By Matthew Neundorf
August 24, 2007 -
The last time a Volvo was sexy, so was (Sir) Roger Moore. Just as The Saint titillated the fairer sex, Simon Templar’s Volvo P1800 had heel-and-toe types salivating. Shortly thereafter Moore was persuaded to abandon his Swedish whip for an Aston. By the time the English actor got into Bond-age, Volvo had turned deeply dull. Sexy was scrapped, safety celebrated. Stylistically, Gothenburg’s designs adhered to a Ty Webbian template: “Be the box. Be the box.” While Volvos slowly evolved away from the rectangular gestalt, they never quite shucked middle-aged mindfulness. The new C30 aims to change all that.
Available in Canada since the second quarter, hitting U.S. soil in October, Volvo’s “hot hatch” (yes really) is looking to cash in on the aging, fast and slightly miffed yet financially comfortable ex-tuner crowd. Alternatively, the C30’s yet another starting point for badge snobs looking for that first rung on the European luxury ladder. To entice both groups, the Swedish sampling’s got style.
Faced head on, the short overhangs and snubbed prow could easily belong to any Volvo. Correct! From the grill to the windshield, the C30’s built on the same architecture as the S40 and V50. Follow the reverse-doorstop roofline to mid ships, and there’s funk in that trunk. The taillights hug the C’s C-pillars in all three dimensions, accenting the hatch’s rear haunches in the best-yet interpretation of the corporate countenance.
The C30’s “P” inspired trapezoidal hatch-glass is pistonhead catnip. Leave home without the optional cargo cover though, and Bloomies’ Big Brown Bag will have a similar effect on the smash-and-grab crowd.
Just don’t order a C30 in “passion red.” With fenders found wanting of paint, my base T5 tester was more “Swedish berry” than Halle Berry. Anyone who doesn’t spend the extra Krona and check the Metallic Paint box on the order sheet might as well get a bumper sticker saying “Cheap Djävel on Board.” While you’re at it, sign-up for the dual tone body kit and 17” Zaurak rims. When you see a C30 thus kitted in Titanium Grey metallic with Java metallic trim, it’s time to call a Vet; this puppy looks sick.
Inside, it seems the Swedish vegetarians have turned their gaze to the automobile industry. Not to worry; Volvo’s T-Tec seating surfaces is an ideal alternative, guaranteed to keep Norse grasslands groomed. The infamous waterfall dash is cheap chic personified, while the switchgear’s tactility will keep even non-OCD sufferers busy for hours. A handy 12-volt adapter decorates the centre-stack, but a lack of defined cup holders hinders Scandinavian satiation.
Volvo’s trick dangling DIN radio unit is wannabe Bang & Olufsen done right. The standard audio package’s sonic performance is adequate, but in a world of LCD I.C.E., the O.G. (original Gameboy) graphics are ghastly. Thankfully, the C30’s supportive seats and thick-rimmed helm restore a large measure of street cred.
The packaging is a bit compromised. Upright, the rear seats are spacious enough for two high-heeled Swedish bikini team members, but leave just enough luggage space for their official uniforms and a couple of thirsty towels. Fold the 55/45 rears and that “Ramvik” coffee table and “Roskilde” rug your living room has been lacking are yours for the taking.
Volvo’s force-fed five-banger is in da' house. A mini mill cranking-out 218hp may be nothing special in this category, but 236ft.-lbs. of torque from basement to penthouse is. Put the pedal to the metal (how Volvo is that?) and 20 continuously variable valves chatter away, flinging the C30 to sixty in less than seven seconds. In-gear satisfaction is only a foot flex away.
Unfortunately, the cog swapping part of the program lacks a suitable dénouement. In traffic, the C30’s clutch play is smooth and predictable. Light a fire under the hot hatch, give it the beans, and stick travel… stops… time. Even worse, ultimate engagement is decidedly spongy.
The suspension isn't. MacPhersons up front and a multilink in back keeps city schlepping as placid as Aquavit on ice, while anti-roll bars and rigid body construction ensure all that torque isn’t squandered. Hang on to the helm and anything over 7/10’s is as safe as houses. Corners are controlled and understeer doled out in sensible quantities. The Sport Package tightens things up considerably. But make no mistake: even in standard trim, the Euro Focus’ C1 platform is put to good use. The Stig may not be cocking a rear wheel through Gambon, but Volvo security hasn’t watered down the Ford family fun.
