<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Volt Birth Watch 63: 360 Gas-Only Miles. Maybe.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:09:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KixStart</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-643501</link>
		<dc:creator>KixStart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-643501</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just back from a trip in our Rav4.  it got 29.5mpg, overall (with a few legs doing noticeably better).  Trip distance was just shy of 3600 miles and we refueled 14 times, including the final fillup at home today.

The nominal range of the vehicle (probably including what&#039;s in the neck) is about 450 miles.  On a number of occasions, when we stopped, fueling wasn&#039;t convenient or seemed expensive and got skipped.  5 of our fillups were at 340-plus miles.  All of those were slightly nerve-wracking.  One fillup went to 13.3 gallons.

One shorter-range fillup was driven by poor fuel economy related to weather .  We should have been able to get to our overnight but shoving aside all that rain killed our fuel economy.

It would probably help if our fuel gauge was more accurate.  It&#039;s too pessimistic.  When it dropped below E, we actually have almost 3 gallons left but lack the confidence to use it.

Of the fillups at 340+, we could, convniently, have gone longer, but fuel was the principal consideration in stopping.  A couple times we refueled when it wasn&#039;t really necessary so we could stretch the next leg of the trip, if we wanted. 

So, yeah, I consider sub-300 mile range to be too short.  This won&#039;t be huge but it will be a factor for people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m just back from a trip in our Rav4.  it got 29.5mpg, overall (with a few legs doing noticeably better).  Trip distance was just shy of 3600 miles and we refueled 14 times, including the final fillup at home today.</p>
<p>The nominal range of the vehicle (probably including what&#8217;s in the neck) is about 450 miles.  On a number of occasions, when we stopped, fueling wasn&#8217;t convenient or seemed expensive and got skipped.  5 of our fillups were at 340-plus miles.  All of those were slightly nerve-wracking.  One fillup went to 13.3 gallons.</p>
<p>One shorter-range fillup was driven by poor fuel economy related to weather .  We should have been able to get to our overnight but shoving aside all that rain killed our fuel economy.</p>
<p>It would probably help if our fuel gauge was more accurate.  It&#8217;s too pessimistic.  When it dropped below E, we actually have almost 3 gallons left but lack the confidence to use it.</p>
<p>Of the fillups at 340+, we could, convniently, have gone longer, but fuel was the principal consideration in stopping.  A couple times we refueled when it wasn&#8217;t really necessary so we could stretch the next leg of the trip, if we wanted. </p>
<p>So, yeah, I consider sub-300 mile range to be too short.  This won&#8217;t be huge but it will be a factor for people.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-586091</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-586091</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;brent&lt;/em&gt;, you still don&#039;t get it.

The Volt is not OUT, so we can&#039;t say ANYTHING about it, good or bad. The Volt is being criticized because GM acts *as if* the Volt is already in production, when it&#039;s far from it. The Volt is also criticized because Volt supporters act as if the vehicle is already in production, using and arguing with specific numbers that we don&#039;t know will stay the same with the production model. 

You can hype and talk positively about the Volt all you want, but it&#039;s NOT OUT YET. 

The Prius on the other hand is out. It&#039;s been on-sale for years now. With the Prius, we have cold, hard targets with which to measure the Volt against when it comes out.

The Volt won&#039;t be out until late 2010 at the earliest. The next-gen Prius is coming in 2009. Toyota has confirmed this 100%. We know this to be a fact. 

Also since we have cold hard numbers from the current Prius, using logic and common sense the next-gen Prius would improve on the current Prius in most metrics. 

So by the time the Volt comes out, it will NOT be compared to the current dated Prius, it will be compared to the next-gen Prius that will have already been out on the market for over a year by the time the Volt comes to market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>brent</em>, you still don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p>The Volt is not OUT, so we can&#8217;t say ANYTHING about it, good or bad. The Volt is being criticized because GM acts *as if* the Volt is already in production, when it&#8217;s far from it. The Volt is also criticized because Volt supporters act as if the vehicle is already in production, using and arguing with specific numbers that we don&#8217;t know will stay the same with the production model. </p>
<p>You can hype and talk positively about the Volt all you want, but it&#8217;s NOT OUT YET. </p>
<p>The Prius on the other hand is out. It&#8217;s been on-sale for years now. With the Prius, we have cold, hard targets with which to measure the Volt against when it comes out.</p>
<p>The Volt won&#8217;t be out until late 2010 at the earliest. The next-gen Prius is coming in 2009. Toyota has confirmed this 100%. We know this to be a fact. </p>
<p>Also since we have cold hard numbers from the current Prius, using logic and common sense the next-gen Prius would improve on the current Prius in most metrics. </p>
<p>So by the time the Volt comes out, it will NOT be compared to the current dated Prius, it will be compared to the next-gen Prius that will have already been out on the market for over a year by the time the Volt comes to market.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nonce</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-585741</link>
		<dc:creator>nonce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-585741</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;For at least 95% of us out here we need our car to be a REAL car capable of traveling long distance if needed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah!  A REAL car!  Like a truck!  Or an SUV! Raaaah! I have a small penis! I let TV dictate what kind of car I buy! Hurururh1!!11one

