, if for no other reasons then to understand were the money is. I mean even if GM is giving $10b a year, its what they pay in taxes anyhow. How money affects my living opportunities is more important to me. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Number one issue is job losses and impact on the economy from GM going down. I want to ask Obama if he has figured (hypothesized) that out. What are the consequences of the options being considered. Oh well, its not my responsibility, I&#8217;m glad I got the clarity to see so many things for what they are, also I do feel frustrated and angry.</p>
<p>Imagine Toyota and Honda having a more challenging time because GM does not need to run a business as efficiently to compete. Not fair, Toyota and Honda can probably manage though.  </p>
<p>Now job losses, how bad is that? How bad is giving handouts? Is it better or worse than Job losses? Say GM does not get handouts, bunch of people lose their jobs. What happens to the economy in that situation? Will that negatively impact me? How much do handouts impact me? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m starting to think handouts are not so bad. People losing jobs may force them to work harder or not.  I wanna improve my living conditions, have an easier life, live in a healthier economy and have fairer access to wealth. I think I need to know were money is going and why, if for no other reasons then to understand were the money is. I mean even if GM is giving $10b a year, its what they pay in taxes anyhow. How money affects my living opportunities is more important to me.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pch101</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-548571</link>
		<dc:creator>Pch101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-548571</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Let them die, they wont get one cent of my tax money if I have any say in it. &lt;/em&gt;

It&#039;s highly unlikely that a bailout would involve a direct transfer of taxpayer cash into GM&#039;s coffers.

The more likely outcome would be something similar to what was done with Chrysler -- federal loan guarantees.  

In this scenario, banks and investment banks would make the loans with their own money.  It might also include some investment from a private equity firm.  The federal government would guarantee the loans, in order to induce the banks to make the loans and to lower the interest rate.  

The taxpayer would be on the hook only if GM defaulted on the guaranteed loans.  If the lenders are smart, the money will come with strings attached.  I&#039;m guessing that they would take a piece of equity (stock) and get membership on the Board of Directors.

My prediction is that a bailout would be more for Wall Street&#039;s protection than for anyone else.  The federal government needs to prop up the banking system, and GM owes too much money to too many institutions to allow them to fail.  If we could bail out Bear Stearns, we will certainly give serious thought to bailing out GM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Let them die, they wont get one cent of my tax money if I have any say in it. </em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s highly unlikely that a bailout would involve a direct transfer of taxpayer cash into GM&#8217;s coffers.</p>
<p>The more likely outcome would be something similar to what was done with Chrysler &#8212; federal loan guarantees.  </p>
<p>In this scenario, banks and investment banks would make the loans with their own money.  It might also include some investment from a private equity firm.  The federal government would guarantee the loans, in order to induce the banks to make the loans and to lower the interest rate.  </p>
<p>The taxpayer would be on the hook only if GM defaulted on the guaranteed loans.  If the lenders are smart, the money will come with strings attached.  I&#8217;m guessing that they would take a piece of equity (stock) and get membership on the Board of Directors.</p>
<p>My prediction is that a bailout would be more for Wall Street&#8217;s protection than for anyone else.  The federal government needs to prop up the banking system, and GM owes too much money to too many institutions to allow them to fail.  If we could bail out Bear Stearns, we will certainly give serious thought to bailing out GM.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qwerty</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-548331</link>
		<dc:creator>Qwerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-548331</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;This fall, American voters have a tough choice to make.

Send your tax dollars to Iraq

or

Give it to GM.&lt;/em&gt;


I am betting on option C.  We&#039;ll stay in Iraq and bail out Detroit, banks, stupid &quot;home owners&quot; who bought more than they could afford, Wallstreet, farmers, and anyone else who has political pull and wants free money.  It won&#039;t matter who is president; the government is already bought and paid for by corporate interests.