Volvo is hoping to flog 20k C30’s stateside, 65k globally. The Swedish two-door is pitted against BMW’s U.S.-bound 1-Series, Audi’s A3/S3, a new WRX, Vee Dub’s GTi and the benchmark MINI. That’s tough company; it would be a daunting prospect if the C30 didn’t look so damn cool. But it does. And it is. Mission accomplished.
4 / 5 Stars | Volvo C30 rating summary and performance review
Subscribe to Newsletter
Back to Top
End of Comments
More Reviews

BlinkList
Digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Furl
Google
Live
NewsVine
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
POWERED
August 24th, 2007 at 9:38 am
I remember seeing this at the auto show, only it was in that amazing blue color. The rear end looks even better in person and I’m glad to hear that it drives just as well as it looks. Pricing doesn’t look too bad either starting at $22k.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:40 am
Wow. Best Volvo in a long time. When I pay off my Fit in 5 years, I should be able to afford one of these. Hot hatch? Try hottest hatch. It may very well unseat the A3 I’ve been drooling for.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:48 am
Okay, fine, it’s a good car. But it has the stupidest commercials.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:55 am
Something to lust after, to be certain; I’m so glad that smaller premium vehicles are really starting to make inroads here in the states. God bless high gas prices. However, I am not in the category of persons who can spend $22,700 on a “base” model 2-door hatch - optioned out this thing hits $30,000 pretty quick. Speaking of which, having a gazillion available options is pretty cool, but kind of overwhelming if you go to the site.
Woe betide Subaru; this presents yet another reason why people might opt for something other than a WRX. This thing looks refined, sporty, and fun to drive for similar money. Viva Volvo! (I know I’m mixing countries but it sounds so right)
August 24th, 2007 at 10:03 am
I’ve always apprecated cars that have great real-world dynamics. I’m not that interested in taking my cars to the track.
The combination of VW/Audi’s 2.0T and DSG is a wonderful real-world performer in the GTI and A3. There are other cars in this class with better specs on paper, but they often fall short of the GTI/A3 feel.
On the other side of the spectrum, I put over 100,000 miles on a Mazda RX-7 Turbo, grinning like an idiot, but sometimes the miles were draining. During daily commutes, I really wished for a softer ride, autobox, etc.
It sounds like the C30 might be another great day-to-day driver. Good torque, fun but not harse suspension, good looks. Another worthy entry into an embarassingly rich category of cars that Matthew lists. And that sounds great to me.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:17 am
That thing is hot. I hope it sells well!
The 1st paragraph of this review rehashes the usual “Volvos have been boring forever” sentiment, but TTAC has already discussed several really stonkin’ Q-ship type Volvos with turbos & AWD….that nobody bought.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:19 am
Great write-up. I’m really looking forward to checking one of these out in person. It makes my Top 5 list for my next vehicle (2-3 yrs down the road).
Side note/useless trivia: When Roger Moore was James Bond, he never actually drove an Aston Martin. He traded his Volvo for a wide variety of vehicles in the 70s and 80s. The Lotus Esprit and AMC Hornet are probably the two best remembered.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:38 am
Sammy B
Side note/useless trivia: When Roger Moore was James Bond, he never actually drove an Aston Martin.
Ah, but you missed the hidden clue! "Persuaded."
As in the ITV show The Persuaders. In the series, Moore drove an Aston DBS, although it wore the wheels of the V8.
Oh, and Tony Curtis' Dino was way cooler– and entirely unreliable.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:40 am
I remembered as a kid when Volvos looked like they were designed by a 3rd grade student. the rear end looked like a box and the front end looked like a box. squares for short…
I bet you guys didn’t dare to buy the Volvo before because the way it was designed but the body didn’t really matter for the engineers of Volvo because they were more concern on building a reliable engine for their cars, trucks and heavy equipments.
The Name Volvo is not all about cars it is Durablitity to the extreme.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:51 am
To Robert Farago:
*smacks head*
You guys are a crafty bunch!
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Show All
You must be logged in to post a comment.