&lt;blockquote&gt;but the reality is the 95% of us do NOT wish to deal with the extra hassle of a plug-in Hybrid.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Why, did you take a poll?

Plug-in hybrids don&#039;t work for people who don&#039;t have access to a plug at night.  That will take out a good chunk of people, maybe 30% to 50% of Americans. That&#039;s fine.

&lt;blockquote&gt;but the reality is the 95% of us do NOT wish to deal with the extra hassle of a plug-in Hybrid.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Do you know what RAV4 EV&#039;s go for on eBay? This is a car that &lt;b&gt;can&#039;t&lt;/b&gt; take gasoline.

There are lots of cars being sold in the tens of thousands &lt;i&gt;right now&lt;/i&gt; that don&#039;t have a 400-mile range.  Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bankrate.com/bos/news/auto/car-guide-2007/20070801_tank_gas_calc_a10.asp?s=10&amp;caret=3b#calc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bankrate&lt;/a&gt;. 

GM will have no problem selling the first 10,000 at $40K or even $50K, if they can just ship a car that basically works and they aren&#039;t beaten to the punch.  I fully realize that those are both very big &quot;if&quot;s as long as we&#039;re talking about GM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
<blockquote>For at least 95% of us out here we need our car to be a REAL car capable of traveling long distance if needed.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah!  A REAL car!  Like a truck!  Or an SUV! Raaaah! I have a small penis! I let TV dictate what kind of car I buy! Hurururh1!!11one</p>
<blockquote><p>but the reality is the 95% of us do NOT wish to deal with the extra hassle of a plug-in Hybrid.</p></blockquote>
<p>Why, did you take a poll?</p>
<p>Plug-in hybrids don&#8217;t work for people who don&#8217;t have access to a plug at night.  That will take out a good chunk of people, maybe 30% to 50% of Americans. That&#8217;s fine.</p>
<blockquote><p>but the reality is the 95% of us do NOT wish to deal with the extra hassle of a plug-in Hybrid.</p></blockquote>
<p>Do you know what RAV4 EV&#8217;s go for on eBay? This is a car that <b>can&#8217;t</b> take gasoline.</p>
<p>There are lots of cars being sold in the tens of thousands <i>right now</i> that don&#8217;t have a 400-mile range.  Check out <a href="http://www.bankrate.com/bos/news/auto/car-guide-2007/20070801_tank_gas_calc_a10.asp?s=10&amp;caret=3b#calc" rel="nofollow">Bankrate</a>. </p>
<p>GM will have no problem selling the first 10,000 at $40K or even $50K, if they can just ship a car that basically works and they aren&#8217;t beaten to the punch.  I fully realize that those are both very big &#8220;if&#8221;s as long as we&#8217;re talking about GM.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stein X Leikanger</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-585672</link>
		<dc:creator>Stein X Leikanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-585672</guid>
		<description>@Busbodger

Let&#039;s hope the GM skunkworks keeps whittling away at the VOLT, until they have something that really optimizes weight/power/handling.

I would actually buy something that looked like the Saab 9x concept, and which ran on the VOLT principle. I&#039;d be elbowing my way to the front of the line.
But an oversized, too heavy, &quot;make it look like a regular car&quot; version is not for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@Busbodger</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope the GM skunkworks keeps whittling away at the VOLT, until they have something that really optimizes weight/power/handling.</p>
<p>I would actually buy something that looked like the Saab 9x concept, and which ran on the VOLT principle. I&#8217;d be elbowing my way to the front of the line.<br />
But an oversized, too heavy, &#8220;make it look like a regular car&#8221; version is not for me.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeaverage</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-585261</link>
		<dc:creator>joeaverage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-585261</guid>
		<description>WhatdoIknow: I&#039;ll be happy to plug in and save the time of pumping gasoline in all sorts of weather - cold, rain, snow, summer heat. I&#039;ll also be quite glad to save my purchases from Big Oil when we go see the grandmas in the next city over. 