The situation reminds me of the 70s movie Rollerball, where the country is run by corporations and the prols willingly accept it as long as they get their mindless entertainment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>This fall, American voters have a tough choice to make.</p>
<p>Send your tax dollars to Iraq</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>Give it to GM.</em></p>
<p>I am betting on option C.  We&#8217;ll stay in Iraq and bail out Detroit, banks, stupid &#8220;home owners&#8221; who bought more than they could afford, Wallstreet, farmers, and anyone else who has political pull and wants free money.  It won&#8217;t matter who is president; the government is already bought and paid for by corporate interests.</p>
<p>The situation reminds me of the 70s movie Rollerball, where the country is run by corporations and the prols willingly accept it as long as they get their mindless entertainment.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nemphre</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-548212</link>
		<dc:creator>Nemphre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-548212</guid>
		<description>How could you, as the CEO of a corporation, ask the government for a handout without dieing of embarrassment?  I can&#039;t stand these guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->How could you, as the CEO of a corporation, ask the government for a handout without dieing of embarrassment?  I can&#8217;t stand these guys.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy D</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-548181</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-548181</guid>
		<description>Re: Andy D The Fed essentially monetized $30 Billion (with a capital B)of bad mortgage securities that Bear Stearns had, and somehow the stockholders still received some money! Combined with the billions that agriculture receives, and, well, I am sure everyone on this site can come up with their own favorite forms of government largesse, coming up with a rational reason for NOT giving money to the 2.8 is fairly difficult. All Mullally and Wagoner really have to do is convince enough members of Congress (via the Archer Daniels Midlands’way) and they should get their money fairly soon.

  Does &quot;essentially monetized&quot; mean  &quot;gave&quot; in plain English? The  whole deal, any porkbarrel deal, is socialism for the rich. Such behavior shouldn&#039;t condoned. People should be held accountable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Re: Andy D The Fed essentially monetized $30 Billion (with a capital B)of bad mortgage securities that Bear Stearns had, and somehow the stockholders still received some money! Combined with the billions that agriculture receives, and, well, I am sure everyone on this site can come up with their own favorite forms of government largesse, coming up with a rational reason for NOT giving money to the 2.8 is fairly difficult. All Mullally and Wagoner really have to do is convince enough members of Congress (via the Archer Daniels Midlands’way) and they should get their money fairly soon.</p>
<p>  Does &#8220;essentially monetized&#8221; mean  &#8220;gave&#8221; in plain English? The  whole deal, any porkbarrel deal, is socialism for the rich. Such behavior shouldn&#8217;t condoned. People should be held accountable.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juniper</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547971</link>
		<dc:creator>Juniper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547971</guid>
		<description>Luther
Are you really calling a likely nominee for president of the United States a terrorist?
First they are only talking. Second they are doing it in public. I don&#039;t want GM or Ford getting any of my money either, but this is certainly refreshing considering the closed door energy policy meetings that occured about 7 yrs ago. Maybe $140 a bbl oil was the goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Luther<br />
Are you really calling a likely nominee for president of the United States a terrorist?<br />
First they are only talking. Second they are doing it in public. I don&#8217;t want GM or Ford getting any of my money either, but this is certainly refreshing considering the closed door energy policy meetings that occured about 7 yrs ago. Maybe $140 a bbl oil was the goal.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luther</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547831</link>
		<dc:creator>Luther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547831</guid>
		<description>GM won&#039;t build cars that people are willing to buy so GM goes and gets a political terrorist to steal our money from us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->GM won&#8217;t build cars that people are willing to buy so GM goes and gets a political terrorist to steal our money from us.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netrun</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547781</link>
		<dc:creator>netrun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547781</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt;

netrun: &quot;Where is my 80mpg car that GM promised me back in 1996!&quot;

