By Frank Williams on May 27, 2008

71301007.jpgThe Volt cheerleaders at GM-Volt.com have given The General a chance to explain away the controversy over CEO Rick Wagoner's $30k price pledge on their new plug-in gas electric hybrid Volt. And the spinmeisters have grabbed it with both hands. "I now have official confirmation [from] GM spokesperson David Darovitz that 'there was an unfortunate misunderstanding that resulted in inaccurate information published,'" Dr. Lyle Dennis faithfully reports. "He also went on to say 'we are not in the position to speculate on the retail pricing of the Chevrolet Volt.'" Not after that debacle, you're not. Anyway, Dr. D. provides a helpful update on GM's efforts to use your tax dollars to help the Volt compete with the Toyota Prius. "Last week a new bill called HR 6049 was passed again by the house, allowing $5000 in plug-in tax credits for a car like the Volt with a 16 kwh battery. It allows $3000 as a base plus $200 per kwh over 5 kwh up to a maximum of an additional $2000. It may soon go before the Senate." Although volt.com's blog post on this misunderstanding displays a roll call of Senators who championed/shot down the last attempt at same, so that Volt supporters may lobby on behalf of a Volt subsidy, members of TTAC's B&B who wish to email their senators to oppose this legislation might find the list equally helpful. That said, Dr. Dennis didn't link the list to the Senators' email. Oops! 

8 Comments on “Volt Birth Watch 52: Wagoner’s $30k Promise an “Unfortunate Misunderstanding”...”


  • Kix Start
    KixStart

    Does money paid to lobbyists count as R&D for the Volt?

  • Joel
    jaje

    I was wondering when GM would reneg on this claim. It’s not like the CEO of GM is accountable for his words or even his actions. So what kind of bonus do you think he deserves for such a “heck uv a job, there waggy”?

  • Michael Karesh

    Some sort of tax credit is appropriate, especially since regular hybrids got one. But $5,000 is probably too much, unless this car gets stellar fuel economy.

    How about the regular hybrid formula, plus a certain percentage based on the battery-only range?

  • Edward Stulginsky
    Ed S.

    So what would this House bill afford new Prius owners? Reading through the tech specs on Wikipedia I see the toal capacity of the 45kg battery pack is just 1.31kwh. [I was supprised to see this figure juxtaposed against the huge 16kwh this blur mentions.] So I say let GM lobby all they want for $3K rebates for the Prius…

  • Stein Leikanger
    Stein X Leikanger

    Well, that didn’t take long. It’s best to stand back when you’re catapulting propaganda, and to make sure the arm slings it far away, and not straight up into the air.
    How many of these “we stand splashed, face and all, in egg of our own making” can GM stand?

  • William Montgomery
    William C Montgomery

    Good heavens, Wagoner looks like a mortician in that photo! Come to think of it, he always looks like a master of the embalming arts. How appropriate.

  • Nicholas Weaver
    Nicholas Weaver

    Who wants to bet that if such a credit goes through, a Plug-in-Prius appears before the Volt does to claim the tax credits?

  • dave dimi
    golden2husky

    We shouldn’t complain about some type of subsidy for new technology like this. We have been subsidizing gas guzzlers for years by allowing 1 year depreciation for big trucks. So, a 2 or 3K tax write off for the Volt (if it ever sees the light of day)seems fair in my opinion.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can also login using Facebook Connect. Connect with Facebook

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Tata Defends JLR Acquisition

    Ion - I wonder if SAIC is still intrested in the Rover moniker, Tata may be able to sell that. They probably could sell Land Rover and Jaguar to GM, once GM drops the...
  • Re: EPA: New Car Fuel Economy Continues to Improve; Back to Early 1980’s Level

    Nutsaboutcars - There was nothing speculative in what I said. It was based on tons of past data that prove my point,...
  • Re: Tata Defends JLR Acquisition

    Nutsaboutcars - I have a ton of respect for Mr. Ratan Tata,  but his Jaguar remarks are wishful thinking and whistling in the dark. Jag and L-R could not make a dime well...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    Nutsaboutcars - After Driving the previous Prius for 3 days in the LAX area in April and June, my opinion of the car went up by a huge amount. Well behaved,...
  • Re: Take Two: 2009 Honda Accord LX Review

    bollocks - Sherman lin “I had a 91 EX with automatic and I miss it dearly. That car was head and shoulders above every other midsize offering then. I wish I had...
  • Re: Capsule Review: Mercedes Benz 190E 2.3-16

    Bulldog Drummond - Hi there, driving in the uk is hardly the same as hammering the back roads but interested to read your comments on the Merc steering....
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    oldowl - Was: mid-1980s Saab 99L (lime green) Am: 2010 Prius IV (winter gray)
  • Re: Review: Porsche GT3

    bollocks - I think some of you are being too hard on Sajeev.  Until a few years ago, I never understood why people went gaga over the 911.  It’s archaic.  It’s not...
  • Re: Karmann Lives, Kindof

    mpresley - That may be true, but no one could match the number of snaps (half of them not working) on the top of my old MG Midge.  Besides, what’s a little water between...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    ragtopman - I’m practical but want a little fun out of life. Getting there is sometimes more important than being there. Has to be a convertible. My wife found...

 


Auto Insurance GPS Navigation
Car Loans Auto Parts
Car Warranty Wheels
Automotive Tires Car Care