I worried the Volt would be some sort of bloated oversized parody of a Prius when I first saw it. Hopefully the real car and the concept car are only vaguely related or at least hopefully the GM product doesn&#039;t sacrifice utility for the muscle car looks. That&#039;s GM typical though - build a CUV and it&#039;s huge and heavy. Build a &quot;small&quot; truck and it&#039;s bigger than everybody else&#039;s. Big tires, big wheels, etc. etc. 

Never mind...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->WhatdoIknow: I&#8217;ll be happy to plug in and save the time of pumping gasoline in all sorts of weather &#8211; cold, rain, snow, summer heat. I&#8217;ll also be quite glad to save my purchases from Big Oil when we go see the grandmas in the next city over. </p>
<p>I worried the Volt would be some sort of bloated oversized parody of a Prius when I first saw it. Hopefully the real car and the concept car are only vaguely related or at least hopefully the GM product doesn&#8217;t sacrifice utility for the muscle car looks. That&#8217;s GM typical though &#8211; build a CUV and it&#8217;s huge and heavy. Build a &#8220;small&#8221; truck and it&#8217;s bigger than everybody else&#8217;s. Big tires, big wheels, etc. etc. </p>
<p>Never mind&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve_S</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-584832</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-584832</guid>
		<description>What I&#039;m saying is 400 mile range is fine for your daily driver and you could drive cross country I just wouldn&#039;t reccommend it. Remember as long as you stop by a gas station before the tank is dry you should be fine yah know? Like I need to stop every 240 miles to fill mine up.

Its a non-issue, don&#039;t even know why it&#039;s being discussed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->What I&#8217;m saying is 400 mile range is fine for your daily driver and you could drive cross country I just wouldn&#8217;t reccommend it. Remember as long as you stop by a gas station before the tank is dry you should be fine yah know? Like I need to stop every 240 miles to fill mine up.</p>
<p>Its a non-issue, don&#8217;t even know why it&#8217;s being discussed.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t-truck</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-584671</link>
		<dc:creator>t-truck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-584671</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Stephan Wilkinson Says: 
July 8th, 2008 at 9:40 pm 
Good lord, we’re reduced to criticizing the Volt because it won’t be perfect for “Northern Plains,” “the Southwest” and I guess the road to Prudhoe Bay.&lt;/em&gt;

There are 240 miles between service stations between Coldfoot and Deadhorse on the way to Prudhoe Bay AK.  I have a hard time imagining there is a longer distance between gas stations anywhere in the US, so this is a non issue.   

Yes it might not be what GM promised, but if brings Santa Lutz closer to having an operational vehicle under the tree for us let is slide!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Stephan Wilkinson Says:<br />
July 8th, 2008 at 9:40 pm<br />
Good lord, we’re reduced to criticizing the Volt because it won’t be perfect for “Northern Plains,” “the Southwest” and I guess the road to Prudhoe Bay.</em></p>
<p>There are 240 miles between service stations between Coldfoot and Deadhorse on the way to Prudhoe Bay AK.  I have a hard time imagining there is a longer distance between gas stations anywhere in the US, so this is a non issue.   </p>
<p>Yes it might not be what GM promised, but if brings Santa Lutz closer to having an operational vehicle under the tree for us let is slide!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pch101</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-584171</link>
		<dc:creator>Pch101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-584171</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I get 240-250 to a tank. 400 total miles sounds just fine. &lt;/em&gt;

If the blog is guessing correctly and the tank is only about 7 gallons, then that means that the highway range will probably be 200-250 miles.

Since most people don&#039;t want to run on fumes, that means that drivers will be hunting for gas about every 150 miles or so.  That will annoy the hell out of a lot of people.