geeber: &quot;Not to support a GM bailout, but, in all fairness, has ANY car company made those vehicles available for sale at reasonable prices yet?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I helped fund the 80mpg GM car back then through my tax dollars, so as a unintended shareholder in the enterprise I&#039;m looking for some return on my investment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
<blockquote cite="">
<p>netrun: &#8220;Where is my 80mpg car that GM promised me back in 1996!&#8221;</p>
<p>geeber: &#8220;Not to support a GM bailout, but, in all fairness, has ANY car company made those vehicles available for sale at reasonable prices yet?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I helped fund the 80mpg GM car back then through my tax dollars, so as a unintended shareholder in the enterprise I&#8217;m looking for some return on my investment!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CliffG</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547542</link>
		<dc:creator>CliffG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547542</guid>
		<description>Re: Andy D  The Fed essentially monetized $30 Billion (with a capital B)of bad mortgage securities that Bear Stearns had, and somehow the stockholders still received some money!  Combined with the billions that agriculture receives, and, well, I am sure everyone on this site can come up with their own favorite forms of government largesse, coming up with a rational reason for NOT giving money to the 2.8 is fairly difficult. All Mullally and Wagoner really have to do is convince enough members of Congress (via the Archer Daniels Midlands&#039;way) and they should get their money fairly soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Re: Andy D  The Fed essentially monetized $30 Billion (with a capital B)of bad mortgage securities that Bear Stearns had, and somehow the stockholders still received some money!  Combined with the billions that agriculture receives, and, well, I am sure everyone on this site can come up with their own favorite forms of government largesse, coming up with a rational reason for NOT giving money to the 2.8 is fairly difficult. All Mullally and Wagoner really have to do is convince enough members of Congress (via the Archer Daniels Midlands&#8217;way) and they should get their money fairly soon.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redbarchetta</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547522</link>
		<dc:creator>Redbarchetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547522</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Bloodnok&lt;/em&gt; my congressmen are pretty much owned by Toyota being a resident of the great state of Kentucky with its successful auto manufacturing businesses. They might have interest in helping Ford but probably not if they kill more jobs. I am more worried about the other wishy washy states. Of course these congression crooks tend to work on their own self interests when they get to DC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Bloodnok</em> my congressmen are pretty much owned by Toyota being a resident of the great state of Kentucky with its successful auto manufacturing businesses. They might have interest in helping Ford but probably not if they kill more jobs. I am more worried about the other wishy washy states. Of course these congression crooks tend to work on their own self interests when they get to DC.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkross22</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547492</link>
		<dc:creator>jkross22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547492</guid>
		<description>Marc,

As I recall, there already is a sticker on cars that notates this info.  It&#039;s called the window sticker.  The same information is also available at fueleconomy.gov.  

$800mm for this department??  And we&#039;re $17B in the red at the state level.  I think we&#039;ve found a place to start cutting that budget and get some teachers back to work.  After all, with our high school drop out rate in LA hovering around 50%, some new car buyers may not even be able to read that nice new label CARB wants to use.  

How &#039;bout this - we take CARB&#039;s budget and hire some cops, build a charter school or two or maybe even (gulp) pay down our debt.

What an idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Marc,</p>
<p>As I recall, there already is a sticker on cars that notates this info.  It&#8217;s called the window sticker.  The same information is also available at fueleconomy.gov.  </p>
<p>$800mm for this department??  And we&#8217;re $17B in the red at the state level.  I think we&#8217;ve found a place to start cutting that budget and get some teachers back to work.  After all, with our high school drop out rate in LA hovering around 50%, some new car buyers may not even be able to read that nice new label CARB wants to use.  </p>
<p>How &#8217;bout this &#8211; we take CARB&#8217;s budget and hire some cops, build a charter school or two or maybe even (gulp) pay down our debt.</p>
<p>What an idea.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ra_pro</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547481</link>
		<dc:creator>ra_pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547481</guid>
		<description>The situation of a CEO with the salary of 15.4 Mil  asking the government for help from the taxes it collects from people making as little as 10K(just a wild guess, couldn&#039;t find the minimum taxable income  on Google really fast). How on Earth is this overall situation economically viable? Or for how long?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The situation of a CEO with the salary of 15.4 Mil  asking the government for help from the taxes it collects from people making as little as 10K(just a wild guess, couldn&#8217;t find the minimum taxable income  on Google really fast). How on Earth is this overall situation economically viable? Or for how long?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy D</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547371</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547371</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not for a bail out, but my vote wont count. I&#039;m just  a taxpayer.  The old boy network is gonna intercede. Just like it did for Bear, Stearnes. Gotta love socialism for  the rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m not for a bail out, but my vote wont count. I&#8217;m just  a taxpayer.  The old boy network is gonna intercede. Just like it did for Bear, Stearnes. Gotta love socialism for  the rich.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toxicroach</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547302</link>
		<dc:creator>toxicroach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547302</guid>
		<description>Man I don&#039;t know if there will be a big political push for bailing them out this time.  All that market share loss is people voting with their wallets and this time around a majority has indicated that American car companies can suck a tailpipe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Man I don&#8217;t know if there will be a big political push for bailing them out this time.  All that market share loss is people voting with their wallets and this time around a majority has indicated that American car companies can suck a tailpipe.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 97escort</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547292</link>
		<dc:creator>97escort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547292</guid>
		<description>The stock market took GM out and shot it today.  Last I checked it was trading at a new low of just over $11 and change.

