Comments on: TTAC Photochop: New Mazda Premacy Mk III

By: andpad

andpad — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:15:14 +0000

About design it’s a intersting view, but about technical characteristics…?

By: Orangutan

Orangutan — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:37:10 +0000

psarhjinian: Absolutely.

By: ctoan

ctoan — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:56:10 +0000

Minivans wouldn’t have those visibility problems with the A-pillar if they’d ditch the 1-box design. It’s not like that extra interior room is actually useful. I suppose it improves aerodynamics, though.

By: Charles T

Charles T — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:48:40 +0000

So many cars are ruined for me because I’ve read my biology textbook once too often; the C6 Vette, IMO, looks like a praying mantis head. This one has a whiff of parrotfish about the front, and the somewhat dumpy area ahead of the windshield clashes a bit with the sportier area behind it. Still, I look forward to the real thing.

By: kansei

kansei — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:54:37 +0000

The body fits well with Mazda’s “flow” themed concepts but that front end looks way too Honda to me (ignoring the 5-point grille). The fenders, front and rear, also don’t seem very Mazda. It’s a nice car, as a Toyota or Honda.

It looks took fat/bloated to be the nice small agile Mazda5/Premacy

By: MarkAtkinson

MarkAtkinson — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:50:25 +0000

That has more than a little Audi A2 and TT about it…

Very nice, though.

By: psarhjinian

psarhjinian — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:50:19 +0000

Three more inches of front seat-track travel and optional stability control. That’s all I ask.