In order to make buyers happy, there needs to be a balance between urban use and highway use.   (Of course, this assumes that the car is ever launched as anything more than a low-production test, something that I seriously doubt.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>I get 240-250 to a tank. 400 total miles sounds just fine. </em></p>
<p>If the blog is guessing correctly and the tank is only about 7 gallons, then that means that the highway range will probably be 200-250 miles.</p>
<p>Since most people don&#8217;t want to run on fumes, that means that drivers will be hunting for gas about every 150 miles or so.  That will annoy the hell out of a lot of people.</p>
<p>In order to make buyers happy, there needs to be a balance between urban use and highway use.   (Of course, this assumes that the car is ever launched as anything more than a low-production test, something that I seriously doubt.)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatdoiknow1</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-584161</link>
		<dc:creator>whatdoiknow1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-584161</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Volt isn’t supposed to be the cross country family truckster. Its meant to be a daily driver so 30-60 miles for your average commuter.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

This kind of thinking is why GM is all but broke today! 

I will bet that maybe 3% of the potential market for the Volt will be willing to accept such a compromise with their &quot;car&quot;. For at least 95% of us out here we need our car to be a REAL car capable of traveling long distance if needed. A Honda Fit or Toyota Corolla will take you across the USA with no compromise, you fill it up and go and fill it up again getting the same mileage.

Hint: the Prius works in the same manner.

More to the point someone will need to make a very convincing arguement as to why a $40,000 Volt will be worth $15,000 more than even the current generation Prius?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em><strong>The Volt isn’t supposed to be the cross country family truckster. Its meant to be a daily driver so 30-60 miles for your average commuter.</strong></em></p>
<p>This kind of thinking is why GM is all but broke today! </p>
<p>I will bet that maybe 3% of the potential market for the Volt will be willing to accept such a compromise with their &#8220;car&#8221;. For at least 95% of us out here we need our car to be a REAL car capable of traveling long distance if needed. A Honda Fit or Toyota Corolla will take you across the USA with no compromise, you fill it up and go and fill it up again getting the same mileage.</p>
<p>Hint: the Prius works in the same manner.</p>
<p>More to the point someone will need to make a very convincing arguement as to why a $40,000 Volt will be worth $15,000 more than even the current generation Prius?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wulv</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-584152</link>
		<dc:creator>Wulv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-584152</guid>
		<description>Why is everyone running numbers for the CURRENT Prius vs the Volt? Will there not be another generation of Prius&#039; out there by the time the Volt comes to market? (if it ever does) If Toyota makes the Prius a Plug-In Hybrid, all of these comparison numbers are thrown out the window. Comparing a vehicle that is already what 3 years old?, to a car that is coming out in 2010 (yeah right) is ludicrous. There are already modifications you can do with current gen Prius to make it a plug-in, that still come out cheaper than the Volt, gets you over 30 miles on battery alone, and average of well over 100 mpg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Why is everyone running numbers for the CURRENT Prius vs the Volt? Will there not be another generation of Prius&#8217; out there by the time the Volt comes to market? (if it ever does) If Toyota makes the Prius a Plug-In Hybrid, all of these comparison numbers are thrown out the window. Comparing a vehicle that is already what 3 years old?, to a car that is coming out in 2010 (yeah right) is ludicrous. There are already modifications you can do with current gen Prius to make it a plug-in, that still come out cheaper than the Volt, gets you over 30 miles on battery alone, and average of well over 100 mpg.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatdoiknow1</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-584102</link>
		<dc:creator>whatdoiknow1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-584102</guid>
		<description>Also, the current styling of the Volt is rather silly looking and makes the current Prius look conservative in comparison. 

Why is GM trying to make it look like some kind of muscle car? It is an &quot;electric hybrid&quot; supposedly desgined to be extremely economical. Whats with the big wheels and other stuff that aint gonna make it into production anyway?
Why the long hood? The engine will not be mounted length wise.

A price of $40,000, are you kidding me!  This makes about zero sense! Folks that can afford a $40,000 car (were not even talking $30,000 but $40,000!)have many options available to them. 
For instance they could forgo a 335i and get a 328i and spend the difference on gas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Also, the current styling of the Volt is rather silly looking and makes the current Prius look conservative in comparison. </p>
<p>Why is GM trying to make it look like some kind of muscle car? It is an &#8220;electric hybrid&#8221; supposedly desgined to be extremely economical. Whats with the big wheels and other stuff that aint gonna make it into production anyway?<br />
Why the long hood? The engine will not be mounted length wise.</p>
<p>A price of $40,000, are you kidding me!  This makes about zero sense! Folks that can afford a $40,000 car (were not even talking $30,000 but $40,000!)have many options available to them.<br />
For instance they could forgo a 335i and get a 328i and spend the difference on gas!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve_S</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-584092</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-584092</guid>
		<description>I get 240-250 to a tank. 400 total miles sounds just fine. Actually reducing the size of the tank to save on weight is a good idea. The Volt isn&#039;t supposed to be the cross country family truckster. Its meant to be a daily driver so 30-60 miles for your average commuter.