Bankruptcy over the weekend?  June sales report comes out in a few days.  Must be terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The stock market took GM out and shot it today.  Last I checked it was trading at a new low of just over $11 and change.</p>
<p>Bankruptcy over the weekend?  June sales report comes out in a few days.  Must be terrible.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547282</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547282</guid>
		<description>Seeing as though GM is a multinational, I wonder what the WTO has to say about the US government supporting the US car industry.

Not that I have the illusion they could really stop it before it&#039;s too late, but I&#039;m sure this goes against some of their regulations.

Maybe they&#039;ll defend themselves by saying the Big 2+? are part of the US cultural heritage (btw, apart from some noteable exceptions, some heritage that would be...)

Anyway, could another Airbus/Boing dispute be on its way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Seeing as though GM is a multinational, I wonder what the WTO has to say about the US government supporting the US car industry.</p>
<p>Not that I have the illusion they could really stop it before it&#8217;s too late, but I&#8217;m sure this goes against some of their regulations.</p>
<p>Maybe they&#8217;ll defend themselves by saying the Big 2+? are part of the US cultural heritage (btw, apart from some noteable exceptions, some heritage that would be&#8230;)</p>
<p>Anyway, could another Airbus/Boing dispute be on its way&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geeber</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547281</link>
		<dc:creator>geeber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547281</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;netrun: Where is my 80mpg car that GM promised me back in 1996!

Where is the hydrogen powered car that was supposed to be available .. five years ago!&lt;/i&gt;

Not to support a GM bailout, but, in all fairness, has ANY car company made those vehicles available for sale at reasonable prices yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>netrun: Where is my 80mpg car that GM promised me back in 1996!</p>
<p>Where is the hydrogen powered car that was supposed to be available .. five years ago!</i></p>
<p>Not to support a GM bailout, but, in all fairness, has ANY car company made those vehicles available for sale at reasonable prices yet?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nudave</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547261</link>
		<dc:creator>nudave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547261</guid>
		<description>...and I assume Rick and his colleagues will work for federal executive compensation - which would be a bit under 200K per annum, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8230;and I assume Rick and his colleagues will work for federal executive compensation &#8211; which would be a bit under 200K per annum, right?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaje</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547201</link>
		<dc:creator>jaje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547201</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;ll write a letter to my Senator asking him to not support a bailout of the D2.8.  They need bankruptcy to straighten years of corruption and bad business practices out - not money from the Gov&#039;t to maintain a unsustainable status quo that benefits a very select and wealthy few.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think I&#8217;ll write a letter to my Senator asking him to not support a bailout of the D2.8.  They need bankruptcy to straighten years of corruption and bad business practices out &#8211; not money from the Gov&#8217;t to maintain a unsustainable status quo that benefits a very select and wealthy few.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netrun</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-547191</link>
		<dc:creator>netrun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wagoner-to-obama-we-need-to-provide-some-support-to-make-sure-these-new-technologies-are-affordable-to-consumers/#comment-547191</guid>
		<description>Screw Red Ink Rick and the rest of the Bystanders.

Where is my 80mpg car that GM promised me back in 1996!

Where is the hydrogen powered car that was supposed to be available .. five years ago!

Let them eat cake, I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Screw Red Ink Rick and the rest of the Bystanders.</p>
<p>Where is my 80mpg car that GM promised me back in 1996!</p>
<p>Where is the hydrogen powered car that was supposed to be available .. five years ago!</p>
<p>Let them eat cake, I say.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 55/156 queries in 0.119 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 22:51:28 -->