Not seeing a conspiracy here just seeing good sense, lets not be so quick to beat GM with a stick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I get 240-250 to a tank. 400 total miles sounds just fine. Actually reducing the size of the tank to save on weight is a good idea. The Volt isn&#8217;t supposed to be the cross country family truckster. Its meant to be a daily driver so 30-60 miles for your average commuter.</p>
<p>Not seeing a conspiracy here just seeing good sense, lets not be so quick to beat GM with a stick.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatdoiknow1</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-583961</link>
		<dc:creator>whatdoiknow1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-583961</guid>
		<description>FOOD FOR THOUGHT:
The Prius is a success becuae it do NOT &quot;plug in&quot;.
The success of the Prius is that it operate just like any other car on the road. You get in and drive and fill it up at the local station. It can also drive across the 3000 miles of the USA without any support from the electrical grid. 

Think, SELF-CONTAINED!

Maybe there are a few of you enviornmental junkies that desire to plug in their car every night but the reality is the 95% of us do NOT wish to deal with the extra hassle of a plug-in Hybrid.

The biggest question is WHO is going to buy the Volt from GM in the first place? 

Not for nothing but GM does NOT have a reputation for doing &quot;high-tech&quot; very well. GM is that company that wants to sell you a BOF throw-back as though it is a modern passanger car today.

Considering that by the time GM does (IF) has the Volt ready for market there WILL be other alternative available. It doesn&#039;t even matter if the Volt is better, folks DO NOT trust GM today like they do HOnda or Toyota.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->FOOD FOR THOUGHT:<br />
The Prius is a success becuae it do NOT &#8220;plug in&#8221;.<br />
The success of the Prius is that it operate just like any other car on the road. You get in and drive and fill it up at the local station. It can also drive across the 3000 miles of the USA without any support from the electrical grid. </p>
<p>Think, SELF-CONTAINED!</p>
<p>Maybe there are a few of you enviornmental junkies that desire to plug in their car every night but the reality is the 95% of us do NOT wish to deal with the extra hassle of a plug-in Hybrid.</p>
<p>The biggest question is WHO is going to buy the Volt from GM in the first place? </p>
<p>Not for nothing but GM does NOT have a reputation for doing &#8220;high-tech&#8221; very well. GM is that company that wants to sell you a BOF throw-back as though it is a modern passanger car today.</p>
<p>Considering that by the time GM does (IF) has the Volt ready for market there WILL be other alternative available. It doesn&#8217;t even matter if the Volt is better, folks DO NOT trust GM today like they do HOnda or Toyota.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaker</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-583921</link>
		<dc:creator>shaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-583921</guid>
		<description>KixStart:
If they trade 30lbs of fuel and tank for 30lbs of batteries, it would help to meet their &quot;40 Mile City&quot; range; a moving target for GM right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->KixStart:<br />
If they trade 30lbs of fuel and tank for 30lbs of batteries, it would help to meet their &#8220;40 Mile City&#8221; range; a moving target for GM right now.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brent</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-583891</link>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-583891</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;@CarShark:

Sorry, Brent. The Volt is the very defintion of vaporware. It’s in commercials, they tout it at every auto show, but they keep pushing up the price and downplaying the battery range and charge times so much. Others here, including me, believe that GM will never make this because they’ll have either gone bankrupt or gas prices will go down and they’ll stop bothering.&lt;/em&gt;

Sorry, &lt;em&gt;CarShark&lt;/em&gt;, but your comment refutes only the aside in mine (and not its main point), so I&#039;m puzzled as to why you&#039;re &quot;sorry.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>@CarShark:</p>
<p>Sorry, Brent. The Volt is the very defintion of vaporware. It’s in commercials, they tout it at every auto show, but they keep pushing up the price and downplaying the battery range and charge times so much. Others here, including me, believe that GM will never make this because they’ll have either gone bankrupt or gas prices will go down and they’ll stop bothering.</em></p>
<p>Sorry, <em>CarShark</em>, but your comment refutes only the aside in mine (and not its main point), so I&#8217;m puzzled as to why you&#8217;re &#8220;sorry.&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarShark</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-583791</link>
		<dc:creator>CarShark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-583791</guid>
		<description>From merriam-webster.com

vaporware: a computer-related product that has been widely advertised but has not and may never become available

Sorry, Brent. The Volt is the very defintion of vaporware. It&#039;s in commercials, they tout it at every auto show, but they keep pushing up the price and downplaying the battery range and charge times so much. Others here, including me, believe that GM will never make this because they&#039;ll have either gone bankrupt or gas prices will go down and they&#039;ll stop bothering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->From merriam-webster.com</p>
<p>vaporware: a computer-related product that has been widely advertised but has not and may never become available</p>
<p>Sorry, Brent. The Volt is the very defintion of vaporware. It&#8217;s in commercials, they tout it at every auto show, but they keep pushing up the price and downplaying the battery range and charge times so much. Others here, including me, believe that GM will never make this because they&#8217;ll have either gone bankrupt or gas prices will go down and they&#8217;ll stop bothering.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stein X Leikanger</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-583702</link>
		<dc:creator>Stein X Leikanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-583702</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a fantastic car. Is it true that the original concept vehicle made for show had better CE-numbers going backwards? Revolutionary!

Tells you something, doesn&#039;t it?
I think we&#039;ll end up with a Volt that looks pretty much like this:

http://www.autounleashed.com/images/saab_9-x_concept_geneva.jpg

Which, a few years later, became this:

http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/car-photos/saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept-3.jpg

Note that the only difference is that it&#039;s now a Bio-Hybrid Concept. In other words, not just any regular car.

But with Saab waning as a brand, expect the Volt to be slimmed and trimmed, until it looks like this:

http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/car-photos/saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept-1.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->It&#8217;s a fantastic car. Is it true that the original concept vehicle made for show had better CE-numbers going backwards? Revolutionary!</p>
<p>Tells you something, doesn&#8217;t it?<br />
I think we&#8217;ll end up with a Volt that looks pretty much like this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.autounleashed.com/images/saab_9-x_concept_geneva.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.autounleashed.com/images/saab_9-x_concept_geneva.jpg</a></p>
<p>Which, a few years later, became this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/car-photos/saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept-3.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/car-photos/saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept-3.jpg</a></p>
<p>Note that the only difference is that it&#8217;s now a Bio-Hybrid Concept. In other words, not just any regular car.</p>
<p>But with Saab waning as a brand, expect the Volt to be slimmed and trimmed, until it looks like this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/car-photos/saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept-1.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/car-photos/saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept-1.jpg</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brent</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-583652</link>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-583652</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;KixStart&lt;/em&gt;, my comment was in response to Johnson&#039;s, and my point was that if anyone is going to call the Volt &quot;vaporware&quot; -- which is isn&#039;t, by the way -- then, &lt;strong&gt;within the context of Johnson&#039;s comment&lt;/strong&gt;, it doesn&#039;t make sense for anyone to put it down &lt;em&gt;or&lt;/em&gt; hype it up. So neither side has much of a leg to stand on.

Nevertheless, if people such as you insist on putting it down, then there&#039;s really no compelling argument coming from someone &lt;em&gt;such as you (or Johnson, or anyone else)&lt;/em&gt; that says someone like me can&#039;t take the other position; an objective voice, however -- of which there seem to be precious few here -- could make the compelling argument that &lt;strong&gt;we both&lt;/strong&gt; ought to pipe down.

I suppose someone will have some sort of sarcastic, pessimistic comeback to this that will make him/her feel good. I don&#039;t care. My point remains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>KixStart</em>, my comment was in response to Johnson&#8217;s, and my point was that if anyone is going to call the Volt &#8220;vaporware&#8221; &#8212; which is isn&#8217;t, by the way &#8212; then, <strong>within the context of Johnson&#8217;s comment</strong>, it doesn&#8217;t make sense for anyone to put it down <em>or</em> hype it up. So neither side has much of a leg to stand on.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, if people such as you insist on putting it down, then there&#8217;s really no compelling argument coming from someone <em>such as you (or Johnson, or anyone else)</em> that says someone like me can&#8217;t take the other position; an objective voice, however &#8212; of which there seem to be precious few here &#8212; could make the compelling argument that <strong>we both</strong> ought to pipe down.</p>
<p>I suppose someone will have some sort of sarcastic, pessimistic comeback to this that will make him/her feel good. I don&#8217;t care. My point remains.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pch101</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-583621</link>
		<dc:creator>Pch101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-583621</guid>
		<description>If the car does have a 7-8 gallon gas tank, this is going to piss off drivers the first time that they try to take this car out of town.  With extended highway driving, the car will be using its gas motor most of the time, and deplete a tank that small in nothing flat.

All this assumes that the car launches on time, of course.  If they are still sorting out stuff like this at the moment, I don&#039;t think that they&#039;ll be meeting their target release date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->If the car does have a 7-8 gallon gas tank, this is going to piss off drivers the first time that they try to take this car out of town.  With extended highway driving, the car will be using its gas motor most of the time, and deplete a tank that small in nothing flat.</p>
<p>All this assumes that the car launches on time, of course.  If they are still sorting out stuff like this at the moment, I don&#8217;t think that they&#8217;ll be meeting their target release date.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KixStart</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-583572</link>
		<dc:creator>KixStart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-583572</guid>
		<description>brent said, &quot;For all the grist that these announcements apparently generate for the sarcastic and pessimistic among us, by your own words we must not make presumptions about range, etc., until products are actually out on the market.&quot;

In other words, we dismiss the Volt as vaporware until such time as we can actually go to the Chevy dealer and buy one?  I&#039;ll do that if Bob Lutz does that.  Do we have a deal?

---

shaker said, &quot;With this move, GM shaved 35 pounds of weight (gas + tank materials and supports).  Engineers froth over that kind of thing.&quot;

Engineers froth over removing weight &lt;em&gt;so that they can add payload, increase performance, fuel economy or range.&lt;/em&gt;  In this case, they &lt;em&gt;reduced&lt;/em&gt; range in direct and dramatic proportion to the reduction and increased payload, performance or whatever by ngeligible amounts.

Why did GM do this?  Why is this small amount of weight and space important enough to let the Prius have at least 50% greater range to empty and almost double the real effective range?

Some floated the idea of &quot;Just $30 to fill the tank&quot; as bragging rights.  Anyone can see that making a tank smaller accomplishes that without doing anything useful.  I could have $30 max filups if I filled my tank with pebbles and just put fuel in the spaces between.

By the way, if the Gen 3 Prius hits 50mpg highway (fairly likely), it&#039;s 11.9 * 50 or as-near-as-dammit 600 miles.  If they boost tank size to 12 gallons, they&#039;re there.  If they can claim 51mpg, they&#039;re there with the tank they have.  It&#039;s probably a psychological milestone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->brent said, &#8220;For all the grist that these announcements apparently generate for the sarcastic and pessimistic among us, by your own words we must not make presumptions about range, etc., until products are actually out on the market.&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, we dismiss the Volt as vaporware until such time as we can actually go to the Chevy dealer and buy one?  I&#8217;ll do that if Bob Lutz does that.  Do we have a deal?</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>shaker said, &#8220;With this move, GM shaved 35 pounds of weight (gas + tank materials and supports).  Engineers froth over that kind of thing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Engineers froth over removing weight <em>so that they can add payload, increase performance, fuel economy or range.</em>  In this case, they <em>reduced</em> range in direct and dramatic proportion to the reduction and increased payload, performance or whatever by ngeligible amounts.</p>
<p>Why did GM do this?  Why is this small amount of weight and space important enough to let the Prius have at least 50% greater range to empty and almost double the real effective range?</p>
<p>Some floated the idea of &#8220;Just $30 to fill the tank&#8221; as bragging rights.  Anyone can see that making a tank smaller accomplishes that without doing anything useful.  I could have $30 max filups if I filled my tank with pebbles and just put fuel in the spaces between.</p>
<p>By the way, if the Gen 3 Prius hits 50mpg highway (fairly likely), it&#8217;s 11.9 * 50 or as-near-as-dammit 600 miles.  If they boost tank size to 12 gallons, they&#8217;re there.  If they can claim 51mpg, they&#8217;re there with the tank they have.  It&#8217;s probably a psychological milestone.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nudave</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-583542</link>
		<dc:creator>nudave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-583542</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m certain that when &quot;they&quot; get the kinks worked out and offer a hatch for a price within 10-20% of a new Yaris, &quot;they&quot; will be Toyota and the car will &lt;strong&gt;be&lt;/strong&gt; the Yaris - or something very much like it.

Those who are waiting for GM to perfect this new technology would be well advised to continue breathing (don&#039;t hold your breath).

Their past performance suggests anyone foolish enough to be a GM &quot;early adopter&quot; will likely be part of the test program for a very long time, and there will be tears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m certain that when &#8220;they&#8221; get the kinks worked out and offer a hatch for a price within 10-20% of a new Yaris, &#8220;they&#8221; will be Toyota and the car will <strong>be</strong> the Yaris &#8211; or something very much like it.</p>
<p>Those who are waiting for GM to perfect this new technology would be well advised to continue breathing (don&#8217;t hold your breath).</p>
<p>Their past performance suggests anyone foolish enough to be a GM &#8220;early adopter&#8221; will likely be part of the test program for a very long time, and there will be tears.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Areitu</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-2/#comment-583511</link>
		<dc:creator>Areitu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-583511</guid>
		<description>The average Joe Schmoe consumer, who knows the Volt exists, but not the details behind it, couldn&#039;t be incensed to follow spec changes like this. I wasn&#039;t even aware of the original spec for gas-only driving range.

Aside from GM&#039;s marketing department and engineers tripping over themselves, and fumbling over what the targets they intend to meet are, it&#039;ll be inevitable the Volt will be compared to the Prius, the 3rd generation Prius at that. 

What&#039;s the volt&#039;s projected driving range going to be for city, highway, and mixed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The average Joe Schmoe consumer, who knows the Volt exists, but not the details behind it, couldn&#8217;t be incensed to follow spec changes like this. I wasn&#8217;t even aware of the original spec for gas-only driving range.</p>
<p>Aside from GM&#8217;s marketing department and engineers tripping over themselves, and fumbling over what the targets they intend to meet are, it&#8217;ll be inevitable the Volt will be compared to the Prius, the 3rd generation Prius at that. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s the volt&#8217;s projected driving range going to be for city, highway, and mixed?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robstar</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-1/#comment-583411</link>
		<dc:creator>Robstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-583411</guid>
		<description>I can imagine range between fill ups mattering  if you drive a ton, but is it going to matter to people who buy this to use the 40 mile battery only range?

I think it is an interesting idea, although the price point is completely wrong.

1st generation (right?) mass produced plug in for $40k...how could that possibly go wrong?

I&#039;ll wait until they get the kinks worked out and offer a hatch for a price within 10-20% of a new yaris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I can imagine range between fill ups mattering  if you drive a ton, but is it going to matter to people who buy this to use the 40 mile battery only range?</p>
<p>I think it is an interesting idea, although the price point is completely wrong.</p>
<p>1st generation (right?) mass produced plug in for $40k&#8230;how could that possibly go wrong?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll wait until they get the kinks worked out and offer a hatch for a price within 10-20% of a new yaris.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brent</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-1/#comment-583351</link>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-583351</guid>
		<description>So, &lt;em&gt;Johnson&lt;/em&gt;...

I trust, then, that bloggers and those who comment on blogs will also stop putting down the numbers for products that haven&#039;t even been released yet. For all the grist that these announcements apparently generate for the sarcastic and pessimistic among us, by your own words we must not make presumptions about range, etc., until products are actually out on the market.

I know you were trying to shut me up with your words, but they kinda shut you up, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->So, <em>Johnson</em>&#8230;</p>
<p>I trust, then, that bloggers and those who comment on blogs will also stop putting down the numbers for products that haven&#8217;t even been released yet. For all the grist that these announcements apparently generate for the sarcastic and pessimistic among us, by your own words we must not make presumptions about range, etc., until products are actually out on the market.</p>
<p>I know you were trying to shut me up with your words, but they kinda shut you up, too.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwltch</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-63-360-gas-only-miles/comment-page-1/#comment-583332</link>
		<dc:creator>jwltch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54762#comment-583332</guid>
		<description>Regarding the Volt, where is info. regarding the conditions under which the 40 mile range is achieved?  If I drive hard and fast, will that cut it down?  Do conditions have to be ideal in order to achieve the 40 mile range in electric?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Regarding the Volt, where is info. regarding the conditions under which the 40 mile range is achieved?  If I drive hard and fast, will that cut it down?  Do conditions have to be ideal in order to achieve the 40 mile range in electric?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 58/144 queries in 0.122 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 14:42:55 -->